Managing Public Opinions Based on the Self-Confidence-Driven Hegselmann–Krause Model

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Xia Chen;Mengting Gao;Guoyin Jiang;Qirui Li;Xuejing Yang;Yangjingjing Zhang
{"title":"Managing Public Opinions Based on the Self-Confidence-Driven Hegselmann–Krause Model","authors":"Xia Chen;Mengting Gao;Guoyin Jiang;Qirui Li;Xuejing Yang;Yangjingjing Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TCSS.2025.3630055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public opinion management plays a vital role in both government governance and corporate competition. Opinion dynamics provides a key framework for its study, with the classic Hegselmann–Krause (HK) model using confidence thresholds to define individuals’ opinion exploration and interaction ranges. However, many existing studies treat these thresholds as exogenous, overlooking the influence of internal psychological traits—particularly self-confidence—on external exploratory behavior. To bridge this gap, we propose a self-confidence-driven HK (SCD-HK) model by establishing a driving relationship between individuals’ internal self-confidence levels and their external confidence thresholds. Based on this, we develop an optimal intervention model under time constraints to guide public opinion evolution. Numerical analyses, including sensitivity tests, comparative experiments, and a case study, reveal that: 1) moderate self-confidence levels better promote consensus than extreme values; 2) a concave relationship between self-confidence and confidence thresholds better facilitates consensus; and 3) our SCD-HK model outperforms traditional models in consensus ratio, convergence speed, and intervention cost. This article highlights the importance of incorporating the relationship between individuals’ inherent self-confidence levels and external confidence thresholds in opinion evolution, and our findings offer practical insights for more effective opinion management.","PeriodicalId":13044,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","volume":"13 5","pages":"6532-6546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11269108/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public opinion management plays a vital role in both government governance and corporate competition. Opinion dynamics provides a key framework for its study, with the classic Hegselmann–Krause (HK) model using confidence thresholds to define individuals’ opinion exploration and interaction ranges. However, many existing studies treat these thresholds as exogenous, overlooking the influence of internal psychological traits—particularly self-confidence—on external exploratory behavior. To bridge this gap, we propose a self-confidence-driven HK (SCD-HK) model by establishing a driving relationship between individuals’ internal self-confidence levels and their external confidence thresholds. Based on this, we develop an optimal intervention model under time constraints to guide public opinion evolution. Numerical analyses, including sensitivity tests, comparative experiments, and a case study, reveal that: 1) moderate self-confidence levels better promote consensus than extreme values; 2) a concave relationship between self-confidence and confidence thresholds better facilitates consensus; and 3) our SCD-HK model outperforms traditional models in consensus ratio, convergence speed, and intervention cost. This article highlights the importance of incorporating the relationship between individuals’ inherent self-confidence levels and external confidence thresholds in opinion evolution, and our findings offer practical insights for more effective opinion management.
基于自信驱动Hegselmann-Krause模型的民意管理
舆论管理在政府治理和企业竞争中都起着至关重要的作用。意见动力学为其研究提供了一个关键框架,经典的Hegselmann-Krause (HK)模型使用置信阈值来定义个体的意见探索和互动范围。然而,许多现有的研究将这些阈值视为外源性的,忽视了内部心理特征——尤其是自信对外部探索行为的影响。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了一个自我自信驱动的香港(SCD-HK)模型,通过建立个人内部自信水平和外部自信阈值之间的驱动关系。在此基础上,我们构建了一个时间约束下的最优干预模型来引导民意演变。包括敏感性测试、比较实验和案例分析在内的数值分析表明:1)适度的自信水平比极端的自信水平更能促进共识;2)自信与置信阈值呈凹形关系,更有利于达成共识;3) SCD-HK模型在共识比、收敛速度和干预成本方面优于传统模型。本文强调了在意见演变中纳入个人内在自信水平和外部信心阈值之间关系的重要性,我们的研究结果为更有效的意见管理提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems focuses on such topics as modeling, simulation, analysis and understanding of social systems from the quantitative and/or computational perspective. "Systems" include man-man, man-machine and machine-machine organizations and adversarial situations as well as social media structures and their dynamics. More specifically, the proposed transactions publishes articles on modeling the dynamics of social systems, methodologies for incorporating and representing socio-cultural and behavioral aspects in computational modeling, analysis of social system behavior and structure, and paradigms for social systems modeling and simulation. The journal also features articles on social network dynamics, social intelligence and cognition, social systems design and architectures, socio-cultural modeling and representation, and computational behavior modeling, and their applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书