Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Scoping Review of Current Literature

IF 2.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
CJC Open Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2026.06.007
Adham H. Elsherbini BHSc, Ibrahim Ahmed Cherif BHSc, Alisha Ahmed BHSc, Ali Haider BHSc, Ahmad Alaraki MBBS, Mohamed R. Gemae MD, BSc, Farzan Ansari MD, BSc, Ahmed A. Harby MSc, Vipin Chaudhary PhD, Yasir Abu-Omar MD, PhD, Mohammad El-Diasty MD, PhD
{"title":"Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Scoping Review of Current Literature","authors":"Adham H. Elsherbini BHSc,&nbsp;Ibrahim Ahmed Cherif BHSc,&nbsp;Alisha Ahmed BHSc,&nbsp;Ali Haider BHSc,&nbsp;Ahmad Alaraki MBBS,&nbsp;Mohamed R. Gemae MD, BSc,&nbsp;Farzan Ansari MD, BSc,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Harby MSc,&nbsp;Vipin Chaudhary PhD,&nbsp;Yasir Abu-Omar MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mohammad El-Diasty MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2026.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping review aims to consolidate the current evidence on the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, were searched for studies assessing the use of ML models for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. A total of 1076 citations were screened, of which 21 studies underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 11 studies comprising 101,030 patients were included for data extraction. Study sample sizes ranged from 178 to 54,739 patients, with reported mortality intervals ranging from 30 days to 5 years after surgery. The parameters that were included in these ML models included demographic and clinical variables, electrocardiographic findings, laboratory results, computed tomography scans, and the type and size of the selected TAVR device. A total of 13 ML models were assessed across the included studies. Random Forest appeared to be the highest performing ML model in predicting 30-day and 1-year survival following TAVR, with reported area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores ranging from 0.66 to 0.97. In addition, the gradient-boosted machine seemed to outperform the CoreValve and TAVI2-SCORE in predicting 1-year survival. ML models may allow for accurate prediction of mortality following TAVR and may offer advantages over traditional clinical risk scores. However, limited datasets and variability in algorithm metric scores remain the main limitations to the implementation of these models in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"Pages 1375-1385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X26002556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review aims to consolidate the current evidence on the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched for studies assessing the use of ML models for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. A total of 1076 citations were screened, of which 21 studies underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 11 studies comprising 101,030 patients were included for data extraction. Study sample sizes ranged from 178 to 54,739 patients, with reported mortality intervals ranging from 30 days to 5 years after surgery. The parameters that were included in these ML models included demographic and clinical variables, electrocardiographic findings, laboratory results, computed tomography scans, and the type and size of the selected TAVR device. A total of 13 ML models were assessed across the included studies. Random Forest appeared to be the highest performing ML model in predicting 30-day and 1-year survival following TAVR, with reported area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores ranging from 0.66 to 0.97. In addition, the gradient-boosted machine seemed to outperform the CoreValve and TAVI2-SCORE in predicting 1-year survival. ML models may allow for accurate prediction of mortality following TAVR and may offer advantages over traditional clinical risk scores. However, limited datasets and variability in algorithm metric scores remain the main limitations to the implementation of these models in clinical practice.
机器学习预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率:当前文献综述
本综述旨在巩固目前使用机器学习(ML)算法预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)手术后死亡率的证据。本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行。包括Medline、Embase、Cochrane和ClinicalTrials.gov在内的电子数据库被检索,以评估使用ML模型预测TAVR患者死亡率的研究。共筛选了1076篇引文,其中21篇研究进行了全文综述。最终,纳入了11项研究,包括101,030名患者进行数据提取。研究样本量从178例到54,739例不等,报告的死亡率间隔从手术后30天到5年不等。这些ML模型中包含的参数包括人口统计学和临床变量、心电图结果、实验室结果、计算机断层扫描以及所选TAVR装置的类型和大小。在纳入的研究中,总共评估了13个ML模型。在预测TAVR术后30天和1年生存率方面,随机森林似乎是表现最好的ML模型,报告的受试者工作特征下面积(AUROC)评分范围为0.66至0.97。此外,梯度增强机在预测1年生存率方面似乎优于CoreValve和TAVI2-SCORE。ML模型可以准确预测TAVR后的死亡率,并且可能比传统的临床风险评分更具优势。然而,有限的数据集和算法度量分数的可变性仍然是这些模型在临床实践中实施的主要限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书