William Wimsatt, Donald Campbell, and the Idea of Robustness

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Morgan Thompson
{"title":"William Wimsatt, Donald Campbell, and the Idea of Robustness","authors":"Morgan Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s10441-026-09543-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, I chart the influence of social scientist Donald Campbell’s work on William Wimsatt’s ideas of robustness reasoning. One reason is that Campbell’s work is less familiar in the broader philosophy of science literature. Another is that Wimsatt’s famous 1981 paper on robustness was originally published in a Festschrift for Campbell and cited the three major works discussed here: on pattern-matching, on definitional operationism, and on the multitrait, multimethod matrix analysis of construct validity. I highlight some questions in contemporary debates in robustness reasoning: what is (are) the function(s) of robustness, the problem of discordant evidence, and the unification of robustness reasoning. I argue that some debates can be traced back to ideas present in both Campbell’s and Wimsatt’s work. Here I appeal to some unpublished notes and correspondence from Campbell as support and to coherence with Wimsatt’s larger philosophical framework. I propose that some resolution can be found there as well, through Wimsatt’s idea of robustness as a heuristic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7057,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biotheoretica","volume":"74 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biotheoretica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10441-026-09543-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I chart the influence of social scientist Donald Campbell’s work on William Wimsatt’s ideas of robustness reasoning. One reason is that Campbell’s work is less familiar in the broader philosophy of science literature. Another is that Wimsatt’s famous 1981 paper on robustness was originally published in a Festschrift for Campbell and cited the three major works discussed here: on pattern-matching, on definitional operationism, and on the multitrait, multimethod matrix analysis of construct validity. I highlight some questions in contemporary debates in robustness reasoning: what is (are) the function(s) of robustness, the problem of discordant evidence, and the unification of robustness reasoning. I argue that some debates can be traced back to ideas present in both Campbell’s and Wimsatt’s work. Here I appeal to some unpublished notes and correspondence from Campbell as support and to coherence with Wimsatt’s larger philosophical framework. I propose that some resolution can be found there as well, through Wimsatt’s idea of robustness as a heuristic.

威廉·温萨特,唐纳德·坎贝尔,以及稳健性的概念。
在本文中,我描绘了社会科学家Donald Campbell的工作对William Wimsatt的鲁棒性推理思想的影响。一个原因是坎贝尔的作品在更广泛的科学文学哲学中不太为人所知。另一个是,Wimsatt 1981年关于稳健性的著名论文最初发表在Campbell的一篇论文中,并引用了这里讨论的三个主要作品:关于模式匹配,关于定义操作主义,以及关于结构效度的多特征,多方法矩阵分析。我强调了鲁棒性推理在当代辩论中的一些问题:鲁棒性的功能是什么,证据不一致的问题,以及鲁棒性推理的统一。我认为,有些争论可以追溯到坎贝尔和文萨特作品中的观点。在这里,我引用了一些坎贝尔未发表的笔记和信件作为支持,并与文萨特更大的哲学框架保持一致。我认为,通过Wimsatt的鲁棒性启发思想,也可以找到一些解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Biotheoretica
Acta Biotheoretica 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
19
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Biotheoretica is devoted to the promotion of theoretical biology, encompassing mathematical biology and the philosophy of biology, paying special attention to the methodology of formation of biological theory. Papers on all kind of biological theories are welcome. Interesting subjects include philosophy of biology, biomathematics, computational biology, genetics, ecology and morphology. The process of theory formation can be presented in verbal or mathematical form. Moreover, purely methodological papers can be devoted to the historical origins of the philosophy underlying biological theories and concepts. Papers should contain clear statements of biological assumptions, and where applicable, a justification of their translation into mathematical form and a detailed discussion of the mathematical treatment. The connection to empirical data should be clarified. Acta Biotheoretica also welcomes critical book reviews, short comments on previous papers and short notes directing attention to interesting new theoretical ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书