Conditions that can lead to biased kinetic parameters in reactions with enzymes simultaneously inhibited by reaction product and another inhibitor

IF 2.1 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Paula A. Pinto, João Matias, Albino A. Dias, Rui M. F. Bezerra
{"title":"Conditions that can lead to biased kinetic parameters in reactions with enzymes simultaneously inhibited by reaction product and another inhibitor","authors":"Paula A. Pinto,&nbsp;João Matias,&nbsp;Albino A. Dias,&nbsp;Rui M. F. Bezerra","doi":"10.1007/s11144-026-03171-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In reactions where the enzyme is inhibited by the product, using the classical method based on initial rates to determine kinetic parameters may give rise to biased values. In fact, under certain conditions, failure to include the effect of product inhibition may generate errors of such magnitude that estimated parameters may not deserve any credit. In this work, three substrate depletion thresholds were used to obtain initial rates in reactions inhibited by the product and by a second different inhibitor. Kinetic parameters were determined by Michaelis–Menten rate equation using initial rates obtained from the slopes of theoretical curves product <i>versus</i> time simulated by MATLAB (in silico data). Errors in estimated parameters, including those of second inhibitor (K<sub>ic2</sub> and K<sub>iu2</sub>), were quantified for each of the three substrate thresholds. As expected, in the absence of reaction product inhibition, i.e., when its inhibition constant tends towards infinity, minimal errors are observed in remaining estimated parameters. However, depending on the magnitude of product inhibition, percentage error in estimated parameter values can exceed 100%, being influenced by the parameter type (K<sub>ic2</sub> and K<sub>iu2</sub> are the most biased) and also by the substrate depletion threshold for determining initial rates (greater bias when substrate depletion exceeds 1%). In this work, we prove that when product inhibition occurs, the kinetic constants determined from the initial rates are generally subject to errors and, therefore, this is not a reliable method. Thus, in order to avoid determining potentially biased kinetic parameters values, we suggest an alternative methodology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":750,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis","volume":"139 5","pages":"4223 - 4239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11144-026-03171-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11144-026-03171-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reactions where the enzyme is inhibited by the product, using the classical method based on initial rates to determine kinetic parameters may give rise to biased values. In fact, under certain conditions, failure to include the effect of product inhibition may generate errors of such magnitude that estimated parameters may not deserve any credit. In this work, three substrate depletion thresholds were used to obtain initial rates in reactions inhibited by the product and by a second different inhibitor. Kinetic parameters were determined by Michaelis–Menten rate equation using initial rates obtained from the slopes of theoretical curves product versus time simulated by MATLAB (in silico data). Errors in estimated parameters, including those of second inhibitor (Kic2 and Kiu2), were quantified for each of the three substrate thresholds. As expected, in the absence of reaction product inhibition, i.e., when its inhibition constant tends towards infinity, minimal errors are observed in remaining estimated parameters. However, depending on the magnitude of product inhibition, percentage error in estimated parameter values can exceed 100%, being influenced by the parameter type (Kic2 and Kiu2 are the most biased) and also by the substrate depletion threshold for determining initial rates (greater bias when substrate depletion exceeds 1%). In this work, we prove that when product inhibition occurs, the kinetic constants determined from the initial rates are generally subject to errors and, therefore, this is not a reliable method. Thus, in order to avoid determining potentially biased kinetic parameters values, we suggest an alternative methodology.

在酶同时被反应产物和另一种抑制剂抑制的反应中,可能导致动力学参数偏倚的条件
在酶被产物抑制的反应中,使用基于初始速率的经典方法来确定动力学参数可能会产生偏差值。事实上,在某些条件下,不考虑产物抑制的影响可能会产生如此大的误差,以至于估计的参数可能不值得信任。在这项工作中,使用三个底物耗尽阈值来获得由产物和第二种不同抑制剂抑制的反应的初始速率。动力学参数由Michaelis-Menten速率方程确定,初始速率由理论曲线斜率与时间的乘积得到,由MATLAB模拟(计算机数据)。估计参数的误差,包括第二抑制剂(Kic2和Kiu2)的误差,对每个底物阈值进行量化。正如预期的那样,在没有反应产物抑制的情况下,即当其抑制常数趋于无穷大时,在剩余估计参数中观察到最小的误差。然而,根据产物抑制的大小,估计参数值的百分比误差可超过100%,受参数类型(ki2和ki2偏差最大)和确定初始速率的底物消耗阈值的影响(底物消耗超过1%时偏差更大)。在这项工作中,我们证明,当产物抑制发生时,从初始速率确定的动力学常数通常会受到误差,因此,这不是一个可靠的方法。因此,为了避免确定可能有偏差的动力学参数值,我们建议采用另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
201
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis is a medium for original contributions in the following fields: -kinetics of homogeneous reactions in gas, liquid and solid phase; -Homogeneous catalysis; -Heterogeneous catalysis; -Adsorption in heterogeneous catalysis; -Transport processes related to reaction kinetics and catalysis; -Preparation and study of catalysts; -Reactors and apparatus. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis was formerly published under the title Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书