How to Ask the AI: A User Perspective Survey for Large Language Model Prompting

Yiqun Zhang;Yunfan Zhang;Mingjie Zhao;Sen Feng;Yiu-ming Cheung
{"title":"How to Ask the AI: A User Perspective Survey for Large Language Model Prompting","authors":"Yiqun Zhang;Yunfan Zhang;Mingjie Zhao;Sen Feng;Yiu-ming Cheung","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2026.3700136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AI tools such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, powered by large language models (LLMs), allow users to obtain instant and effective content responses simply by typing requests, such as “plan a three-day Vienna trip,” “solve the attached mathematical problem,” “draft an email to inquire review progress,” etc., which are also known as LLM prompts. Crafting clear and well-structured prompts leads to more appropriate LLM feedback, which effectively bridges human-LLM interaction. Although prompting appears accessible to nonexpert users, precisely organizing effective prompts is a highly systematic and skilful process, presenting potential challenges even for experienced users. This survey explores the principles, taxonomy, and organization of prompts from a user-centered perspective. Differing from the existing surveys that primarily focus on technical principles and application scenarios of LLMs, this article provides actionable guidelines for formulating effective LLM prompts across diverse real-world tasks and specifically contributes by: 1) developing an intuitive evaluation strategy for prompt efficacy; 2) providing prompting workflow demonstrations on representative applications; and 3) maintaining a dynamically updated open-source project to ensure the core takeaways remain up-to-date. These measures lower the threshold for users to correctly understand and craft prompts that align with evolving application scenarios.","PeriodicalId":73305,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","volume":"7 10","pages":"5320-5337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11551561","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11551561/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI tools such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, powered by large language models (LLMs), allow users to obtain instant and effective content responses simply by typing requests, such as “plan a three-day Vienna trip,” “solve the attached mathematical problem,” “draft an email to inquire review progress,” etc., which are also known as LLM prompts. Crafting clear and well-structured prompts leads to more appropriate LLM feedback, which effectively bridges human-LLM interaction. Although prompting appears accessible to nonexpert users, precisely organizing effective prompts is a highly systematic and skilful process, presenting potential challenges even for experienced users. This survey explores the principles, taxonomy, and organization of prompts from a user-centered perspective. Differing from the existing surveys that primarily focus on technical principles and application scenarios of LLMs, this article provides actionable guidelines for formulating effective LLM prompts across diverse real-world tasks and specifically contributes by: 1) developing an intuitive evaluation strategy for prompt efficacy; 2) providing prompting workflow demonstrations on representative applications; and 3) maintaining a dynamically updated open-source project to ensure the core takeaways remain up-to-date. These measures lower the threshold for users to correctly understand and craft prompts that align with evolving application scenarios.
如何询问AI:大型语言模型提示的用户视角调查
ChatGPT和DeepSeek等人工智能工具由大型语言模型(LLM)驱动,用户只需输入“计划三天的维也纳之旅”、“解决附带的数学问题”、“起草电子邮件询问审查进度”等请求,就可以获得即时有效的内容回复,这也被称为LLM提示。制作清晰和结构良好的提示会带来更合适的法学硕士反馈,从而有效地连接人与法学硕士的互动。尽管提示对非专业用户来说似乎是可以访问的,但是精确地组织有效的提示是一个高度系统化和熟练的过程,即使对有经验的用户来说也存在潜在的挑战。本调查从以用户为中心的角度探讨了提示的原则、分类和组织。与现有调查主要关注LLM的技术原理和应用场景不同,本文为在不同的现实世界任务中制定有效的LLM提示提供了可操作的指导方针,具体贡献如下:1)制定了提示效果的直观评估策略;2)提供代表性应用的提示工作流演示;3)维护一个动态更新的开源项目,以确保核心内容保持最新。这些措施降低了用户正确理解和制作与不断发展的应用程序场景相一致的提示的门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书