Regional comprehensive economic partnership: opportunities or threats for India?

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Shasha Wu, Yosuke Uchiyama, Elayaraja Aruchunan, Elya Nabila Abdul Bahri, Fumitaka Furuoka
{"title":"Regional comprehensive economic partnership: opportunities or threats for India?","authors":"Shasha Wu,&nbsp;Yosuke Uchiyama,&nbsp;Elayaraja Aruchunan,&nbsp;Elya Nabila Abdul Bahri,&nbsp;Fumitaka Furuoka","doi":"10.1007/s10308-026-00783-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the role of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in advancing regional economic integration between ASEAN and its key dialogue partners, India and China. It explores India’s historical, trade, and investment relations with these actors and highlights the complex dynamics that led to India’s withdrawal from the RCEP. Although this decision is often regarded as a prudent measure to protect domestic industries from competitive pressures, it has also underscored India’s marginalisation within the Asia-Pacific economic landscape and its limited capacity to balance regional influence whilst managing relations with China. Recent geopolitical developments, including adjustments in the multilateral trade environment and the restructuring of global supply chains, have further intensified the complexity of India’s strategic decision-making. In response, the paper develops a three-tier evaluative framework that considers India’s global positioning, regional cooperation networks, and economic resilience in assessing the feasibility of its participation in RCEP. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of trade patterns, investment trends, and relevant institutional developments, the study compares RCEP’s multilateral framework with India’s existing bilateral trade arrangements and examines how these institutional differences shape India’s strategic choices. Finally, the paper provides policy recommendations on whether India should revisit its position and outlines a strategic pathway for India’s engagement in RCEP and the broader role it can play in shaping the future of regional and global trade governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"717 - 753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-026-00783-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in advancing regional economic integration between ASEAN and its key dialogue partners, India and China. It explores India’s historical, trade, and investment relations with these actors and highlights the complex dynamics that led to India’s withdrawal from the RCEP. Although this decision is often regarded as a prudent measure to protect domestic industries from competitive pressures, it has also underscored India’s marginalisation within the Asia-Pacific economic landscape and its limited capacity to balance regional influence whilst managing relations with China. Recent geopolitical developments, including adjustments in the multilateral trade environment and the restructuring of global supply chains, have further intensified the complexity of India’s strategic decision-making. In response, the paper develops a three-tier evaluative framework that considers India’s global positioning, regional cooperation networks, and economic resilience in assessing the feasibility of its participation in RCEP. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of trade patterns, investment trends, and relevant institutional developments, the study compares RCEP’s multilateral framework with India’s existing bilateral trade arrangements and examines how these institutional differences shape India’s strategic choices. Finally, the paper provides policy recommendations on whether India should revisit its position and outlines a strategic pathway for India’s engagement in RCEP and the broader role it can play in shaping the future of regional and global trade governance.

区域全面经济伙伴关系:印度的机遇还是威胁?
本文探讨了区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)在推动东盟及其主要对话伙伴印度和中国之间区域经济一体化方面的作用。它探讨了印度与这些参与者的历史、贸易和投资关系,并强调了导致印度退出RCEP的复杂动态。尽管这一决定通常被视为保护国内产业免受竞争压力的审慎措施,但它也突显了印度在亚太经济格局中的边缘化,以及在处理与中国关系的同时平衡地区影响力的能力有限。最近的地缘政治发展,包括多边贸易环境的调整和全球供应链的重组,进一步加剧了印度战略决策的复杂性。作为回应,本文开发了一个三层评估框架,在评估印度参与RCEP的可行性时,考虑了印度的全球定位、区域合作网络和经济弹性。通过对贸易模式、投资趋势和相关制度发展的定性分析,该研究将RCEP的多边框架与印度现有的双边贸易安排进行了比较,并考察了这些制度差异如何影响印度的战略选择。最后,本文就印度是否应该重新审视其立场提供了政策建议,并概述了印度参与RCEP的战略途径,以及印度在塑造未来区域和全球贸易治理方面可以发挥的更广泛作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书