A tepid confluence of the two seas: India in the Indo-Pacific regional economic architecture

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Peter Brian M. Wang
{"title":"A tepid confluence of the two seas: India in the Indo-Pacific regional economic architecture","authors":"Peter Brian M. Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10308-026-00784-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India’s economic and strategic engagement with the Indo-Pacific has expanded markedly since the launch of the Act East Policy, yet its integration into the region’s economic architecture remains limited and uneven. Drawing on the metaphor of a “confluence of the two seas”, this paper examines why India’s presence across the Indian Ocean and Western Pacific remains tepid despite dense diplomatic activity and multiple institutional affiliations. It traces the distinctive evolution of Asian regionalism, contrasting ASEAN’s and APEC’s soft, consensus-based approach with European models, and assesses how intensifying US–China rivalry, shifting trade architectures (APEC, RCEP, CPTPP, IPEF), and the proliferation of minilateral arrangements constrains India’s room for manoeuvre. The analysis then turns to India’s domestic political economy, highlighting how structural vulnerabilities, protectionist constituencies, and regulatory frictions have produced a pattern of selective and often defensive trade policy that limits India’s role in regional value chains and rule-making processes. The paper argues that recent developments may mark an inflection point. The review of the ASEAN–India FTA (AIFTA) and renewed debate on India’s APEC membership illustrate both the persistence of integration challenges and the possibility of more calibrated liberalisation. Most significantly, the conclusion of a high-standard EU–India Free Trade Agreement in 2026—covering goods, services, investment, government procurement, digital trade, and sustainable development—is analysed as a potential turning point in India’s trade policy, signalling a willingness to accept deeper, rules-heavy commitments under favourable conditions. The EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy and Global Gateway initiative are situated as a “European variable” that reshapes India’s options by offering a non-confrontational, rules-based partner and an inter-regional bridge between European and Indo-Pacific economic architectures. The paper contends that if India leverages this agreement, along with targeted FTA upgrades and minilateral partnerships, as platforms rather than exceptions, it can gradually convert its economic weight and strategic relevance into more credible, embedded regional economic engagement. In doing so, the confluence of the two seas can shift from aspirational metaphor to tangible network of trade, investment, and regulatory linkages in which India plays a genuinely pivotal role.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"687 - 716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-026-00784-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India’s economic and strategic engagement with the Indo-Pacific has expanded markedly since the launch of the Act East Policy, yet its integration into the region’s economic architecture remains limited and uneven. Drawing on the metaphor of a “confluence of the two seas”, this paper examines why India’s presence across the Indian Ocean and Western Pacific remains tepid despite dense diplomatic activity and multiple institutional affiliations. It traces the distinctive evolution of Asian regionalism, contrasting ASEAN’s and APEC’s soft, consensus-based approach with European models, and assesses how intensifying US–China rivalry, shifting trade architectures (APEC, RCEP, CPTPP, IPEF), and the proliferation of minilateral arrangements constrains India’s room for manoeuvre. The analysis then turns to India’s domestic political economy, highlighting how structural vulnerabilities, protectionist constituencies, and regulatory frictions have produced a pattern of selective and often defensive trade policy that limits India’s role in regional value chains and rule-making processes. The paper argues that recent developments may mark an inflection point. The review of the ASEAN–India FTA (AIFTA) and renewed debate on India’s APEC membership illustrate both the persistence of integration challenges and the possibility of more calibrated liberalisation. Most significantly, the conclusion of a high-standard EU–India Free Trade Agreement in 2026—covering goods, services, investment, government procurement, digital trade, and sustainable development—is analysed as a potential turning point in India’s trade policy, signalling a willingness to accept deeper, rules-heavy commitments under favourable conditions. The EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy and Global Gateway initiative are situated as a “European variable” that reshapes India’s options by offering a non-confrontational, rules-based partner and an inter-regional bridge between European and Indo-Pacific economic architectures. The paper contends that if India leverages this agreement, along with targeted FTA upgrades and minilateral partnerships, as platforms rather than exceptions, it can gradually convert its economic weight and strategic relevance into more credible, embedded regional economic engagement. In doing so, the confluence of the two seas can shift from aspirational metaphor to tangible network of trade, investment, and regulatory linkages in which India plays a genuinely pivotal role.

两海的温和交汇:印度在印太区域经济架构中的地位
自“向东行动”政策启动以来,印度与印太地区的经济和战略接触显著扩大,但其融入该地区经济架构的程度仍然有限且不均衡。本文以“两海汇合处”为比喻,探讨了印度在印度洋和西太平洋的存在为何不温不火,尽管其外交活动密集,并加入了多个机构。它追溯了亚洲地区主义的独特演变,将东盟和亚太经合组织的软的、基于共识的方式与欧洲模式进行了对比,并评估了日益加剧的中美竞争、不断变化的贸易架构(亚太经合组织、RCEP、CPTPP、IPEF)以及小边安排的扩散如何限制了印度的回旋余地。然后,分析转向印度国内的政治经济,强调结构脆弱性、保护主义选区和监管摩擦如何产生了一种选择性的、往往是防御性的贸易政策模式,限制了印度在区域价值链和规则制定过程中的作用。文章认为,最近的事态发展可能标志着一个拐点。对东盟-印度自由贸易协定(AIFTA)的审查,以及对印度加入亚太经合组织(APEC)的重新辩论,都表明了一体化挑战的持续存在,以及更精确的自由化的可能性。最重要的是,2026年达成的高标准欧盟-印度自由贸易协定涵盖商品、服务、投资、政府采购、数字贸易和可持续发展,这被分析为印度贸易政策的潜在转折点,表明印度愿意在有利条件下接受更深入、更严格的规则承诺。欧盟的印太战略和全球门户倡议被定位为“欧洲变量”,通过提供一个非对抗性的、基于规则的伙伴,以及欧洲和印太经济架构之间的区域间桥梁,重塑了印度的选择。本文认为,如果印度利用这一协议,以及有针对性的自由贸易协定升级和小范围伙伴关系作为平台而不是例外,它可以逐渐将其经济分量和战略相关性转化为更可信的、嵌入的区域经济参与。这样一来,两海的交汇处就可以从理想的隐喻转变为有形的贸易、投资和监管联系网络,印度在其中发挥着真正的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书