Automated mRNA-Based Detection of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Tissue and Cytology Samples in Resource-Limited Settings.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1002/cam4.72359
Partha Basu, Anuradha Talukdar, Poulome Mukherjee, Richard Muwonge, Eric Lucas, Monoj Kumar Deka, Amanjit Bal, Upasana Gautam, Manish Rohilla, Baneet Bansal, Veenu Singla, Siddhant Khare, Andre Lopes Carvalho, Anita Gadgil, Ravi Kannan, Radhika Srinivasan
{"title":"Automated mRNA-Based Detection of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Tissue and Cytology Samples in Resource-Limited Settings.","authors":"Partha Basu, Anuradha Talukdar, Poulome Mukherjee, Richard Muwonge, Eric Lucas, Monoj Kumar Deka, Amanjit Bal, Upasana Gautam, Manish Rohilla, Baneet Bansal, Veenu Singla, Siddhant Khare, Andre Lopes Carvalho, Anita Gadgil, Ravi Kannan, Radhika Srinivasan","doi":"10.1002/cam4.72359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR), HER2, and Ki-67 is essential for molecular classification of breast cancer and in deciding upon tailored treatment. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) is limited. STRAT4, an automated RT-qPCR assay performed on the widely available GeneXpert platform, offers a potential alternative. We evaluated the performance of STRAT4 on core biopsy, unstained smear of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB-US), and cellblock samples compared with conventional IHC in 178 histopathology-confirmed breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Matched core biopsy, cellblock, and FNAB-US samples were analyzed using STRAT4. Concordance with IHC for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 was assessed using percentage agreement and kappa statistics. The effect of alternative dC<sub>t</sub> cut-offs used in an earlier study was also examined. Molecular subtype classification derived from STRAT4 was compared with IHC-based classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was high for ER across all sample types (κ: 0.78-0.86). PR detection showed substantial agreement for core biopsies (κ = 0.78) and cellblocks (κ = 0.63), but only fair for FNAB-US samples (κ = 0.53). HER2 detection showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.41-0.58), improving with modified cut-offs (κ = 0.57-0.66), especially for FNAB-US. Ki-67 concordance was low (agreement 58.9%-71.0%). Kappa values indicating agreement between molecular subtype classifications using STRAT4 on various samples and routine IHC were as follows: core biopsies = 0.60; cellblocks = 0.61; FNAB-US samples = 0.45.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Detection of ER from FNAB-US, cellblocks, and core biopsies using STRAT4 showed high concordance with IHC. However, the concordance was low to moderate for other markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"15 10","pages":"e72359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13639388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR), HER2, and Ki-67 is essential for molecular classification of breast cancer and in deciding upon tailored treatment. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) is limited. STRAT4, an automated RT-qPCR assay performed on the widely available GeneXpert platform, offers a potential alternative. We evaluated the performance of STRAT4 on core biopsy, unstained smear of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB-US), and cellblock samples compared with conventional IHC in 178 histopathology-confirmed breast cancer patients.

Methods: Matched core biopsy, cellblock, and FNAB-US samples were analyzed using STRAT4. Concordance with IHC for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 was assessed using percentage agreement and kappa statistics. The effect of alternative dCt cut-offs used in an earlier study was also examined. Molecular subtype classification derived from STRAT4 was compared with IHC-based classification.

Results: Concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was high for ER across all sample types (κ: 0.78-0.86). PR detection showed substantial agreement for core biopsies (κ = 0.78) and cellblocks (κ = 0.63), but only fair for FNAB-US samples (κ = 0.53). HER2 detection showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.41-0.58), improving with modified cut-offs (κ = 0.57-0.66), especially for FNAB-US. Ki-67 concordance was low (agreement 58.9%-71.0%). Kappa values indicating agreement between molecular subtype classifications using STRAT4 on various samples and routine IHC were as follows: core biopsies = 0.60; cellblocks = 0.61; FNAB-US samples = 0.45.

Conclusion: Detection of ER from FNAB-US, cellblocks, and core biopsies using STRAT4 showed high concordance with IHC. However, the concordance was low to moderate for other markers.

资源有限环境下乳腺癌组织和细胞学样本中ER, PR, HER2和Ki-67的自动mrna检测
背景:准确检测雌激素和孕激素受体(ER/PR)、HER2和Ki-67对于乳腺癌的分子分类和决定针对性治疗至关重要。在许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),获得组织病理学和免疫组织化学(IHC)的机会有限。STRAT4是一种在广泛使用的GeneXpert平台上进行的自动RT-qPCR检测,提供了一种潜在的替代方法。我们评估了STRAT4在178例组织病理学确诊的乳腺癌患者的核心活检、细针穿刺活检(FNAB-US)未染色涂片和细胞块样本中的表现,并与常规免疫组化(IHC)进行了比较。方法:使用STRAT4对匹配的核心活检、细胞块和FNAB-US样本进行分析。ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67与IHC的一致性采用百分比一致性和kappa统计进行评估。在早期研究中使用的替代dCt截止点的影响也进行了检查。将基于STRAT4的分子亚型分类与基于ihc的分类进行比较。结果:在所有样本类型中,ER的STRAT4与IHC之间的一致性都很高(κ: 0.78-0.86)。PR检测显示核心活检(κ = 0.78)和细胞块(κ = 0.63)的一致性,但仅适用于FNAB-US样本(κ = 0.53)。HER2检测结果的一致性中等(κ = 0.41-0.58),随着修饰的截止值(κ = 0.57-0.66)而改善,特别是对于FNAB-US。Ki-67一致性较低(58.9% ~ 71.0%)。Kappa值表明,在不同样本上使用STRAT4进行分子亚型分类与常规免疫组化之间的一致性如下:核心活检= 0.60;cellblocks = 0.61;FNAB-US样本= 0.45。结论:利用STRAT4检测FNAB-US、细胞块和核心活检的ER与IHC具有高度的一致性。然而,其他标记的一致性为低至中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书