Caitlin M. Lancaster, Christopher Flathmann, Jennifer Hsu, Nathan J. McNeese, Thomas A. O'Neill, Eduardo Salas
{"title":"Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI-Integrated Work","authors":"Caitlin M. Lancaster, Christopher Flathmann, Jennifer Hsu, Nathan J. McNeese, Thomas A. O'Neill, Eduardo Salas","doi":"10.1002/job.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As organizations increasingly adopt human-AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise-based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes (<i>N</i> = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI-integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio-emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"47 8","pages":"1438-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As organizations increasingly adopt human-AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise-based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes (N = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI-integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio-emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.