Surface Roughness and Edge Roundness in Robotic-Assisted Abrasive Finishing of Metal Additive Manufactured Al-Si10-Mg Alloy

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.075
Ahmed Asif Razin, Brigid Mullany, Jose Outeiro
{"title":"Surface Roughness and Edge Roundness in Robotic-Assisted Abrasive Finishing of Metal Additive Manufactured Al-Si10-Mg Alloy","authors":"Ahmed Asif Razin,&nbsp;Brigid Mullany,&nbsp;Jose Outeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) components often exhibit poor as-built surface integrity, characterized by high roughness, surface defects, and tensile residual stresses, which can significantly affect their functional performance and lifespan. This study investigates the influence of a Robot-Assisted Abrasive Finishing (RAF) system on the surface roughness and edge roundness of Al-10Si-Mg parts fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). The RAF system is based on the tribofinishing and enables the adaptive control of key process parameters, including abrasive media material and geometry, relative motion between the part and the media, and metalworking fluid. Surface roughness parameters (Sa, Sz, Sq) were measured using 3D Coherent Scanning Interferometry, which also allowed monitoring of edge radius evolution during polishing to assess the system’s capability to preserve geometrical features. Although parts finished using the hybrid mode that combines drag and vibratory finishing kinematics exhibit surface asperities and processing times comparable to those obtained with drag finishing alone, this approach produces sharper workpiece edges than drag finishing by itself. In contrast, vibratory finishing requires a longer processing time than both drag finishing and the hybrid process, but it is more effective in preserving edge roundness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 633-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326001264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) components often exhibit poor as-built surface integrity, characterized by high roughness, surface defects, and tensile residual stresses, which can significantly affect their functional performance and lifespan. This study investigates the influence of a Robot-Assisted Abrasive Finishing (RAF) system on the surface roughness and edge roundness of Al-10Si-Mg parts fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). The RAF system is based on the tribofinishing and enables the adaptive control of key process parameters, including abrasive media material and geometry, relative motion between the part and the media, and metalworking fluid. Surface roughness parameters (Sa, Sz, Sq) were measured using 3D Coherent Scanning Interferometry, which also allowed monitoring of edge radius evolution during polishing to assess the system’s capability to preserve geometrical features. Although parts finished using the hybrid mode that combines drag and vibratory finishing kinematics exhibit surface asperities and processing times comparable to those obtained with drag finishing alone, this approach produces sharper workpiece edges than drag finishing by itself. In contrast, vibratory finishing requires a longer processing time than both drag finishing and the hybrid process, but it is more effective in preserving edge roundness.
机械辅助磨料精加工Al-Si10-Mg合金的表面粗糙度和边缘圆度
金属增材制造(AM)组件通常表现出较差的成品表面完整性,其特点是高粗糙度、表面缺陷和拉伸残余应力,这可能会显著影响其功能性能和寿命。研究了机器人辅助磨料精加工(RAF)系统对激光粉末床熔合(LPBF) Al-10Si-Mg零件表面粗糙度和边缘圆度的影响。RAF系统基于摩擦精加工,能够自适应控制关键工艺参数,包括磨料介质材料和几何形状、零件与介质之间的相对运动以及金属加工流体。表面粗糙度参数(Sa, Sz, Sq)使用3D相干扫描干涉测量法测量,该方法还可以监测抛光过程中的边缘半径演变,以评估系统保持几何特征的能力。尽管使用混合模式完成的零件结合了拖动和振动精加工运动学,与单独拖动精加工获得的表面粗糙度和加工时间相当,但这种方法产生的工件边缘比单独拖动精加工产生的工件边缘更锋利。相比之下,振动精加工比拖动精加工和混合精加工需要更长的加工时间,但在保持边缘圆度方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书