Increase in plant productivity in the tundra in Sweden is not related to increasing presence of warm-adapted vascular plant species

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2026-10-06 Epub Date: 2026-07-26 DOI:10.1002/ecog.08201
Tim Horstkotte, Jakob Assmann, Henrik Hedenås, Signe Normand, Johan Olofsson
{"title":"Increase in plant productivity in the tundra in Sweden is not related to increasing presence of warm-adapted vascular plant species","authors":"Tim Horstkotte,&nbsp;Jakob Assmann,&nbsp;Henrik Hedenås,&nbsp;Signe Normand,&nbsp;Johan Olofsson","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decades, Arctic and alpine biomes have warmed faster than the global average. Substantial vegetation changes have been reported as a response to this warming, including increased productivity and the spread of warm-adapted (thermophilic) species that are less resistant to grazing pressure into higher latitudes and altitudes. At a local and regional level, however, reported vegetation changes are much more variable. Here, we investigate community changes of vascular plant species in the mountain tundra in Sweden during the period 2003 to 2020 by combining remote sensing and vegetation monitoring at 419 permanent plots. We first investigated changes in vegetation productivity by analysing the trend in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). We then used plot averages of species-specific environmental indicators weighted by species occurrences to test whether the vegetation changed towards a more thermophilic state with a decreased resistance to grazing by mammalian herbivores during that time. We found an increase in vegetation productivity in ca 23% of the sites, and no trend in ca 55% of the sites. There was no general trend towards an increased thermophilization of vascular plant communities. Furthermore, at the plot scale, the change in NDVI during the study period was not explained by thermophilization of the plant community. However, warm-adapted forbs increased more than cold-adapted species. We conclude that, although part of the vascular vegetation is getting more thermophilic, the observed increase in vegetation productivity during the last two decades is not driven by an increase in warm-adapted species. We also suggest that reindeer grazing, which occurs in almost the entire study region, contributes to the preservation of cold-adapted Arctic–alpine biodiversity by selectively feeding on warm-adapted vascular species.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2026 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecog.08201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecog.08201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decades, Arctic and alpine biomes have warmed faster than the global average. Substantial vegetation changes have been reported as a response to this warming, including increased productivity and the spread of warm-adapted (thermophilic) species that are less resistant to grazing pressure into higher latitudes and altitudes. At a local and regional level, however, reported vegetation changes are much more variable. Here, we investigate community changes of vascular plant species in the mountain tundra in Sweden during the period 2003 to 2020 by combining remote sensing and vegetation monitoring at 419 permanent plots. We first investigated changes in vegetation productivity by analysing the trend in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). We then used plot averages of species-specific environmental indicators weighted by species occurrences to test whether the vegetation changed towards a more thermophilic state with a decreased resistance to grazing by mammalian herbivores during that time. We found an increase in vegetation productivity in ca 23% of the sites, and no trend in ca 55% of the sites. There was no general trend towards an increased thermophilization of vascular plant communities. Furthermore, at the plot scale, the change in NDVI during the study period was not explained by thermophilization of the plant community. However, warm-adapted forbs increased more than cold-adapted species. We conclude that, although part of the vascular vegetation is getting more thermophilic, the observed increase in vegetation productivity during the last two decades is not driven by an increase in warm-adapted species. We also suggest that reindeer grazing, which occurs in almost the entire study region, contributes to the preservation of cold-adapted Arctic–alpine biodiversity by selectively feeding on warm-adapted vascular species.

瑞典冻土带植物生产力的增加与暖适应维管植物种类的增加无关
在过去的几十年里,北极和高山生物群落的变暖速度超过了全球平均水平。据报道,作为对这种变暖的响应,大量植被发生了变化,包括生产力的提高和对放牧压力抵抗力较弱的适应温暖(嗜热)物种向高纬度和高海拔地区的传播。然而,在地方和区域一级,报告的植被变化要大得多。通过遥感与植被监测相结合的方法,研究了2003 ~ 2020年瑞典山地冻土带419个固定样地维管植物群落的变化。我们首先通过分析归一化植被指数(NDVI)的变化趋势来研究植被生产力的变化。然后,我们使用物种特定环境指标加权的样图平均值来测试在此期间,植被是否向更嗜热的状态转变,对哺乳动物食草动物的抗性是否降低。研究发现,约23%的样地植被生产力有所增加,约55%的样地没有增加趋势。维管植物群落的热干性没有增加的总体趋势。此外,在样地尺度上,研究期间NDVI的变化不能用植物群落的热干化来解释。然而,温暖适应的植物比寒冷适应的物种增加更多。我们的结论是,尽管部分维管植被变得更加嗜热,但在过去20年中观测到的植被生产力的增加并不是由暖适应物种的增加所驱动的。我们还认为,驯鹿放牧几乎发生在整个研究区域,通过选择性地以适应温暖的维管物种为食,有助于保护适应寒冷的北极-高山生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书