India and China as ASEAN’s partners in the Indo-Pacific

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Rahul Mishra
{"title":"India and China as ASEAN’s partners in the Indo-Pacific","authors":"Rahul Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s10308-026-00793-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Southeast Asia is often described as a confluence zone situated between the South of China and East of India. ASEAN and its affiliate institutions, as manifestations of Southeast Asian regional aspirations, are at the centre stage of the Indo-Pacific region, directly impacted by the major power politics involving not just the US–China dynamics but the growing role of India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand, Russia, and the European Union as well. Notwithstanding initial successes and failures of post-War Asian regionalism, Indian and Chinese institutional engagement with ASEAN only began during the 1990s. Over the past three-and-a-half decades, ASEAN’s ties with both India and China have progressed well with the region attracting greater diplomatic competition among stakeholders vying for economic and soft power influence as well as strategic leverage. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which Southeast Asian engagement with China and/or India could lead to polarisation or partnership. It also aims to examine the conditions under which the potential downside of polarisation competes with the benefits of the partnership. This paper argues that while ASEAN could exercise moderating influence on the two Asian giants in pursuing greater cooperation with the region, its ability to do so gets severely constrained if India–China relations take a more confrontational turn. In essence, ASEAN’s cooperation with China and India hinges on two critically important aspects: (1) China and India’s own interests and aspirations in the Indo-Pacific regional dynamics as well as their bilateral equations and (2) ASEAN’s ability to lead the regional discourse in favour of multipolarity and multilateralism by keeping its normative agency intact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"665 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-026-00793-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Southeast Asia is often described as a confluence zone situated between the South of China and East of India. ASEAN and its affiliate institutions, as manifestations of Southeast Asian regional aspirations, are at the centre stage of the Indo-Pacific region, directly impacted by the major power politics involving not just the US–China dynamics but the growing role of India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand, Russia, and the European Union as well. Notwithstanding initial successes and failures of post-War Asian regionalism, Indian and Chinese institutional engagement with ASEAN only began during the 1990s. Over the past three-and-a-half decades, ASEAN’s ties with both India and China have progressed well with the region attracting greater diplomatic competition among stakeholders vying for economic and soft power influence as well as strategic leverage. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which Southeast Asian engagement with China and/or India could lead to polarisation or partnership. It also aims to examine the conditions under which the potential downside of polarisation competes with the benefits of the partnership. This paper argues that while ASEAN could exercise moderating influence on the two Asian giants in pursuing greater cooperation with the region, its ability to do so gets severely constrained if India–China relations take a more confrontational turn. In essence, ASEAN’s cooperation with China and India hinges on two critically important aspects: (1) China and India’s own interests and aspirations in the Indo-Pacific regional dynamics as well as their bilateral equations and (2) ASEAN’s ability to lead the regional discourse in favour of multipolarity and multilateralism by keeping its normative agency intact.

印度和中国是东盟在印太地区的伙伴
东南亚通常被描述为位于中国南部和印度东部之间的汇合区。作为东南亚地区抱负的体现,东盟及其附属机构处于印度-太平洋地区的中心舞台,直接受到大国政治的影响,不仅包括美中关系,还包括印度、日本、澳大利亚、韩国、新西兰、俄罗斯和欧盟日益增长的作用。尽管战后亚洲地区主义在初期有成功也有失败,但印度和中国与东盟的制度性接触直到上世纪90年代才开始。在过去的35年里,东盟与印度和中国的关系进展良好,该地区吸引了利益相关者之间更大的外交竞争,争夺经济和软实力影响力以及战略杠杆。本文旨在分析东南亚与中国和/或印度的接触在多大程度上可能导致两极分化或伙伴关系。它还旨在研究两极分化的潜在负面影响与合作伙伴关系的好处相竞争的条件。本文认为,虽然东盟可以在寻求与该地区加强合作的过程中对这两个亚洲大国施加适度的影响,但如果印中关系转向更具对抗性,它的能力将受到严重限制。从本质上讲,东盟与中国和印度的合作取决于两个至关重要的方面:(1)中国和印度在印度-太平洋地区动态中的自身利益和愿望,以及它们的双边方程式;(2)东盟通过保持其规范机构的完整性,领导有利于多极化和多边主义的地区话语的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书