Resilience simulation and optimization of China's crude oil supply chain under geopolitical disruptions

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Petroleum Science Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.petsci.2026.07.062
Jing-Ye Liu, Shuang-Shuang Long, Feng-Qi Guo, Huan-Huan He, Ri-Jia Ding
{"title":"Resilience simulation and optimization of China's crude oil supply chain under geopolitical disruptions","authors":"Jing-Ye Liu,&nbsp;Shuang-Shuang Long,&nbsp;Feng-Qi Guo,&nbsp;Huan-Huan He,&nbsp;Ri-Jia Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.petsci.2026.07.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recurring geopolitical disruptions have intensified uncertainty in international energy supply chains, making supply chain resilience a critical dimension of energy security. Although China is a major crude oil importer, the resilience of its crude oil supply chain (COSC) has received limited attention. This study employs a coupled system dynamics and input-output model to simulate COSC resilience under geopolitical disruptions and identifies priority emergency response strategies for the gasoline, diesel, and kerosene supply chains by evaluating the recovery capacity and cost-effectiveness of alternative emergency measure combinations. Results show that releasing 10% of the strategic petroleum reserve and 10% of refined oil inventories provides a baseline response but cannot fully offset severe import disruptions. Under the Middle East conflict scenario, which causes a 47% crude oil import shortfall lasting 180 days, upstream measures are generally more cost-effective than downstream ones. Full recovery requires upstream measures plus gasoline export reduction and consumption compression for gasoline, upstream measures plus diesel consumption compression and emergency diesel import for diesel, and either kerosene export reduction alone or upstream measures plus emergency kerosene import for kerosene, with the latter showing better cost-effectiveness. Under the Strait of Malacca blockade scenario, which causes a 73.5% crude oil import shortfall, gasoline and diesel require inventory-release caps of 39% and 27%, respectively, whereas kerosene can be restored through a targeted second-stage combination. These findings suggest that strengthening COSC resilience requires prioritizing upstream supply-support measures, enhancing reserve governance flexibility, adopting differentiated strategies for refined oil products, diversifying import sources and maritime routes, and developing a real-time risk early-warning and emergency decision-support platform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19938,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Science","volume":"23 10","pages":"Pages 6852-6871"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822626005157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurring geopolitical disruptions have intensified uncertainty in international energy supply chains, making supply chain resilience a critical dimension of energy security. Although China is a major crude oil importer, the resilience of its crude oil supply chain (COSC) has received limited attention. This study employs a coupled system dynamics and input-output model to simulate COSC resilience under geopolitical disruptions and identifies priority emergency response strategies for the gasoline, diesel, and kerosene supply chains by evaluating the recovery capacity and cost-effectiveness of alternative emergency measure combinations. Results show that releasing 10% of the strategic petroleum reserve and 10% of refined oil inventories provides a baseline response but cannot fully offset severe import disruptions. Under the Middle East conflict scenario, which causes a 47% crude oil import shortfall lasting 180 days, upstream measures are generally more cost-effective than downstream ones. Full recovery requires upstream measures plus gasoline export reduction and consumption compression for gasoline, upstream measures plus diesel consumption compression and emergency diesel import for diesel, and either kerosene export reduction alone or upstream measures plus emergency kerosene import for kerosene, with the latter showing better cost-effectiveness. Under the Strait of Malacca blockade scenario, which causes a 73.5% crude oil import shortfall, gasoline and diesel require inventory-release caps of 39% and 27%, respectively, whereas kerosene can be restored through a targeted second-stage combination. These findings suggest that strengthening COSC resilience requires prioritizing upstream supply-support measures, enhancing reserve governance flexibility, adopting differentiated strategies for refined oil products, diversifying import sources and maritime routes, and developing a real-time risk early-warning and emergency decision-support platform.
地缘政治干扰下中国原油供应链弹性模拟与优化
反复出现的地缘政治动荡加剧了国际能源供应链的不确定性,使供应链弹性成为能源安全的一个关键方面。虽然中国是一个主要的原油进口国,但其原油供应链(COSC)的弹性受到的关注有限。本研究采用耦合系统动力学和投入产出模型来模拟地缘政治干扰下的COSC弹性,并通过评估替代应急措施组合的恢复能力和成本效益,确定汽油、柴油和煤油供应链的优先应急响应策略。结果表明,释放10%的战略石油储备和10%的成品油库存提供了基线响应,但不能完全抵消严重的进口中断。在中东冲突的情况下,导致47%的原油进口短缺持续180天,上游措施通常比下游措施更具成本效益。全面恢复需要上游措施加汽油出口减少和汽油消费压缩,上游措施加柴油消费压缩和柴油应急进口,或者单独减少煤油出口,或者上游措施加煤油应急进口,后者的成本效益更好。在马六甲海峡封锁的情况下,导致原油进口短缺73.5%,汽油和柴油的库存释放上限分别为39%和27%,而煤油可以通过有针对性的第二阶段组合来恢复。研究结果表明,加强cocs弹性需要优先考虑上游供应支持措施,提高储备治理灵活性,对成品油采取差异化策略,多样化进口来源和海上航线,建立实时风险预警和应急决策支持平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum Science
Petroleum Science 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.10%
发文量
311
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Petroleum Science is the only English journal in China on petroleum science and technology that is intended for professionals engaged in petroleum science research and technical applications all over the world, as well as the managerial personnel of oil companies. It covers petroleum geology, petroleum geophysics, petroleum engineering, petrochemistry & chemical engineering, petroleum mechanics, and economic management. It aims to introduce the latest results in oil industry research in China, promote cooperation in petroleum science research between China and the rest of the world, and build a bridge for scientific communication between China and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书