A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway

IF 3.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology Pub Date : 2026-10-07 Epub Date: 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1002/ghg.70045
Benjamin Emmel, Ole-Andre Roli, Maxence Vergne, Guilhem Hauguel, Bastien Dupuy
{"title":"A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway","authors":"Benjamin Emmel,&nbsp;Ole-Andre Roli,&nbsp;Maxence Vergne,&nbsp;Guilhem Hauguel,&nbsp;Bastien Dupuy","doi":"10.1002/ghg.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open-source, QGIS-based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy-well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method-dependent nature of legacy-well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi-criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early-stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"16 5","pages":"746-757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO2 storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open-source, QGIS-based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy-well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO2 storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method-dependent nature of legacy-well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi-criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early-stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO2 storage projects.

评估CO2储存许可范围内遗留井的筛选方法的比较:在挪威近海的应用
对于海上二氧化碳封存项目来说,遗留井是一个重要的考虑因素,因为如果建造不当、未记录或未充分废弃,遗留井可能为流体或气体的运移提供潜在的途径。由于数据的异构性和现有评估方法的多样性,对大量遗留井进行系统评估仍然具有挑战性。该研究提出了一个开源的、基于qgis的框架,该框架集成了井的建设数据、地质背景和多种既定的筛选方法,从而实现了在许可规模上透明、可重复的遗留井筛选。该框架适用于挪威大陆架的两个海上二氧化碳储存许可证区域,涵盖了几十年来钻探的遗留井,反映了一系列建设和废弃实践。结果表明,对于同一口井,不同的筛分方法会产生系统不同的分类,这凸显了遗留井筛分的方法依赖性。在许可区域内和不同区域之间的筛选结果差异很大,不能单独用钻井年份或井深等单个井属性来解释,这强调了多标准筛选方法的必要性,而不是依赖单一代理。分析了一小部分以前报道过的海底天然气产气井,进行了背景比较。这些井的筛分结果不均匀,而且量化甲烷通量数据的可用性有限,因此无法对筛分结果与泄漏行为之间的关系进行一般性推断。所提出的框架不能取代详细的油井完整性分析或风险评估。相反,它为许可证级别的遗留井的早期筛选和优先排序提供了一种实用、透明和空间化的方法,支持海上二氧化碳储存项目的现场评估和监管审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书