{"title":"Urinary Proteomic Panel Distinguishes Acute Myocarditis from Acute Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Yufei Wang, Yuhan Qin, Jing Yang, Qinghai Wang, Aiwei Wang, Jing Zhang, Anhu Wu, Xiaohan Qin, Jiaqi Yu, Zhenyu Liu, Xiaoxiao Guo","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reliable\r\nnoninvasive discrimination of acute myocarditis\r\n(AM) from\r\nacute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients presenting with acute\r\nchest pain remains an unmet clinical need. We aimed to identify urinary\r\nproteomic markers using mass spectrometry and LASSO regression. Patients\r\nwith suspected AM or AMI were prospectively enrolled. Urinary proteomes\r\nwere profiled by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The\r\ndiscovery cohort was stratified by age and sex and randomly divided\r\ninto training and internal validation sets at a 3:1 ratio. Differentially\r\nexpressed proteins were screened, and a diagnostic model was constructed\r\nusing LASSO with 1000 bootstrap resamplings in the training set. The\r\nmodel was validated internally and further verified in an independent\r\ncohort using ELISA. A total of 42 AM and 80 AMI patients were included\r\nin the discovery cohort. Differential expression analysis in the training\r\nset identified 880 and 1099 differentially expressed proteins in AM\r\nand AMI, respectively, compared with controls. A three-protein panel\r\ncomprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3 achieved an AUC of 0.954 in the\r\ntraining set and exceeded the clinical models (all DeLong’s <em>P</em> < 0.05). Addition of the protein panel to either clinical\r\nmodel further improved diagnostic performance (both <em>P</em> < 0.001). Similar performance was confirmed in the validation\r\ncohorts. A urinary proteomic panel comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3\r\nmay provide a noninvasive approach for differentiating AM from AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"25 10","pages":"5189–5199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reliable
noninvasive discrimination of acute myocarditis
(AM) from
acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients presenting with acute
chest pain remains an unmet clinical need. We aimed to identify urinary
proteomic markers using mass spectrometry and LASSO regression. Patients
with suspected AM or AMI were prospectively enrolled. Urinary proteomes
were profiled by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The
discovery cohort was stratified by age and sex and randomly divided
into training and internal validation sets at a 3:1 ratio. Differentially
expressed proteins were screened, and a diagnostic model was constructed
using LASSO with 1000 bootstrap resamplings in the training set. The
model was validated internally and further verified in an independent
cohort using ELISA. A total of 42 AM and 80 AMI patients were included
in the discovery cohort. Differential expression analysis in the training
set identified 880 and 1099 differentially expressed proteins in AM
and AMI, respectively, compared with controls. A three-protein panel
comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3 achieved an AUC of 0.954 in the
training set and exceeded the clinical models (all DeLong’s P < 0.05). Addition of the protein panel to either clinical
model further improved diagnostic performance (both P < 0.001). Similar performance was confirmed in the validation
cohorts. A urinary proteomic panel comprising TNFRSF1A, F9, and PRDX3
may provide a noninvasive approach for differentiating AM from AMI.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".