Sharpening the cut: physical origins of rejection-curve broadening and routes to precision ultrafiltration.

IF 6.4 2区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Jamila G Eatman, Chaoqiuyu Wang, Paul F Nealey, Seth B Darling
{"title":"Sharpening the cut: physical origins of rejection-curve broadening and routes to precision ultrafiltration.","authors":"Jamila G Eatman, Chaoqiuyu Wang, Paul F Nealey, Seth B Darling","doi":"10.1039/d6nh00362a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sectors that require precise separation between solutes of comparable size often rely on ultrafiltration (UF) and loose nanofiltration (LNF) for a low-cost, scalable, selective separation. However, solute separations in this regime have stubbornly exhibited broad rejection curves where solutes with dimensions substantially smaller than the nominal pore size are rejected. The widened profile of these curves results from three distinct mechanisms. Pore-size heterogeneity convolves the single-pore response with a broad size distribution, and because Hagen-Poiseuille flow scales as the fourth power of radius, the largest pores dominate the permeate and disproportionately leak oversized solutes. Confined (hindered) transport leads to intrapore hydrodynamics, slowing a solute relative to the background solvent velocity and effectively rejecting solutes that would intuitively pass through based on size exclusion alone. Finally, the pore array presents only a limited open area to an approaching solute; under single-pass operation, a solute that does not encounter a pore mouth is recorded as rejected regardless of its size. Despite these challenges in achieving sharp separations, no fundamental phenomena preclude much narrower rejection curves in principle. Advancing toward an ideal \"step function\" rejection profile requires a systematic dissection of each broadening mechanism and a scaffolded approach where geometric, intrapore, and process architecture might collectively enable unprecedented precision in practical size-selective separations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93,"journal":{"name":"Nanoscale Horizons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoscale Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6nh00362a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sectors that require precise separation between solutes of comparable size often rely on ultrafiltration (UF) and loose nanofiltration (LNF) for a low-cost, scalable, selective separation. However, solute separations in this regime have stubbornly exhibited broad rejection curves where solutes with dimensions substantially smaller than the nominal pore size are rejected. The widened profile of these curves results from three distinct mechanisms. Pore-size heterogeneity convolves the single-pore response with a broad size distribution, and because Hagen-Poiseuille flow scales as the fourth power of radius, the largest pores dominate the permeate and disproportionately leak oversized solutes. Confined (hindered) transport leads to intrapore hydrodynamics, slowing a solute relative to the background solvent velocity and effectively rejecting solutes that would intuitively pass through based on size exclusion alone. Finally, the pore array presents only a limited open area to an approaching solute; under single-pass operation, a solute that does not encounter a pore mouth is recorded as rejected regardless of its size. Despite these challenges in achieving sharp separations, no fundamental phenomena preclude much narrower rejection curves in principle. Advancing toward an ideal "step function" rejection profile requires a systematic dissection of each broadening mechanism and a scaffolded approach where geometric, intrapore, and process architecture might collectively enable unprecedented precision in practical size-selective separations.

锐化切割:拒绝曲线展宽的物理起源和精密超滤的途径。
需要在同等尺寸的溶质之间精确分离的部门通常依靠超滤(UF)和松散纳滤(LNF)来实现低成本,可扩展的选择性分离。然而,在这种情况下,溶质分离顽固地表现出广泛的拒绝曲线,其中尺寸大大小于标称孔径的溶质被拒绝。这些曲线轮廓的扩大是由三种不同的机制造成的。孔隙尺寸的非均质性使单孔响应具有广泛的尺寸分布,并且由于hagens - poiseuille流动的尺度是半径的四次方,因此最大的孔隙主导渗透并不成比例地泄漏超大溶质。受限的(阻碍的)输送导致了孔内流体动力学,减慢了溶质相对于背景溶剂速度的速度,并有效地拒绝了仅根据粒径不相容就能直观通过的溶质。最后,孔隙阵列仅对接近的溶质呈现有限的开放区域;在单道操作下,没有遇到孔口的溶质无论大小都被记录为拒绝。尽管在实现尖锐分离方面存在这些挑战,原则上没有任何基本现象排除更窄的拒绝曲线。向理想的“阶跃函数”拒绝剖面推进,需要系统地解剖每个扩展机制和支架方法,其中几何,孔内和过程架构可能共同实现实际尺寸选择分离的前所未有的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nanoscale Horizons
Nanoscale Horizons Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: Nanoscale Horizons stands out as a premier journal for publishing exceptionally high-quality and innovative nanoscience and nanotechnology. The emphasis lies on original research that introduces a new concept or a novel perspective (a conceptual advance), prioritizing this over reporting technological improvements. Nevertheless, outstanding articles showcasing truly groundbreaking developments, including record-breaking performance, may also find a place in the journal. Published work must be of substantial general interest to our broad and diverse readership across the nanoscience and nanotechnology community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书