Trustworthy Governance of Genomic and Health-Related Data: Lessons from Singapore

IF 1.8 Q3 ETHICS
Angela Ballantyne, G. Owen Schaefer, Ainsley J. Newson, Vicki Xafis, Hui Jin Toh, Serene Ong, Tamra Lysaght, E Shyong Tai
{"title":"Trustworthy Governance of Genomic and Health-Related Data: Lessons from Singapore","authors":"Angela Ballantyne,&nbsp;G. Owen Schaefer,&nbsp;Ainsley J. Newson,&nbsp;Vicki Xafis,&nbsp;Hui Jin Toh,&nbsp;Serene Ong,&nbsp;Tamra Lysaght,&nbsp;E Shyong Tai","doi":"10.1007/s41649-025-00397-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Precision medicine (PM) is an approach to research and healthcare delivery driven by insights from linked genomic, epigenetic, clinical, behavioural, and environmental data. Data sharing for PM, especially between parties with divergent strategic and commercial interests, requires balancing competing values, creating a trusted data ecosystem, and maintaining social license. This paper integrates findings from normative bioethics and empirical research in Singapore to discern recommendations for guidance on the ethical governance of genomic and health data. We distil findings from mixed methods research in Singapore and map these onto Kalkman et al.’s themes and principles for data sharing. Based on our normative and empirical analyses, we argue that the values of public benefit, fairness, accountability, and transparency are critical for maintaining social license for PM in Singapore. Consent is important but insufficient to secure public trust or support for data sharing if these other normative values are not achieved. Contrary to assertions in much of the existing bioethics literature on genomic and health data sharing, we found that different consent options (such as specific versus broad consent) had little impact on social license for data sharing. Our analysis provides empirically grounded, contextually appropriate, responsive normative guidance for trustworthy data governance in Singapore. While our findings are specific to Singapore's cultural and institutional context, our methodological approach and the relative de-emphasis of individual consent models offer important insights for other jurisdictions developing PM programs, particularly in non-Western settings where collective values may take precedence over individual autonomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":"18 4","pages":"847 - 868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41649-025-00397-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision medicine (PM) is an approach to research and healthcare delivery driven by insights from linked genomic, epigenetic, clinical, behavioural, and environmental data. Data sharing for PM, especially between parties with divergent strategic and commercial interests, requires balancing competing values, creating a trusted data ecosystem, and maintaining social license. This paper integrates findings from normative bioethics and empirical research in Singapore to discern recommendations for guidance on the ethical governance of genomic and health data. We distil findings from mixed methods research in Singapore and map these onto Kalkman et al.’s themes and principles for data sharing. Based on our normative and empirical analyses, we argue that the values of public benefit, fairness, accountability, and transparency are critical for maintaining social license for PM in Singapore. Consent is important but insufficient to secure public trust or support for data sharing if these other normative values are not achieved. Contrary to assertions in much of the existing bioethics literature on genomic and health data sharing, we found that different consent options (such as specific versus broad consent) had little impact on social license for data sharing. Our analysis provides empirically grounded, contextually appropriate, responsive normative guidance for trustworthy data governance in Singapore. While our findings are specific to Singapore's cultural and institutional context, our methodological approach and the relative de-emphasis of individual consent models offer important insights for other jurisdictions developing PM programs, particularly in non-Western settings where collective values may take precedence over individual autonomy.

基因组和健康相关数据的可信治理:来自新加坡的经验教训
精准医学(PM)是一种由相关基因组、表观遗传学、临床、行为和环境数据的见解驱动的研究和医疗保健服务方法。PM的数据共享,特别是在具有不同战略和商业利益的各方之间,需要平衡竞争价值,创建可信的数据生态系统,并维护社会许可。本文整合了新加坡规范生物伦理学和实证研究的发现,以辨别关于基因组和健康数据伦理治理的指导建议。我们从新加坡的混合方法研究中提炼出结果,并将这些结果映射到Kalkman等人的数据共享主题和原则上。根据我们的规范和实证分析,我们认为公共利益、公平、问责制和透明度的价值观对于维持新加坡总理的社会执照至关重要。同意很重要,但如果没有达到这些其他规范性价值,则不足以确保公众信任或支持数据共享。与许多现有的关于基因组和健康数据共享的生物伦理学文献中的断言相反,我们发现不同的同意选项(如具体同意与广泛同意)对数据共享的社会许可影响不大。我们的分析为新加坡的可信赖数据治理提供了基于经验的、适合上下文的、响应性强的规范性指导。虽然我们的研究结果是针对新加坡的文化和制度背景的,但我们的方法方法和相对不强调个人同意模型,为其他司法管辖区制定PM计划提供了重要的见解,特别是在集体价值观可能优先于个人自治的非西方环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Asian Bioethics Review (ABR) is an international academic journal, based in Asia, providing a forum to express and exchange original ideas on all aspects of bioethics, especially those relevant to the region. Published quarterly, the journal seeks to promote collaborative research among scholars in Asia or with an interest in Asia, as well as multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary bioethical studies more generally. It will appeal to all working on bioethical issues in biomedicine, healthcare, caregiving and patient support, genetics, law and governance, health systems and policy, science studies and research. ABR provides analyses, perspectives and insights into new approaches in bioethics, recent changes in biomedical law and policy, developments in capacity building and professional training, and voices or essays from a student’s perspective. The journal includes articles, research studies, target articles, case evaluations and commentaries. It also publishes book reviews and correspondence to the editor. ABR welcomes original papers from all countries, particularly those that relate to Asia. ABR is the flagship publication of the Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore. The Centre for Biomedical Ethics is a collaborating centre on bioethics of the World Health Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书