Taiwan’s de facto operational role in India’s Act East Policy

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Sana Hashmi, Alan H Yang
{"title":"Taiwan’s de facto operational role in India’s Act East Policy","authors":"Sana Hashmi,&nbsp;Alan H Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10308-026-00786-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although Taiwan remains formally absent from India’s Act East Policy (AEP) due to diplomatic constraints, its expanding economic, technological, and strategic engagement warrants a reassessment of how the policy operates in practice. This article bridges the gap between the AEP’s declaratory framework and its operational implementation, arguing that Taiwan has emerged as a de facto and functionally embedded participant in India’s eastward strategy. Since the 1990s, and more markedly under the Narendra Modi government, India–Taiwan cooperation has expanded across trade, investment, science and technology, education, and semiconductor collaboration in ways that closely align with core Act East objectives, including economic connectivity, technological upgrading, and supply chain diversification. Through informal, sector-specific, and non-diplomatic mechanisms, India has accommodated Taiwan within the implementation of the AEP despite the absence of formal diplomatic recognition. In this context, the article adopts a functional and analytical lens to establish that the policy outcomes, rather than formal policy texts, help understand Taiwan’s role within the AEP. It contends that Taiwan occupies a consequential yet an analytically underexamined position within the AEP when assessed through operational alignment, policy instruments, and strategic practice rather than declaratory inclusion alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"799 - 816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-026-00786-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Taiwan remains formally absent from India’s Act East Policy (AEP) due to diplomatic constraints, its expanding economic, technological, and strategic engagement warrants a reassessment of how the policy operates in practice. This article bridges the gap between the AEP’s declaratory framework and its operational implementation, arguing that Taiwan has emerged as a de facto and functionally embedded participant in India’s eastward strategy. Since the 1990s, and more markedly under the Narendra Modi government, India–Taiwan cooperation has expanded across trade, investment, science and technology, education, and semiconductor collaboration in ways that closely align with core Act East objectives, including economic connectivity, technological upgrading, and supply chain diversification. Through informal, sector-specific, and non-diplomatic mechanisms, India has accommodated Taiwan within the implementation of the AEP despite the absence of formal diplomatic recognition. In this context, the article adopts a functional and analytical lens to establish that the policy outcomes, rather than formal policy texts, help understand Taiwan’s role within the AEP. It contends that Taiwan occupies a consequential yet an analytically underexamined position within the AEP when assessed through operational alignment, policy instruments, and strategic practice rather than declaratory inclusion alone.

台湾在印度“东向行动”政策中的实际操作角色
尽管由于外交限制,台湾仍然正式缺席印度的“东向行动政策”(AEP),但其不断扩大的经济、技术和战略接触,需要重新评估该政策在实践中的运作方式。本文弥合了AEP宣言框架与其实际实施之间的差距,认为台湾已成为印度东进战略中事实上和功能上的参与者。自20世纪90年代以来,特别是在纳伦德拉·莫迪(Narendra Modi)政府领导下,印度与台湾的合作已扩展到贸易、投资、科技、教育和半导体合作领域,其方式与“东方行动”的核心目标密切相关,包括经济互联互通、技术升级和供应链多样化。尽管没有正式的外交承认,但通过非正式的、针对特定部门的非外交机制,印度已将台湾纳入AEP的实施范围。在此背景下,本文采用功能和分析的视角来确立政策结果,而不是正式的政策文本,有助于理解台湾在亚太经济伙伴关系中的角色。它认为,当通过操作一致性、政策工具和战略实践而不是仅仅通过宣言纳入来评估时,台湾在AEP中占有重要的地位,但在分析上却没有得到充分的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书