A fast bidirectional pressure decay method for measuring permeability and porosity in tight rocks

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Petroleum Science Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.petsci.2026.06.047
Xue-Yuan Li, Feng Zhu, Shao-Jie Zhang, Teng-Yu Wang, Shang-Bin Chen, Yang Wang, Chu Zhang, Jin Xu, Peng Liu
{"title":"A fast bidirectional pressure decay method for measuring permeability and porosity in tight rocks","authors":"Xue-Yuan Li,&nbsp;Feng Zhu,&nbsp;Shao-Jie Zhang,&nbsp;Teng-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Shang-Bin Chen,&nbsp;Yang Wang,&nbsp;Chu Zhang,&nbsp;Jin Xu,&nbsp;Peng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.petsci.2026.06.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Permeability and porosity parameters of tight rocks are of crucial importance to the applications ranging from extraction of geothermal and hydrocarbon resources to subsurface storage of carbon, nuclear waste, and hydrogen. Separate measurements of permeability and porosity, however, cost time and can produce erroneous results. We designed a bidirectional pressure decay (BPD) experiment to assess the porosity and permeability at the same time. A pressure differential was applied between a gas chamber and a core sample’s two end surfaces. The pressure in chamber (<em>p</em><sub>c</sub>) was recorded with time until the pressure reached an equilibrium pressure (<em>p</em><sub>e</sub>). The porosity of the core sample was computed based on the gas mass amount in chamber and core sample. The mathematical model was derived for this BPD method. The exact solution of the model was validated with numerical results. The late-time solution shows that the difference between <em>p</em><sub>c</sub> and <em>p</em><sub>e</sub> has a linear correlation with time on a semi-logarithmic plot. The permeability was produced based on the slope of the linear regression. Applying confining pressures ranging from 12 MPa to 22 MPa, the BPD method was implemented for estimating the porosity and permeability of a shale sample. The results suggest that it can efficiently measure the stress-dependent porosity (2.23%–2.61%) and permeability (2.21×10<sup>−5</sup>–3.72×10<sup>−5</sup> mD) of the sample. This technique has two main advantages: On the one hand, it is highly efficient due to the bidirectional flow pattern, allowing gas to enter the core through both end surfaces and drastically reducing experimental duration; On the other hand, measuring porosity and permeability from a single experiment is more straightforward and precise than testing them separately.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19938,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Science","volume":"23 10","pages":"Pages 6042-6052"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822626004218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permeability and porosity parameters of tight rocks are of crucial importance to the applications ranging from extraction of geothermal and hydrocarbon resources to subsurface storage of carbon, nuclear waste, and hydrogen. Separate measurements of permeability and porosity, however, cost time and can produce erroneous results. We designed a bidirectional pressure decay (BPD) experiment to assess the porosity and permeability at the same time. A pressure differential was applied between a gas chamber and a core sample’s two end surfaces. The pressure in chamber (pc) was recorded with time until the pressure reached an equilibrium pressure (pe). The porosity of the core sample was computed based on the gas mass amount in chamber and core sample. The mathematical model was derived for this BPD method. The exact solution of the model was validated with numerical results. The late-time solution shows that the difference between pc and pe has a linear correlation with time on a semi-logarithmic plot. The permeability was produced based on the slope of the linear regression. Applying confining pressures ranging from 12 MPa to 22 MPa, the BPD method was implemented for estimating the porosity and permeability of a shale sample. The results suggest that it can efficiently measure the stress-dependent porosity (2.23%–2.61%) and permeability (2.21×10−5–3.72×10−5 mD) of the sample. This technique has two main advantages: On the one hand, it is highly efficient due to the bidirectional flow pattern, allowing gas to enter the core through both end surfaces and drastically reducing experimental duration; On the other hand, measuring porosity and permeability from a single experiment is more straightforward and precise than testing them separately.
一种测量致密岩石渗透率和孔隙度的快速双向压力衰减方法
致密岩的渗透率和孔隙度参数对于地热资源和油气资源的开采,以及碳、核废料和氢的地下储存等应用至关重要。然而,单独测量渗透率和孔隙度既费时又可能产生错误的结果。我们设计了一个双向压力衰减(BPD)实验来同时评估孔隙度和渗透率。在毒气室和岩心样品的两个端面之间施加压差。记录室内压力(pc)随时间的变化,直到压力达到平衡压力(pe)。根据室内气体的质量和岩心样品的质量计算岩心样品的孔隙度。建立了该方法的数学模型。数值结果验证了模型的精确解。晚时解表明,在半对数图上,pc和pe的差值与时间呈线性相关。渗透率由线性回归斜率计算得到。在12 ~ 22 MPa的围压范围内,采用BPD方法估算了页岩样品的孔隙度和渗透率。结果表明,该方法能有效测量样品的应力相关孔隙度(2.23% ~ 2.61%)和渗透率(2.21×10−5-3.72×10−5 mD)。该技术有两个主要优点:一方面,由于双向流动模式,它是高效率的,允许气体通过两个端面进入岩心,大大缩短了实验时间;另一方面,通过单个实验测量孔隙度和渗透率比分别测试它们更直接和精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum Science
Petroleum Science 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.10%
发文量
311
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Petroleum Science is the only English journal in China on petroleum science and technology that is intended for professionals engaged in petroleum science research and technical applications all over the world, as well as the managerial personnel of oil companies. It covers petroleum geology, petroleum geophysics, petroleum engineering, petrochemistry & chemical engineering, petroleum mechanics, and economic management. It aims to introduce the latest results in oil industry research in China, promote cooperation in petroleum science research between China and the rest of the world, and build a bridge for scientific communication between China and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书