Abdominal MRI-Derived Liver, Visceral Fat, and Pancreatic Phenotypes Improve Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ruotong Peng, Xuyang Diao, Yiwen Dai, Jingxin Chen, Linqing Zhu, Menghan Zhu, Xinqing Yang, Yang Pan, Yuling Liu, Darui Gao, Yanyu Zhang, Mengmeng Ji, Wuxiang Xie, Fanfan Zheng
{"title":"Abdominal MRI-Derived Liver, Visceral Fat, and Pancreatic Phenotypes Improve Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Ruotong Peng,&nbsp;Xuyang Diao,&nbsp;Yiwen Dai,&nbsp;Jingxin Chen,&nbsp;Linqing Zhu,&nbsp;Menghan Zhu,&nbsp;Xinqing Yang,&nbsp;Yang Pan,&nbsp;Yuling Liu,&nbsp;Darui Gao,&nbsp;Yanyu Zhang,&nbsp;Mengmeng Ji,&nbsp;Wuxiang Xie,&nbsp;Fanfan Zheng","doi":"10.1002/dmrr.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate whether abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived metabolic phenotypes improve the opportunistic prediction of incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) beyond clinical risk models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 36,833 UK Biobank participants who underwent abdominal MRI and were free of T2D at imaging baseline. The original Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS) was evaluated, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was added to form the clinical CDRS model. MRI phenotypes were selected using a LASSO-based selection-frequency analysis and added to construct the clinical CDRS-MRI model. Model performance was assessed in an internal validation set using Harrell's C-index, continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a median follow-up of 7.38 years, 570 participants developed incident T2D. The selection-frequency analysis retained four MRI phenotypes: liver proton density fat fraction, liver volume, visceral fat volume, and pancreas volume. In the internal validation set, C-indices were 0.765 (95% CI, 0.731–0.800) for the original CDRS model, 0.820 (95% CI, 0.786–0.849) for the clinical CDRS model, and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.818–0.877) for the clinical CDRS-MRI model. The clinical CDRS-MRI model improved the C-index by 0.084 versus the original CDRS model and by 0.029 versus the clinical CDRS model, with a continuous NRI of 56.2% (95% CI, 40.6%–70.0%) and an IDI of 0.022 (95% CI, 0.010–0.037).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Abdominal MRI-derived phenotypes improved the prediction of incident T2D beyond established clinical risk models. These findings support secondary use of available abdominal MRI data for metabolic risk stratification, pending external validation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11335,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.70235","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate whether abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived metabolic phenotypes improve the opportunistic prediction of incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) beyond clinical risk models.

Materials and Methods

This study included 36,833 UK Biobank participants who underwent abdominal MRI and were free of T2D at imaging baseline. The original Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS) was evaluated, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was added to form the clinical CDRS model. MRI phenotypes were selected using a LASSO-based selection-frequency analysis and added to construct the clinical CDRS-MRI model. Model performance was assessed in an internal validation set using Harrell's C-index, continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results

During a median follow-up of 7.38 years, 570 participants developed incident T2D. The selection-frequency analysis retained four MRI phenotypes: liver proton density fat fraction, liver volume, visceral fat volume, and pancreas volume. In the internal validation set, C-indices were 0.765 (95% CI, 0.731–0.800) for the original CDRS model, 0.820 (95% CI, 0.786–0.849) for the clinical CDRS model, and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.818–0.877) for the clinical CDRS-MRI model. The clinical CDRS-MRI model improved the C-index by 0.084 versus the original CDRS model and by 0.029 versus the clinical CDRS model, with a continuous NRI of 56.2% (95% CI, 40.6%–70.0%) and an IDI of 0.022 (95% CI, 0.010–0.037).

Conclusions

Abdominal MRI-derived phenotypes improved the prediction of incident T2D beyond established clinical risk models. These findings support secondary use of available abdominal MRI data for metabolic risk stratification, pending external validation.

腹部mri来源的肝脏、内脏脂肪和胰腺表型改善2型糖尿病的预测
目的评估腹部磁共振成像(MRI)衍生的代谢表型是否能改善2型糖尿病(T2D)发生的机会性预测,超越临床风险模型。材料和方法本研究包括36,833名英国生物银行参与者,他们接受了腹部MRI检查,在成像基线时没有T2D。评估原始的剑桥糖尿病风险评分(CDRS),并加入糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),形成临床CDRS模型。使用基于lasso的选择频率分析选择MRI表型,并添加到临床CDRS-MRI模型中。采用Harrell’sc指数、连续净再分类改进(NRI)和综合区分改进(IDI)在内部验证集中评估模型的性能。在中位随访7.38年期间,570名参与者发生T2D事件。选择频率分析保留了四种MRI表型:肝脏质子密度脂肪分数,肝脏体积,内脏脂肪体积和胰腺体积。在内部验证集中,原始CDRS模型的c -指数为0.765 (95% CI, 0.731-0.800),临床CDRS模型的c -指数为0.820 (95% CI, 0.786-0.849),临床CDRS- mri模型的c -指数为0.849 (95% CI, 0.818-0.877)。临床CDRS- mri模型比原始CDRS模型提高了0.084,比临床CDRS模型提高了0.029,连续NRI为56.2% (95% CI, 40.6% ~ 70.0%), IDI为0.022 (95% CI, 0.010 ~ 0.037)。结论:腹部mri衍生的表型改善了T2D事件的预测,超出了既定的临床风险模型。这些发现支持利用现有的腹部MRI数据进行代谢风险分层,有待外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews is a premier endocrinology and metabolism journal esteemed by clinicians and researchers alike. Encompassing a wide spectrum of topics including diabetes, endocrinology, metabolism, and obesity, the journal eagerly accepts submissions ranging from clinical studies to basic and translational research, as well as reviews exploring historical progress, controversial issues, and prominent opinions in the field. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the realm of diabetes and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书