A Multimodal Manufacturing Safety Chatbot: Knowledge Base Design, Benchmark Development, and Evaluation of Multiple RAG Approaches

IF 2.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.012
Ryan Singh, Austin Hamilton, Amanda White, Michael Wise, Ibrahim Yousif, Arthur Carvalho, Zhe Shan, Reza Abrisham Baf, Mohammad Mayyas, Lora A. Cavuoto, Fadel M. Megahed
{"title":"A Multimodal Manufacturing Safety Chatbot: Knowledge Base Design, Benchmark Development, and Evaluation of Multiple RAG Approaches","authors":"Ryan Singh,&nbsp;Austin Hamilton,&nbsp;Amanda White,&nbsp;Michael Wise,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yousif,&nbsp;Arthur Carvalho,&nbsp;Zhe Shan,&nbsp;Reza Abrisham Baf,&nbsp;Mohammad Mayyas,&nbsp;Lora A. Cavuoto,&nbsp;Fadel M. Megahed","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensuring worker safety remains a critical challenge in modern manufacturing environments. Industry 5.0 reorients the prevailing manufacturing paradigm toward more human-centric operations. Using a design science research methodology, we identify three essential requirements for next-generation safety training systems: high accuracy, low latency, and low cost. We introduce a multimodal chatbot powered by large language models that meets these design requirements. The chatbot uses retrieval-augmented generation to ground its responses in curated regulatory and technical documentation. To evaluate our solution, we developed a domain-specific benchmark of expert-validated question and answer pairs for three representative machines: a Bridgeport manual mill, a Haas TL-1 CNC lathe, and a Universal Robots UR5e collaborative robot. We tested 24 RAG configurations using a full-factorial design and assessed them with automated evaluations of correctness, latency, and cost. Our top 2 configurations were then evaluated by ten industry experts and academic researchers. Our results show that retrieval strategy and model configuration have a significant impact on performance. The top configuration, selected for chatbot deployment, achieved an accuracy of 86.66%, an average cost of $0.005 per query, and an average end-to-end latency of 10.04 seconds. This latency is practical for delivering a complete safety instruction and is measured from query submission to full instruction delivery rather than generation onset. Overall, our work provides three contributions: an open-source, domain-grounded safety training chatbot; a validated benchmark for evaluating AI-assisted safety instruction; and a systematic methodology for designing and assessing AI-enabled instructional and immersive safety training systems for Industry 5.0 environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 30-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring worker safety remains a critical challenge in modern manufacturing environments. Industry 5.0 reorients the prevailing manufacturing paradigm toward more human-centric operations. Using a design science research methodology, we identify three essential requirements for next-generation safety training systems: high accuracy, low latency, and low cost. We introduce a multimodal chatbot powered by large language models that meets these design requirements. The chatbot uses retrieval-augmented generation to ground its responses in curated regulatory and technical documentation. To evaluate our solution, we developed a domain-specific benchmark of expert-validated question and answer pairs for three representative machines: a Bridgeport manual mill, a Haas TL-1 CNC lathe, and a Universal Robots UR5e collaborative robot. We tested 24 RAG configurations using a full-factorial design and assessed them with automated evaluations of correctness, latency, and cost. Our top 2 configurations were then evaluated by ten industry experts and academic researchers. Our results show that retrieval strategy and model configuration have a significant impact on performance. The top configuration, selected for chatbot deployment, achieved an accuracy of 86.66%, an average cost of $0.005 per query, and an average end-to-end latency of 10.04 seconds. This latency is practical for delivering a complete safety instruction and is measured from query submission to full instruction delivery rather than generation onset. Overall, our work provides three contributions: an open-source, domain-grounded safety training chatbot; a validated benchmark for evaluating AI-assisted safety instruction; and a systematic methodology for designing and assessing AI-enabled instructional and immersive safety training systems for Industry 5.0 environments.
多模态制造安全聊天机器人:知识库设计、基准开发和多种RAG方法的评估
在现代制造业环境中,确保工人安全仍然是一项重大挑战。工业5.0将主流的制造模式重新定位为更加以人为中心的操作。采用设计科学研究方法,我们确定了下一代安全培训系统的三个基本要求:高精度、低延迟和低成本。我们介绍了一个由满足这些设计要求的大型语言模型驱动的多模态聊天机器人。聊天机器人使用检索增强生成来根据精心策划的法规和技术文档进行响应。为了评估我们的解决方案,我们为三个代表性机器开发了一个特定领域的专家验证问题和答案对基准:Bridgeport手工铣床、Haas TL-1数控车床和Universal Robots UR5e协作机器人。我们使用全因子设计测试了24种RAG配置,并对它们进行了正确性、延迟和成本的自动评估。然后由10位行业专家和学术研究人员对我们的前2个配置进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,检索策略和模型配置对性能有显著影响。为聊天机器人部署选择的顶级配置实现了86.66%的准确率,每个查询的平均成本为0.005美元,平均端到端延迟为10.04秒。此延迟对于交付完整的安全指令是实用的,并且从查询提交到完整指令交付(而不是生成开始)进行测量。总的来说,我们的工作提供了三个贡献:一个开源的、基于领域的安全训练聊天机器人;评估人工智能辅助安全指导的有效基准;以及为工业5.0环境设计和评估支持人工智能的教学和沉浸式安全培训系统的系统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书