Empowering practitioners working at the agriculture–conservation interface

IF 2.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Science and Practice Pub Date : 2026-10-05 Epub Date: 2026-08-30 DOI:10.1111/csp2.70391
Adam K. Janke, Julia A. Baker, Catherine DeLong, Dara M. Wald, Nancy Grudens-Schuck, J. Gordon Arbuckle
{"title":"Empowering practitioners working at the agriculture–conservation interface","authors":"Adam K. Janke,&nbsp;Julia A. Baker,&nbsp;Catherine DeLong,&nbsp;Dara M. Wald,&nbsp;Nancy Grudens-Schuck,&nbsp;J. Gordon Arbuckle","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing global demand for food, fuel, and fiber has proliferated a suite of negative environmental externalities in some agricultural landscapes that conservation practices seek to resolve. But conservation adoption by private actors is often insufficient. Conservation practitioners facilitate adoption, but they often lack understanding of the agricultural production systems in which they work. We developed a professional development program to help conservation practitioners better understand farming and farmers to empower them to increase conservation adoption in one U.S. state with entrenched environmental challenges arising from agriculture. The curriculum combined instructional techniques, disciplinary experts, and farmers to explore the complexities of the agricultural system in which participants worked. Two cohorts of conservation practitioners (<i>n</i> = 20 and 23) working for 17 organizations participated in 20–21 sessions. Ninety-eight percent of participants agreed participation made them better conservation practitioners. Significant majorities reported increased knowledge about agriculture (100%), conservation (85%), private land decision making (90%), and behavior change (95%). Participants increased empathy toward farmers (+24.9%), increased communication self-efficacy (+15.3%), and improved intention to apply behavior change principles (+49.4%). Comparable professional development interventions may be implemented in similar contexts to foster greater conservation adoption and ultimately reduce entrenched negative environmental externalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing global demand for food, fuel, and fiber has proliferated a suite of negative environmental externalities in some agricultural landscapes that conservation practices seek to resolve. But conservation adoption by private actors is often insufficient. Conservation practitioners facilitate adoption, but they often lack understanding of the agricultural production systems in which they work. We developed a professional development program to help conservation practitioners better understand farming and farmers to empower them to increase conservation adoption in one U.S. state with entrenched environmental challenges arising from agriculture. The curriculum combined instructional techniques, disciplinary experts, and farmers to explore the complexities of the agricultural system in which participants worked. Two cohorts of conservation practitioners (n = 20 and 23) working for 17 organizations participated in 20–21 sessions. Ninety-eight percent of participants agreed participation made them better conservation practitioners. Significant majorities reported increased knowledge about agriculture (100%), conservation (85%), private land decision making (90%), and behavior change (95%). Participants increased empathy toward farmers (+24.9%), increased communication self-efficacy (+15.3%), and improved intention to apply behavior change principles (+49.4%). Comparable professional development interventions may be implemented in similar contexts to foster greater conservation adoption and ultimately reduce entrenched negative environmental externalities.

赋予从事农业保护工作的从业者权力
全球对食物、燃料和纤维的需求不断增长,在一些农业景观中产生了一系列负面的环境外部性,而保护措施试图解决这些问题。但是,私营部门采取的保护措施往往是不够的。保护工作者促进了采用,但他们往往缺乏对他们工作的农业生产系统的了解。我们制定了一项专业发展计划,帮助环保从业者更好地了解农业和农民,使他们能够在美国一个因农业而面临根深蒂固的环境挑战的州增加环保的采用。课程将教学技术、学科专家和农民结合起来,探索参与者工作的农业系统的复杂性。来自17个组织的两组保护从业者(n = 20和23)参加了20 - 21次会议。98%的参与者认为,参与活动使他们成为更好的环保工作者。绝大多数人报告说,他们增加了对农业(100%)、保护(85%)、私人土地决策(90%)和行为改变(95%)的知识。参与者增加了对农民的同理心(+24.9%),增加了沟通自我效能(+15.3%),提高了应用行为改变原则的意愿(+49.4%)。可以在类似的情况下实施类似的专业发展干预措施,以促进更多地采用保护措施,并最终减少根深蒂固的负面环境外部性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书