{"title":"Big Data Analytics for RFID-enabled Manufacturing: A Case Study on Production Efficiency and Quality Optimization","authors":"Qiaohao Hu, Ray Y. Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2026.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive big data analytics approach for processing and analyzing radio frequency identification (RFID) data in a smart manufacturing environment. Using a dataset containing 413,472 records of manufacturing operations, we extract actionable insights to improve production efficiency and product quality. Our methodology includes data preprocessing, cluster analysis, multi-dimensional worker efficiency evaluation, and machine learning-based quality prediction. The results reveal distinct clusters of manufacturing processes with varying levels of complexity, significant correlations between process sequences and equipment utilization, and a robust framework for identifying high-performing workers. Furthermore, our machine learning quality prediction system achieves an accuracy of 86.4%. These findings offer manufacturers data-driven strategies for optimizing worker assignments, process sequencing, and quality control in RFID-enabled environments. The results reveal five distinct processing clusters with varying complexity levels and quality characteristics. Comprehensive temporal analysis uncovered significant shift-based quality differences (ANOVA: F=8.55, p<0.001), with Night Shift achieving the highest quality (99.29%) and Day Shift the lowest (99.16%). A systematic weekly quality decline trend was identified (slope=-0.000833/week, R<sup>2</sup>=0.824, p<0.001), suggesting equipment degradation or material variation factors. Hourly analysis revealed peak quality at 05:00 (99.58%) and lowest at 07:00 (98.92%), corresponding to shift transition periods. Within-shift fatigue analysis showed minimal degradation, with only Night Shift exhibiting a slight decline (-0.15%).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846326000659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive big data analytics approach for processing and analyzing radio frequency identification (RFID) data in a smart manufacturing environment. Using a dataset containing 413,472 records of manufacturing operations, we extract actionable insights to improve production efficiency and product quality. Our methodology includes data preprocessing, cluster analysis, multi-dimensional worker efficiency evaluation, and machine learning-based quality prediction. The results reveal distinct clusters of manufacturing processes with varying levels of complexity, significant correlations between process sequences and equipment utilization, and a robust framework for identifying high-performing workers. Furthermore, our machine learning quality prediction system achieves an accuracy of 86.4%. These findings offer manufacturers data-driven strategies for optimizing worker assignments, process sequencing, and quality control in RFID-enabled environments. The results reveal five distinct processing clusters with varying complexity levels and quality characteristics. Comprehensive temporal analysis uncovered significant shift-based quality differences (ANOVA: F=8.55, p<0.001), with Night Shift achieving the highest quality (99.29%) and Day Shift the lowest (99.16%). A systematic weekly quality decline trend was identified (slope=-0.000833/week, R2=0.824, p<0.001), suggesting equipment degradation or material variation factors. Hourly analysis revealed peak quality at 05:00 (99.58%) and lowest at 07:00 (98.92%), corresponding to shift transition periods. Within-shift fatigue analysis showed minimal degradation, with only Night Shift exhibiting a slight decline (-0.15%).