{"title":"A study of Ni-Co/CeO2 catalyst derived from metal–organic framework for dry reforming of methane","authors":"Ruth D. Alli, Nader Mahinpey","doi":"10.1002/cjce.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The efficacy of cobalt-doped, MOF-derived catalysts for dry reforming of methane (DRM) was examined. The focus was on the influence of varying nickel and cobalt molar ratios on catalytic performance. Three catalysts with Ni:Co ratios of 1:1, 1:0.5, and 0.5:1, were synthesized and tested with cerium oxide as a constant support. The DRM reaction was conducted at a low temperature of 700°C for 24 h. Despite the low reaction temperature, the catalyst containing an equimolar ratio of Ni and Co demonstrated the highest performance, achieving CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> conversions of 91% and 84%, respectively, with an H<sub>2</sub>/CO ratio of 0.96. A decrease in the loading of either nickel or cobalt reduced catalytic activity. The better performance of the Ni:Co (1:1) catalyst compared to Ni:Co (1:0.5) and Ni:Co (0.5:1) catalysts can be attributed to its smallest cobalt crystallite size of 1.6 nm, indicating better metal dispersion compared to the other catalysts. Smaller crystallite sizes enhance the availability of active sites, improve metal–support interaction, and promote efficient CO<sub>2</sub> activation. This improved dispersion likely contributed to the superior catalytic performance and coke resistance observed in the Ni(1)-Co(1)-Ce catalyst. The findings emphasize the critical role of active metal loading in achieving optimal DRM performance in the design of MOF-derived multi-metallic catalysts for DRM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"104 11","pages":"5921-5930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.70161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.70161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficacy of cobalt-doped, MOF-derived catalysts for dry reforming of methane (DRM) was examined. The focus was on the influence of varying nickel and cobalt molar ratios on catalytic performance. Three catalysts with Ni:Co ratios of 1:1, 1:0.5, and 0.5:1, were synthesized and tested with cerium oxide as a constant support. The DRM reaction was conducted at a low temperature of 700°C for 24 h. Despite the low reaction temperature, the catalyst containing an equimolar ratio of Ni and Co demonstrated the highest performance, achieving CO2 and CH4 conversions of 91% and 84%, respectively, with an H2/CO ratio of 0.96. A decrease in the loading of either nickel or cobalt reduced catalytic activity. The better performance of the Ni:Co (1:1) catalyst compared to Ni:Co (1:0.5) and Ni:Co (0.5:1) catalysts can be attributed to its smallest cobalt crystallite size of 1.6 nm, indicating better metal dispersion compared to the other catalysts. Smaller crystallite sizes enhance the availability of active sites, improve metal–support interaction, and promote efficient CO2 activation. This improved dispersion likely contributed to the superior catalytic performance and coke resistance observed in the Ni(1)-Co(1)-Ce catalyst. The findings emphasize the critical role of active metal loading in achieving optimal DRM performance in the design of MOF-derived multi-metallic catalysts for DRM.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.