Experimental validation of melt pool temperature and height prediction model for robotic welding

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.047
Ahmed Khalil, Reza Tafreshi, Prabhakar R. Pagilla
{"title":"Experimental validation of melt pool temperature and height prediction model for robotic welding","authors":"Ahmed Khalil,&nbsp;Reza Tafreshi,&nbsp;Prabhakar R. Pagilla","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a control-oriented model to predict fillet melt-pool temperature and bead height in robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) and experimentally validates model’s predictions. The model is derived from first principles through coupled mass- and energy-balance equations that describe the evolution of molten-pool height and temperature using a lumped-parameter formulation suitable for real-time control. Model coefficients describing geometric behavior are calibrated from post-weld measurements of steady-state bead height trends. The model was experimentally validated on a UR10e collaborative robot executing straight fillet welds using two wire diameters (0.889 mm and 1.5875 mm) across voltages of 20-34 V and travel speeds of 8-25 mm/s. A short-wavelength infrared camera captures the in-situ thermal fields while post-weld photographs provide ground-truth geometry for validation. An image-processing pipeline converts the thermal frames into per-frame height estimates that track post-weld profiles with frame-wise deviations of approximately 3.5–10%. The model predicts that temperature increases with voltage and reinforcement decreases with travel speed, matching experimental trends with low error. For pool temperature, the mean absolute and root mean squared errors are 21.7/26.1 <span><math><mrow><mi>°</mi></mrow></math></span>C for the 0.889 mm wire and 13.4/16.3 <span><math><mrow><mi>°</mi></mrow></math></span>C for the 1.5875 mm wire. For bead height, the corresponding errors are 0.375/0.477 mm and 0.527/0.667 mm.</div><div>These results confirm that the physics-based model captures the coupled thermal and geometric behavior of fillet welding with accuracy suitable for model-based estimation and control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326000982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops a control-oriented model to predict fillet melt-pool temperature and bead height in robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) and experimentally validates model’s predictions. The model is derived from first principles through coupled mass- and energy-balance equations that describe the evolution of molten-pool height and temperature using a lumped-parameter formulation suitable for real-time control. Model coefficients describing geometric behavior are calibrated from post-weld measurements of steady-state bead height trends. The model was experimentally validated on a UR10e collaborative robot executing straight fillet welds using two wire diameters (0.889 mm and 1.5875 mm) across voltages of 20-34 V and travel speeds of 8-25 mm/s. A short-wavelength infrared camera captures the in-situ thermal fields while post-weld photographs provide ground-truth geometry for validation. An image-processing pipeline converts the thermal frames into per-frame height estimates that track post-weld profiles with frame-wise deviations of approximately 3.5–10%. The model predicts that temperature increases with voltage and reinforcement decreases with travel speed, matching experimental trends with low error. For pool temperature, the mean absolute and root mean squared errors are 21.7/26.1 °C for the 0.889 mm wire and 13.4/16.3 °C for the 1.5875 mm wire. For bead height, the corresponding errors are 0.375/0.477 mm and 0.527/0.667 mm.
These results confirm that the physics-based model captures the coupled thermal and geometric behavior of fillet welding with accuracy suitable for model-based estimation and control.
机器人焊接熔池温度和高度预测模型的实验验证
本文建立了一个面向控制的机器人气体金属弧焊(GMAW)圆角熔池温度和焊头高度预测模型,并对模型的预测结果进行了实验验证。该模型是根据第一性原理通过耦合的质量和能量平衡方程推导出来的,该方程使用适合实时控制的集总参数公式描述了熔池高度和温度的演变。描述几何行为的模型系数是从稳态头高度趋势的焊接后测量中校准的。该模型在UR10e协作机器人上进行了实验验证,该机器人使用两种直径(0.889 mm和1.5875 mm)的导线,在20-34 V的电压下,在8-25 mm/s的速度下进行直角焊。短波长红外摄像机捕获现场热场,而焊后照片提供了验证的地面真实几何形状。图像处理管道将热帧转换为每帧高度估计,跟踪焊接后的轮廓,帧之间的偏差约为3.5-10%。该模型预测温度随电压升高而升高,钢筋随行进速度降低,符合实验趋势,误差小。对于池温,0.889 mm线的平均绝对误差和均方根误差为21.7/26.1°C, 1.5875 mm线的平均绝对误差为13.4/16.3°C。对于焊头高度,误差分别为0.375/0.477 mm和0.527/0.667 mm。结果表明,基于物理的模型能够准确地捕捉到角焊缝的热学和几何耦合行为,能够满足基于模型的估计和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书