Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI-Integrated Work

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2026-10-07 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1002/job.70036
Caitlin M. Lancaster, Christopher Flathmann, Jennifer Hsu, Nathan J. McNeese, Thomas A. O'Neill, Eduardo Salas
{"title":"Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI-Integrated Work","authors":"Caitlin M. Lancaster,&nbsp;Christopher Flathmann,&nbsp;Jennifer Hsu,&nbsp;Nathan J. McNeese,&nbsp;Thomas A. O'Neill,&nbsp;Eduardo Salas","doi":"10.1002/job.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As organizations increasingly adopt human-AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise-based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes (<i>N</i> = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI-integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio-emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"47 8","pages":"1438-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As organizations increasingly adopt human-AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise-based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes (N = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI-integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio-emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.

为未来的团队合作做准备:从电子竞技中了解人类专业知识如何塑造人工智能集成工作的培训需求
随着组织越来越多地采用人工智能团队(hat),了解如何提高团队绩效是至关重要的。支持HATs的一个关键的未开发领域是培训,特别是帮助人类队友与这些无机对手一起工作。事实上,关于HATs培训的研究是有限的,通常依赖于人类团队培训框架,未能考虑到人类基于专业知识的培训需求以及这可能如何影响与AI的协作。为了弥补这一差距,我们采访了有人工智能训练经验的竞技电子竞技运动员(N = 22),讨论了当前人类与人工智能训练中的差距,以及他们对未来训练的期望,以更好地支持人类在人工智能集成工作中。使用定量人种学(QE)工具,认知网络分析(ENA),我们检查了这些培训需求,以及它们如何根据参与者的任务专业知识而变化。我们的研究结果表明,目前的培训方法侧重于使用人工智能进行任务培训,由于对该任务重点的不同看法,以及与平衡适应性与可预测性相关的紧张关系,以及对人工智能培训的冲突态度,发现了显著的专业差异。未来的培训必须不断发展,以加深人类与人工智能之间的理解和信任,重点关注社会情感纽带和角色意识,为团队合作带来更大的好处。最后,我们提出三项可行的组织研究建议,以便将这些研究结果推广到更广泛的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书