Phenotypic plasticity of tillering modulates winter wheat agronomic optimum plant density: A quantitative framework for interpretation of G × E × M interactions

IF 7.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2027-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110737
Luiz O. Pradella, Nicolas Giordano, Mary J. Guttieri, Rachel L. Veenstra Cott, P.V. Vara Prasad, Romulo P. Lollato
{"title":"Phenotypic plasticity of tillering modulates winter wheat agronomic optimum plant density: A quantitative framework for interpretation of G × E × M interactions","authors":"Luiz O. Pradella,&nbsp;Nicolas Giordano,&nbsp;Mary J. Guttieri,&nbsp;Rachel L. Veenstra Cott,&nbsp;P.V. Vara Prasad,&nbsp;Romulo P. Lollato","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Context</strong></div><div>Agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) is the minimum number of plants per unit area that maximizes grain yield and varies with genotype, environment, and management interactions. Predominantly, studies on cultivar-specific AOPD treat cultivars as fixed effects, limiting the findings to the pool of cultivars studied.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore genotype-specific yield response to plant density from the perspective of phenotypic plasticity of tillering, i.e., the ability of a genotype to produce tillers in response to the environment.</div><div><strong>Method</strong></div><div>A complete factorial experiment evaluated 24 commercial wheat genotypes seeded at two plant densities (100 and 300 seeds m<sup>−2</sup>) in 12 environments across Kansas, the largest winter wheat-producing state in the United States. Percentile-plasticity regressions evaluated whether plasticity was a positive, neutral, or negative trait for grain yield and its components, and a Bayesian hierarchical model estimated grain yield response to density with varying phenotypic plasticity of tillering.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Tillering plasticity at the crop level was associated positively with tiller number, head number, biomass, harvest index, and grain yield in environments where these traits had high expression; but mostly neutral in environments of low trait expression. Higher tillering plasticity genotypes had lower AOPD in 90% of cases, ranging from null to ~17 plants m<sup>−2</sup> unit plasticity<sup>−1</sup>. Larger AOPD reductions were associated with weather conditions favorable for tiller formation and survival (e.g., greater spring precipitation, greater winter temperatures).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Phenotypic plasticity of tillering was an adaptive trait in high tillering environments, with no tradeoff, as more plastic cultivars reduced wheat AOPD in environments conducive to tiller formation and survival compared to more stable cultivars.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>This quantitative framework can be expanded to other crops and regions to explore genotype-specific responses to plant density.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"350 ","pages":"Article 110737"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429026004132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context
Agronomic optimum plant density (AOPD) is the minimum number of plants per unit area that maximizes grain yield and varies with genotype, environment, and management interactions. Predominantly, studies on cultivar-specific AOPD treat cultivars as fixed effects, limiting the findings to the pool of cultivars studied.

Objective

To explore genotype-specific yield response to plant density from the perspective of phenotypic plasticity of tillering, i.e., the ability of a genotype to produce tillers in response to the environment.
Method
A complete factorial experiment evaluated 24 commercial wheat genotypes seeded at two plant densities (100 and 300 seeds m−2) in 12 environments across Kansas, the largest winter wheat-producing state in the United States. Percentile-plasticity regressions evaluated whether plasticity was a positive, neutral, or negative trait for grain yield and its components, and a Bayesian hierarchical model estimated grain yield response to density with varying phenotypic plasticity of tillering.

Results

Tillering plasticity at the crop level was associated positively with tiller number, head number, biomass, harvest index, and grain yield in environments where these traits had high expression; but mostly neutral in environments of low trait expression. Higher tillering plasticity genotypes had lower AOPD in 90% of cases, ranging from null to ~17 plants m−2 unit plasticity−1. Larger AOPD reductions were associated with weather conditions favorable for tiller formation and survival (e.g., greater spring precipitation, greater winter temperatures).

Conclusions

Phenotypic plasticity of tillering was an adaptive trait in high tillering environments, with no tradeoff, as more plastic cultivars reduced wheat AOPD in environments conducive to tiller formation and survival compared to more stable cultivars.

Implications

This quantitative framework can be expanded to other crops and regions to explore genotype-specific responses to plant density.
分蘖的表型可塑性调节冬小麦农艺最佳植株密度:一个解释G × E × M相互作用的定量框架
农艺最佳种植密度(AOPD)是指每单位面积上能使粮食产量最大化的最小种植数量,并随基因型、环境和管理的相互作用而变化。主要是品种特异性AOPD的研究将品种视为固定效应,限制了研究结果的品种池。目的从分蘖的表型可塑性(即基因型对环境的反应产生分蘖的能力)角度探讨基因型对植物密度的产量响应。方法采用全因子试验对美国最大的冬小麦生产州堪萨斯州12种环境下以两种密度(100粒和300粒m−2)播种的24种商品小麦基因型进行评价。百分位-可塑性回归评估了可塑性对籽粒产量及其组成因素是正、中和还是负性状,贝叶斯层次模型估计了籽粒产量对密度的响应与分蘖表型可塑性的变化。结果在分蘖数、抽头数、生物量、收获指数和籽粒产量等性状高表达的环境中,分蘖可塑性在作物水平上与分蘖数、抽头数、生物量、收获指数和籽粒产量呈正相关;但在低性状表达的环境中大多是中性的。分蘖可塑性高的基因型在90%的情况下具有较低的AOPD,范围从0到~17株m - 2单位可塑性−1。较大的AOPD减少与有利于分蘖形成和存活的天气条件有关(例如,春季降水较多,冬季气温较高)。结论分蘖的表型可塑性是高分蘖环境下的一种适应性状,不存在权衡,在有利于分蘖形成和存活的环境中,可塑性强的品种比稳定性强的品种降低了小麦的AOPD。这一定量框架可以扩展到其他作物和地区,以探索基因型对植物密度的特异性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书