Improving bending force prediction in L-die bending process

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.056
Saowalak Kongiang, Masahiko Jin, Sutasn Thipprakmas
{"title":"Improving bending force prediction in L-die bending process","authors":"Saowalak Kongiang,&nbsp;Masahiko Jin,&nbsp;Sutasn Thipprakmas","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing production costs in sheet-metal forming is often accomplished by carefully matching the press machine capacity to the required forming force. Consequently, press machine capacity can be selected more appropriately when the forming force is predicted more accurately. Existing formulas for L-die bending force calculation demonstrate limited accuracy in predicting the actual force required during the bending process. In this research, the calculation of the L-die bending force was revised based on the L-die bending mechanism, using both the finite element method (FEM) and experimental analysis. Because the bending mechanisms differ between a 90° die angle and a die angle greater than 90°, the L-die bending force prediction required specific modifications for each case. Accordingly, this research proposes two improved bending force prediction models for the L-die bending process under two specific conditions: a die angle of 90° and a die angle greater than 90°. By comparison with the experimental data, the accuracy of the improved L-die bending force predictions was re-evaluated. The results were also compared with the L-die bending force calculation methods currently in use. When comparing the bending forces obtained from experimental work with those predicted by the existing L-die bending force formulas, significant inaccuracies were observed—exceeding 40% for a 90° die angle and 80% for a die angle greater than 90°. However, when comparing the improved L-die bending force predictions proposed in this research with the experimental results, the prediction error was reduced to less than approximately 1%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 453-464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326001070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing production costs in sheet-metal forming is often accomplished by carefully matching the press machine capacity to the required forming force. Consequently, press machine capacity can be selected more appropriately when the forming force is predicted more accurately. Existing formulas for L-die bending force calculation demonstrate limited accuracy in predicting the actual force required during the bending process. In this research, the calculation of the L-die bending force was revised based on the L-die bending mechanism, using both the finite element method (FEM) and experimental analysis. Because the bending mechanisms differ between a 90° die angle and a die angle greater than 90°, the L-die bending force prediction required specific modifications for each case. Accordingly, this research proposes two improved bending force prediction models for the L-die bending process under two specific conditions: a die angle of 90° and a die angle greater than 90°. By comparison with the experimental data, the accuracy of the improved L-die bending force predictions was re-evaluated. The results were also compared with the L-die bending force calculation methods currently in use. When comparing the bending forces obtained from experimental work with those predicted by the existing L-die bending force formulas, significant inaccuracies were observed—exceeding 40% for a 90° die angle and 80% for a die angle greater than 90°. However, when comparing the improved L-die bending force predictions proposed in this research with the experimental results, the prediction error was reduced to less than approximately 1%.
改进l型模弯曲过程中的弯曲力预测
降低钣金成形的生产成本通常是通过仔细匹配压力机容量和所需的成形力来实现的。因此,当成形力预测更准确时,压力机容量的选择就更合适。现有的l型模具弯曲力计算公式在预测弯曲过程中所需的实际力方面精度有限。基于l型模弯曲机理,采用有限元法和实验分析相结合的方法对l型模弯曲力的计算方法进行了修正。由于90°模角和大于90°模角之间的弯曲机制不同,因此l型模弯曲力预测需要针对每种情况进行具体修改。据此,本研究提出了两种改进的l型模弯曲过程的弯曲力预测模型:模角为90°和模角大于90°。通过与实验数据的比较,重新评价了改进后的l型模弯曲力预测的准确性。并将计算结果与目前常用的l型模弯曲力计算方法进行了比较。当将实验所得的弯曲力与现有l型模具弯曲力公式预测的弯曲力进行比较时,观察到明显的不准确性-对于90°模具角度超过40%,对于大于90°的模具角度超过80%。然而,当将本研究提出的改进的l模弯曲力预测与实验结果进行比较时,预测误差减小到约1%以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书