Key practices for ethical research during scientific expeditions

IF 2.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Science and Practice Pub Date : 2026-10-05 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1111/csp2.70379
Nelsy Niño-Rodríguez, Camila Gómez, Juliana Soto-Patiño, Andrés M. Cuervo, Andrés Sierra-Ricaurte, Natalia Pérez-Amaya, Carlos Del Cairo, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Jessica Díaz-Cárdenas, David Ocampo, Carolina Soto-Vargas, Daniel J. Mennill, Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela
{"title":"Key practices for ethical research during scientific expeditions","authors":"Nelsy Niño-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Camila Gómez,&nbsp;Juliana Soto-Patiño,&nbsp;Andrés M. Cuervo,&nbsp;Andrés Sierra-Ricaurte,&nbsp;Natalia Pérez-Amaya,&nbsp;Carlos Del Cairo,&nbsp;Carlos Daniel Cadena,&nbsp;Jessica Díaz-Cárdenas,&nbsp;David Ocampo,&nbsp;Carolina Soto-Vargas,&nbsp;Daniel J. Mennill,&nbsp;Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientific expeditions are crucial for creating new knowledge. The term itself carries strong colonial associations and a legacy of extractive practices. In many cases, expeditionary practices undermined local knowledge and expertise. Here, we advocate for a shift from “parachute science” towards collaborative approaches that incorporate diverse expertise, perspectives, languages, and knowledge systems, strengthening local capacities and focusing on developing and supporting ethical, long-term partnerships. Building on recent publications that encourage a more equitable and respectful fieldwork environment, and drawing on our experiences, we synthesize some previously proposed practices and develop new ones. We reflect on and suggest best practices during scientific expeditions within research teams and in the team's interactions with different communities, from project planning and fieldwork to data management, publication, and outreach. By emphasizing transparency and mutual respect, this collaborative approach enhances scientific outcomes and the societal impact of research. Furthermore, the practices proposed here apply to any kind of fieldwork, not just scientific expeditions, making them valuable across diverse cultural, social, and environmental contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70379","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific expeditions are crucial for creating new knowledge. The term itself carries strong colonial associations and a legacy of extractive practices. In many cases, expeditionary practices undermined local knowledge and expertise. Here, we advocate for a shift from “parachute science” towards collaborative approaches that incorporate diverse expertise, perspectives, languages, and knowledge systems, strengthening local capacities and focusing on developing and supporting ethical, long-term partnerships. Building on recent publications that encourage a more equitable and respectful fieldwork environment, and drawing on our experiences, we synthesize some previously proposed practices and develop new ones. We reflect on and suggest best practices during scientific expeditions within research teams and in the team's interactions with different communities, from project planning and fieldwork to data management, publication, and outreach. By emphasizing transparency and mutual respect, this collaborative approach enhances scientific outcomes and the societal impact of research. Furthermore, the practices proposed here apply to any kind of fieldwork, not just scientific expeditions, making them valuable across diverse cultural, social, and environmental contexts.

科学考察中伦理研究的关键实践
科学考察对创造新知识至关重要。这个词本身带有强烈的殖民联想和采掘实践的遗产。在许多情况下,远征的实践破坏了当地的知识和专业知识。在这方面,我们提倡从“空降科学”转向合作方法,将不同的专业知识、观点、语言和知识系统结合起来,加强地方能力,并注重发展和支持合乎道德的长期伙伴关系。基于最近的出版物,鼓励更公平和尊重的实地工作环境,并借鉴我们的经验,我们综合了一些以前提出的做法,并开发了新的做法。我们在研究团队的科学考察以及团队与不同社区的互动中反思并提出最佳实践,从项目规划和实地考察到数据管理、出版和推广。通过强调透明度和相互尊重,这种合作方式提高了科学成果和研究的社会影响。此外,这里提出的实践适用于任何类型的实地考察,而不仅仅是科学考察,这使得它们在不同的文化、社会和环境背景下都具有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书