L. L. Sales, Edésio M. Barboza Jr., F. C. Carvalho
{"title":"Thermionic emission in nonequilibrium states: an application to carbon nanotubes","authors":"L. L. Sales, Edésio M. Barboza Jr., F. C. Carvalho","doi":"10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-08382-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We test a phenomenological extension of the Richardson–Dushman equation for thermionic emission based on Tsallis’ nonextensive statistics. A temperature-dependent effective entropic index is represented by a polynomial centered on the observed temperature interval, and its parameters are inferred from two datasets for self–Joule–heated individual carbon nanotubes. To avoid comparing a flexible nonlinear model with an artificially restrictive baseline, we analyze seven alternatives: Richardson–Dushman emission with a free effective prefactor, a one-dimensional thermionic law, a free temperature exponent, a temperature-dependent work function, and nonextensive models with constant, linear, and quadratic <i>q</i>(<i>T</i>). Identical broad bounded uniform priors and nested sampling are used for both samples to obtain posterior distributions, Bayesian evidences, and information criteria. For the <span>\\(15\\,\\textrm{V}\\)</span> collection-voltage dataset, the quadratic <i>q</i>(<i>T</i>) model is strongly preferred over the classical alternatives. For the <span>\\(0\\,\\textrm{V}\\)</span> dataset, quadratic <i>q</i>(<i>T</i>) also ranks first, although its evidence and BIC differences relative to the temperature-dependent work function model are inconclusive. Thus, the data support temperature-dependent corrections to ideal thermionic emission, but do not establish a unique nonextensive interpretation across both configurations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":792,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal Plus","volume":"141 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-08382-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal Plus","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-08382-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We test a phenomenological extension of the Richardson–Dushman equation for thermionic emission based on Tsallis’ nonextensive statistics. A temperature-dependent effective entropic index is represented by a polynomial centered on the observed temperature interval, and its parameters are inferred from two datasets for self–Joule–heated individual carbon nanotubes. To avoid comparing a flexible nonlinear model with an artificially restrictive baseline, we analyze seven alternatives: Richardson–Dushman emission with a free effective prefactor, a one-dimensional thermionic law, a free temperature exponent, a temperature-dependent work function, and nonextensive models with constant, linear, and quadratic q(T). Identical broad bounded uniform priors and nested sampling are used for both samples to obtain posterior distributions, Bayesian evidences, and information criteria. For the \(15\,\textrm{V}\) collection-voltage dataset, the quadratic q(T) model is strongly preferred over the classical alternatives. For the \(0\,\textrm{V}\) dataset, quadratic q(T) also ranks first, although its evidence and BIC differences relative to the temperature-dependent work function model are inconclusive. Thus, the data support temperature-dependent corrections to ideal thermionic emission, but do not establish a unique nonextensive interpretation across both configurations.
期刊介绍:
The aims of this peer-reviewed online journal are to distribute and archive all relevant material required to document, assess, validate and reconstruct in detail the body of knowledge in the physical and related sciences.
The scope of EPJ Plus encompasses a broad landscape of fields and disciplines in the physical and related sciences - such as covered by the topical EPJ journals and with the explicit addition of geophysics, astrophysics, general relativity and cosmology, mathematical and quantum physics, classical and fluid mechanics, accelerator and medical physics, as well as physics techniques applied to any other topics, including energy, environment and cultural heritage.