Uneven Alignment of Economic, Functional, and Rail-Accessibility Centralities in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, 2000–2020

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Kyungmo Sung
{"title":"Uneven Alignment of Economic, Functional, and Rail-Accessibility Centralities in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, 2000–2020","authors":"Kyungmo Sung","doi":"10.1111/grow.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines how alignment among economic, OD-based functional, and rail-accessibility dimensions of centrality changed in the Seoul Metropolitan Area and which municipal changes were associated with 2020 mismatch. We construct separate measures from land-price and economic-activity data, OD flows, and station-based rail-accessibility indicators for 59 municipalities observed at five target years from 2000 to 2020. Mean rank mismatch increased from 0.182 to 0.243, while Kendall's W declined from 0.748 to 0.604. The economic-functional gap accounted for 50.2% of the increase, although it remained the smallest pairwise gap in 2020. Mismatch showed substantial but incomplete temporal persistence. After accounting for baseline mismatch and metropolitan location, municipalities with larger increases in the share of residents aged 65 and older had lower 2020 mismatch; estimates for changes in one-person-household and manufacturing-employment shares were imprecise. Economic concentration, realized mobility, and rail accessibility therefore became less consistently aligned over the study period. For planning and center identification, a single centrality dimension may conceal municipalities whose economic, functional, and accessibility profiles diverge.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how alignment among economic, OD-based functional, and rail-accessibility dimensions of centrality changed in the Seoul Metropolitan Area and which municipal changes were associated with 2020 mismatch. We construct separate measures from land-price and economic-activity data, OD flows, and station-based rail-accessibility indicators for 59 municipalities observed at five target years from 2000 to 2020. Mean rank mismatch increased from 0.182 to 0.243, while Kendall's W declined from 0.748 to 0.604. The economic-functional gap accounted for 50.2% of the increase, although it remained the smallest pairwise gap in 2020. Mismatch showed substantial but incomplete temporal persistence. After accounting for baseline mismatch and metropolitan location, municipalities with larger increases in the share of residents aged 65 and older had lower 2020 mismatch; estimates for changes in one-person-household and manufacturing-employment shares were imprecise. Economic concentration, realized mobility, and rail accessibility therefore became less consistently aligned over the study period. For planning and center identification, a single centrality dimension may conceal municipalities whose economic, functional, and accessibility profiles diverge.

2000-2020年首都圈经济、功能和铁路可达性中心的不均衡排列
本研究探讨了首尔都市圈中心性的经济、基于od的功能和铁路可达性维度之间的一致性是如何变化的,以及哪些市政变化与2020年的失配有关。我们根据土地价格和经济活动数据、OD流量和基于车站的铁路可达性指标构建了单独的衡量标准,这些指标是在2000年至2020年的五个目标年份观察到的59个城市的。平均等级错配从0.182增加到0.243,Kendall’s W从0.748下降到0.604。经济功能差距占增量的50.2%,尽管这仍然是2020年最小的两两差距。失配表现出大量但不完全的时间持久性。在考虑基线错配和大都市位置后,65岁及以上居民比例增幅较大的城市2020年错配率较低;对一人家庭和制造业就业份额变化的估计并不精确。因此,在研究期间,经济集中度、实现的流动性和铁路可达性变得不那么一致。在规划和中心识别方面,单一的中心性维度可能会掩盖那些经济、功能和可达性不同的城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书