Benjamin Emmel, Ole-Andre Roli, Maxence Vergne, Guilhem Hauguel, Bastien Dupuy
{"title":"A Comparison of Screening Methods for Assessing Legacy Wells Within CO2 Storage Licences: Application to Offshore Norway","authors":"Benjamin Emmel, Ole-Andre Roli, Maxence Vergne, Guilhem Hauguel, Bastien Dupuy","doi":"10.1002/ghg.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open-source, QGIS-based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy-well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method-dependent nature of legacy-well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi-criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early-stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO<sub>2</sub> storage projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"16 5","pages":"746-757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Legacy wells represent a critical consideration for offshore CO2 storage projects, as they may provide potential pathways for fluid or gas migration if poorly constructed, undocumented or inadequately abandoned. Systematically assessing large numbers of legacy wells remains challenging due to heterogeneous data availability and the diversity of existing evaluation approaches. This study presents an open-source, QGIS-based framework that integrates well construction data, geological context and multiple established screening methodologies to enable transparent and reproducible legacy-well screening at the licence scale. The framework is applied to two offshore CO2 storage licence areas on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, covering legacy wells drilled across several decades and reflecting a range of construction and abandonment practices. The results show that different screening methods produce systematically different classifications when applied to the same wells, highlighting the method-dependent nature of legacy-well screening. Screening outcomes vary substantially within and between licence areas and cannot be explained by individual well attributes such as drilling year or well depth alone, underscoring the need for multi-criteria screening approaches rather than reliance on single proxies. A small subset of wells with previously reported seabed gas occurrences was analysed for contextual comparison. These wells display heterogeneous screening outcomes, and the limited availability of quantified methane flux data precludes any general inference regarding relationships between screening results and leakage behaviour. The presented framework does not replace detailed well integrity analysis or risk assessment. Instead, it provides a practical, transparent and spatially enabled approach for early-stage screening and prioritisation of legacy wells at the licence level, supporting site evaluation and regulatory review in offshore CO2 storage projects.
期刊介绍:
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies.
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd