{"title":"‘The Bethune College Sensation’: Gender, Archive and Radical Passivity","authors":"Meghmala Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the student protests at Bethune College, Calcutta, on 3 February 1928, against the Simon Commission, a British parliamentary delegation that excluded Indian representation. On this day, female students staged a quiet but radical act of defiance by refusing to attend classes, sign apologies or vacate their hostel, despite threats of expulsion from Principal Gertrude Marian Wright. These acts of refusal exemplify what Agamben (1998) terms ‘radical passivity’, a quiet yet potent resistance that unsettled colonial authority and disrupted established gendered and infantilising narratives of student activism. The Bethune protests are situated within the broader context of colonial education in Bengal, which was simultaneously a tool of imperial control and a site of political dissent. Educational institutions, especially women's colleges, became spaces of revolutionary activity, challenging the colonial government's attempts to depoliticise education. Drawing on archival records, nationalist historiography, and multilingual sources, this article critiques the masculinist framing of the protests and re-centres the experiences of women, who were often reduced to symbolic figures in historical narratives. By adopting feminist historiographical approaches, the article reimagines archival practices to foreground women's voices, revealing the complexities of resistance in colonial Bengal and highlighting the generative intersection of education, gender and political activism.</p>","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"38 3","pages":"882-894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores the student protests at Bethune College, Calcutta, on 3 February 1928, against the Simon Commission, a British parliamentary delegation that excluded Indian representation. On this day, female students staged a quiet but radical act of defiance by refusing to attend classes, sign apologies or vacate their hostel, despite threats of expulsion from Principal Gertrude Marian Wright. These acts of refusal exemplify what Agamben (1998) terms ‘radical passivity’, a quiet yet potent resistance that unsettled colonial authority and disrupted established gendered and infantilising narratives of student activism. The Bethune protests are situated within the broader context of colonial education in Bengal, which was simultaneously a tool of imperial control and a site of political dissent. Educational institutions, especially women's colleges, became spaces of revolutionary activity, challenging the colonial government's attempts to depoliticise education. Drawing on archival records, nationalist historiography, and multilingual sources, this article critiques the masculinist framing of the protests and re-centres the experiences of women, who were often reduced to symbolic figures in historical narratives. By adopting feminist historiographical approaches, the article reimagines archival practices to foreground women's voices, revealing the complexities of resistance in colonial Bengal and highlighting the generative intersection of education, gender and political activism.
本文探讨了1928年2月3日,加尔各答白求恩学院的学生抗议英国议会代表团西蒙委员会排除印度代表的事件。这一天,尽管校长格特鲁德·玛丽安·赖特(Gertrude Marian Wright)威胁要开除她们,但女学生们采取了一种安静但激进的反抗行动,拒绝上课、签署道歉信或离开宿舍。这些拒绝行为体现了Agamben(1998)所说的“激进的被动性”,这是一种安静而有力的抵抗,动摇了殖民当局,破坏了既定的性别化和幼稚化的学生行动主义叙事。白求恩抗议活动是在孟加拉殖民地教育的大背景下进行的,孟加拉既是帝国控制的工具,也是政治异见的场所。教育机构,尤其是女子学院,成为革命活动的场所,挑战殖民政府将教育去政治化的企图。借助档案记录、民族主义史学和多语言资料,本文批评了抗议活动的男性主义框架,并重新关注女性的经历,她们在历史叙事中往往被贬低为象征性人物。通过采用女权主义史学方法,本文重新想象了档案实践,以突出女性的声音,揭示了殖民时期孟加拉抵抗的复杂性,并强调了教育、性别和政治激进主义的生成交叉点。
期刊介绍:
Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.