Can Natural Disasters and Financial Technology (FINTECH) Facilitate Trade in Low-Carbon Energy Source Technologies? An Empirical Evaluation From OECD Economies

IF 2.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geological Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-04 Epub Date: 2025-11-26 DOI:10.1002/gj.70136
Nazife Özge Beşer, Meral Çabaş, Said Khalfa Brika, Abdulkadir Barut, Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati
{"title":"Can Natural Disasters and Financial Technology (FINTECH) Facilitate Trade in Low-Carbon Energy Source Technologies? An Empirical Evaluation From OECD Economies","authors":"Nazife Özge Beşer,&nbsp;Meral Çabaş,&nbsp;Said Khalfa Brika,&nbsp;Abdulkadir Barut,&nbsp;Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati","doi":"10.1002/gj.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Countries around the world are taking various measures to combat climate change. Low-carbon energy technology development can significantly assist in addressing this issue. However, due to having fewer resources, not all countries can produce low-carbon energy and have to rely on the trade of low-carbon energy resources. The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of low-carbon energy technology trade (LOWT) in 36 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries between 2010 and 2020, and to examine the role of financial technology (FinTech) in this trade in particular. To this end, control variables such as natural disasters, per capita income, population, and institutional quality were also included in the model. Three different methods were used in the empirical analysis: System Generalised Method of Moments (System GMM), machine learning, and moment-based quantile regression panel method (MMQREG). These methods allow for the examination of both dynamic dependence and heterogeneous effects at the quantile level. The findings of the study show that the adoption of financial technology increases trade in low-carbon energy sources in OECD countries. The effects of other variables, such as natural disasters, were also found to be positive for participation in low-carbon energy trade, while institutional quality, income, and population improve this trade. However, according to the MMQREG estimate, population and institutional quality are not significant in higher percentiles. In light of these results, policymakers are advised to support FinTech-based green finance instruments and reduce trade barriers to low-carbon technologies. This approach is consistent with the Paris Climate Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) (particularly SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Journal","volume":"61 10","pages":"3220-3233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gj.70136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countries around the world are taking various measures to combat climate change. Low-carbon energy technology development can significantly assist in addressing this issue. However, due to having fewer resources, not all countries can produce low-carbon energy and have to rely on the trade of low-carbon energy resources. The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of low-carbon energy technology trade (LOWT) in 36 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries between 2010 and 2020, and to examine the role of financial technology (FinTech) in this trade in particular. To this end, control variables such as natural disasters, per capita income, population, and institutional quality were also included in the model. Three different methods were used in the empirical analysis: System Generalised Method of Moments (System GMM), machine learning, and moment-based quantile regression panel method (MMQREG). These methods allow for the examination of both dynamic dependence and heterogeneous effects at the quantile level. The findings of the study show that the adoption of financial technology increases trade in low-carbon energy sources in OECD countries. The effects of other variables, such as natural disasters, were also found to be positive for participation in low-carbon energy trade, while institutional quality, income, and population improve this trade. However, according to the MMQREG estimate, population and institutional quality are not significant in higher percentiles. In light of these results, policymakers are advised to support FinTech-based green finance instruments and reduce trade barriers to low-carbon technologies. This approach is consistent with the Paris Climate Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) (particularly SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

自然灾害和金融科技能促进低碳能源技术贸易吗?来自经合组织经济体的实证评价
世界各国正在采取各种措施应对气候变化。低碳能源技术的发展可以大大有助于解决这一问题。然而,由于资源较少,并不是所有国家都能生产低碳能源,必须依靠低碳能源的贸易。本研究的目的是调查2010年至2020年间36个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的低碳能源技术贸易(LOWT)的决定因素,并特别研究金融技术(FinTech)在这种贸易中的作用。为此,模型中还纳入了自然灾害、人均收入、人口、制度质量等控制变量。在实证分析中使用了三种不同的方法:系统广义矩量法(System GMM)、机器学习和基于矩的分位数回归面板法(MMQREG)。这些方法允许在分位数水平上检查动态依赖性和异质性效应。研究结果表明,金融技术的采用增加了经合组织国家的低碳能源贸易。其他变量(如自然灾害)对参与低碳能源贸易也有积极影响,而制度质量、收入和人口对低碳能源贸易有促进作用。然而,根据MMQREG的估计,人口和机构质量在较高的百分位数上并不显著。根据这些结果,建议政策制定者支持基于金融科技的绿色金融工具,减少对低碳技术的贸易壁垒。这一方针符合《巴黎气候协定》和联合国可持续发展目标(SDG)(特别是可持续发展目标7:负担得起的清洁能源,可持续发展目标16:和平、正义和强有力的机构)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geological Journal
Geological Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
269
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: In recent years there has been a growth of specialist journals within geological sciences. Nevertheless, there is an important role for a journal of an interdisciplinary kind. Traditionally, GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL has been such a journal and continues in its aim of promoting interest in all branches of the Geological Sciences, through publication of original research papers and review articles. The journal publishes Special Issues with a common theme or regional coverage e.g. Chinese Dinosaurs; Tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean, Triassic basins of the Central and North Atlantic Borderlands). These are extensively cited. The Journal has a particular interest in publishing papers on regional case studies from any global locality which have conclusions of general interest. Such papers may emphasize aspects across the full spectrum of geological sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书