PersoBench: Benchmarking Personalized Response Generation in Large Language Models

Saleh Afzoon;Zahra Jamali;Usman Naseem;Amin Beheshti
{"title":"PersoBench: Benchmarking Personalized Response Generation in Large Language Models","authors":"Saleh Afzoon;Zahra Jamali;Usman Naseem;Amin Beheshti","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2026.3689823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive conversational capabilities, their proficiency in delivering personalized responses remains unclear. Although recent benchmarks automatically evaluate persona consistency in role-playing contexts using LLM-based judgment, the evaluation of personalization in response generation remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present an automated benchmarking pipeline, PersoBench, to evaluate the personalization ability of LLMs in persona-aware dialogue generation within a zero-shot setting. Our framework employs a structured pipeline comprising speaker-aware annotation, task-specific and context-driven prompt construction, response postprocessing, and automated evaluation across multiple dimensions of generation quality. In particular, the pipeline performs text preprocessing and speaker labeling, constructs structured prompts with task instructions and LLM roles, validates response format, and evaluates valid outputs across fluency, personalization, diversity, and coherence. We assess the performance of four open-source and four closed-source LLMs using well-known datasets and a range of explicit metrics. Our findings reveal that while LLMs excel at generating fluent and diverse responses, they are far from satisfactory in delivering personalized and coherent responses, considering both the conversation context and the provided personas.","PeriodicalId":73305,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","volume":"7 10","pages":"5587-5596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11503172/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive conversational capabilities, their proficiency in delivering personalized responses remains unclear. Although recent benchmarks automatically evaluate persona consistency in role-playing contexts using LLM-based judgment, the evaluation of personalization in response generation remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present an automated benchmarking pipeline, PersoBench, to evaluate the personalization ability of LLMs in persona-aware dialogue generation within a zero-shot setting. Our framework employs a structured pipeline comprising speaker-aware annotation, task-specific and context-driven prompt construction, response postprocessing, and automated evaluation across multiple dimensions of generation quality. In particular, the pipeline performs text preprocessing and speaker labeling, constructs structured prompts with task instructions and LLM roles, validates response format, and evaluates valid outputs across fluency, personalization, diversity, and coherence. We assess the performance of four open-source and four closed-source LLMs using well-known datasets and a range of explicit metrics. Our findings reveal that while LLMs excel at generating fluent and diverse responses, they are far from satisfactory in delivering personalized and coherent responses, considering both the conversation context and the provided personas.
personbench:对大型语言模型中的个性化响应生成进行基准测试
虽然大型语言模型(llm)展示了令人印象深刻的会话能力,但它们在提供个性化响应方面的熟练程度仍不清楚。尽管最近的基准测试使用基于法学硕士的判断自动评估角色扮演环境中的角色一致性,但对响应生成中的个性化评估仍未得到充分探索。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了一个自动化的基准测试管道,personbench,以评估法学硕士在零镜头设置下在人物感知对话生成中的个性化能力。我们的框架采用结构化的管道,包括讲话者感知的注释、特定于任务和上下文驱动的提示构建、响应后处理以及跨多个维度的生成质量自动评估。特别是,该管道执行文本预处理和说话人标签,构建带有任务指令和LLM角色的结构化提示,验证响应格式,并评估流畅性、个性化、多样性和连贯性方面的有效输出。我们使用知名的数据集和一系列明确的指标来评估四个开源和四个闭源法学硕士的性能。我们的研究结果表明,虽然法学硕士擅长产生流利和多样化的回答,但考虑到对话上下文和所提供的人物角色,他们在提供个性化和连贯的回答方面远不能令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书