Risk Spillovers: When Politics Meets Sustainability

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2026-10-05 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.70044
Feng Dong, Son Wilson
{"title":"Risk Spillovers: When Politics Meets Sustainability","authors":"Feng Dong,&nbsp;Son Wilson","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the relationship between firms’ political risk and their susceptibility to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Using quarterly data of U.S. public firms from 2019 to 2022, we find that firms exposed to higher uncertainty in political matters have higher exposure to financial risk caused by material ESG issues. While previous studies report that, as political volatility rises, firms invest more in sustainability-related activities to maintain legitimacy, we show empirical evidence that corporate ESG risk scores still increase in the face of heightened political risk, suggesting that their ESG initiatives in reaction to political instability are ineffective in mitigating firms’ exposure to ESG challenges. Political uncertainty creates negative sentiment toward political matters, which can signal an unfavorable environment for long-term sustainability developments, or higher ESG risks for firms. Our results also show that some strategic attributes, such as international presence and CEOs’ generalist skills, can protect firms’ ESG risk profiles from political turbulence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"37 4","pages":"109-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between firms’ political risk and their susceptibility to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Using quarterly data of U.S. public firms from 2019 to 2022, we find that firms exposed to higher uncertainty in political matters have higher exposure to financial risk caused by material ESG issues. While previous studies report that, as political volatility rises, firms invest more in sustainability-related activities to maintain legitimacy, we show empirical evidence that corporate ESG risk scores still increase in the face of heightened political risk, suggesting that their ESG initiatives in reaction to political instability are ineffective in mitigating firms’ exposure to ESG challenges. Political uncertainty creates negative sentiment toward political matters, which can signal an unfavorable environment for long-term sustainability developments, or higher ESG risks for firms. Our results also show that some strategic attributes, such as international presence and CEOs’ generalist skills, can protect firms’ ESG risk profiles from political turbulence.

风险溢出:当政治遇到可持续性
本研究考察了企业政治风险与其对环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的敏感性之间的关系。利用2019年至2022年美国上市公司的季度数据,我们发现,面临较高政治不确定性的公司面临的重大ESG问题带来的财务风险更高。虽然之前的研究表明,随着政治波动性的上升,企业会更多地投资于与可持续性相关的活动,以保持合法性,但我们的实证证据表明,面对日益加剧的政治风险,企业ESG风险得分仍然会上升,这表明企业应对政治不稳定的ESG举措在减轻企业面临ESG挑战方面是无效的。政治不确定性导致人们对政治问题产生负面情绪,这可能预示着长期可持续发展的不利环境,或企业面临更高的ESG风险。我们的研究结果还表明,一些战略属性,如国际影响力和ceo的通才技能,可以保护公司的ESG风险概况免受政治动荡的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书