oAssessment of Different Proximity Metrics in Clustering of Geometric Features: An Optimal Stock Design for Hybrid Manufacturing CAPP

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.034
E. Matengele, H. Osman, A. Azab, F. Baki
{"title":"oAssessment of Different Proximity Metrics in Clustering of Geometric Features: An Optimal Stock Design for Hybrid Manufacturing CAPP","authors":"E. Matengele,&nbsp;H. Osman,&nbsp;A. Azab,&nbsp;F. Baki","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stock design is a critical yet underexplored factor in Hybrid Manufacturing (HM) process planning, directly influencing material efficiency and production cycle time. This study extends a constrained clustering framework for HM stock design by systematically evaluating how the choice of proximity metric influences cluster formation and downstream manufacturing performance. Four distance measures, Hausdorff, Modified Hausdorff, Chamfer, and Sum of Minimum Distances, were incorporated into a clustering optimization model and evaluated across multiple cluster counts on two industrially representative prismatic components: a 22-feature part (15 additive, 7 subtractive) and a 15-feature clip-holder (7 additive, 8 subtractive). Cluster similarity, quantified via the Adjusted Rand Index and validated through a blocked two-way ANOVA with replication across three aspect-ratio variants, revealed strong consensus at low cluster counts but increasing divergence as partitioning granularity grew, indicating that metric selection becomes critical at higher partitioning levels. The resulting configurations were integrated into an extended HM Computer-Aided Process Planning model to assess manufacturing cycle time. For the 22-feature part, the Sum of Minimum Distances achieved a 9.1% cycle time reduction relative to the Hausdorff baseline. For the clip-holder, multiple metrics converged to the same minimum cycle time, indicating that metric sensitivity is part-dependent. These findings provide a structured methodology for proximity metric selection in HM stock design and demonstrate its tangible impact on manufacturing efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 247-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stock design is a critical yet underexplored factor in Hybrid Manufacturing (HM) process planning, directly influencing material efficiency and production cycle time. This study extends a constrained clustering framework for HM stock design by systematically evaluating how the choice of proximity metric influences cluster formation and downstream manufacturing performance. Four distance measures, Hausdorff, Modified Hausdorff, Chamfer, and Sum of Minimum Distances, were incorporated into a clustering optimization model and evaluated across multiple cluster counts on two industrially representative prismatic components: a 22-feature part (15 additive, 7 subtractive) and a 15-feature clip-holder (7 additive, 8 subtractive). Cluster similarity, quantified via the Adjusted Rand Index and validated through a blocked two-way ANOVA with replication across three aspect-ratio variants, revealed strong consensus at low cluster counts but increasing divergence as partitioning granularity grew, indicating that metric selection becomes critical at higher partitioning levels. The resulting configurations were integrated into an extended HM Computer-Aided Process Planning model to assess manufacturing cycle time. For the 22-feature part, the Sum of Minimum Distances achieved a 9.1% cycle time reduction relative to the Hausdorff baseline. For the clip-holder, multiple metrics converged to the same minimum cycle time, indicating that metric sensitivity is part-dependent. These findings provide a structured methodology for proximity metric selection in HM stock design and demonstrate its tangible impact on manufacturing efficiency.
几何特征聚类中不同接近度度量的评估:混合制造CAPP的最优库存设计
在混合制造(HM)工艺规划中,库存设计是一个关键但尚未得到充分开发的因素,它直接影响材料效率和生产周期时间。本研究通过系统地评估邻近度量的选择如何影响集群形成和下游制造绩效,扩展了HM库存设计的约束聚类框架。四种距离度量,Hausdorff, Modified Hausdorff, Chamfer和Sum of Minimum distance,被纳入聚类优化模型,并在两个具有工业代表性的柱形组件上进行多个聚类计数评估:一个22个特征的部件(15个加法,7个减法)和一个15个特征的夹架(7个加法,8个减法)。通过调整后的兰德指数(Adjusted Rand Index)量化聚类相似性,并通过三种宽高比变量复制的阻断双向方差分析(blocked -双向ANOVA)进行验证,结果显示,在低聚类数量时,聚类相似性具有很强的一致性,但随着分区粒度的增加,分歧也会增加,这表明在更高的分区水平上,度量选择变得至关重要。结果配置被集成到扩展的HM计算机辅助工艺规划模型中,以评估制造周期时间。对于22个特征部分,相对于Hausdorff基线,最小距离之和实现了9.1%的周期时间缩短。对于夹夹器,多个度量收敛到相同的最小周期时间,表明度量灵敏度是部分依赖的。这些发现为HM库存设计中的接近度量选择提供了一种结构化的方法,并证明了其对制造效率的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书