Circulating Proteomic Signatures for Multicancer Early Detection: Cross-Platform Evidence for a Matrix–Immune–Secretory Biomarker Axis

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2026-10-02 Epub Date: 2026-08-29 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00526
Vivek Singh, Vipin Kumar, Vidushi Singh, Rashmi Kushwaha
{"title":"Circulating Proteomic Signatures for Multicancer Early Detection: Cross-Platform Evidence for a Matrix–Immune–Secretory Biomarker Axis","authors":"Vivek Singh,&nbsp;Vipin Kumar,&nbsp;Vidushi Singh,&nbsp;Rashmi Kushwaha","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Blood-based\r\nproteomics may complement existing MCED approaches\r\nby capturing tumor-secreted proteins and systemic host responses.\r\nWe reviewed prospective and multicancer studies published from 2020\r\nto 2025 that used Olink, SomaScan, or mass spectrometry and compared\r\nevidence from case–control and prospective designs. Candidate\r\nproteins were classified as established or novel and evaluated using\r\npathway and cancer-hallmark enrichment analyses, GEPIA3.0 Cox analyses,\r\nTCGA Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and TPCPA/RPPA protein abundance\r\ndata. Across platforms, established markers, including CEACAM5, WFDC2/HE4,\r\nand GDF15 were complemented by novel candidates converging on a matrix–immune–secretory\r\naxis. This axis included MMP12 and ADAM8, CD74 and CXCL13, TGFB1,\r\nand CDCP1. Secretory and matrix-associated candidates were linked\r\nto poorer survival in several epithelial cancers, whereas immune-associated\r\nproteins showed context-dependent effects. Tumor-type-specific protein\r\nelevation supported their detectability, and interaction analysis\r\norganized the candidates into biologically coherent modules. These\r\nfindings support an MCED framework combining higher-risk secretory\r\nand matrix markers with immune-context indicators to improve sensitivity\r\nand biological interpretation. Prospective validation and down-selection\r\ninto scalable targeted assays are required before population-level\r\napplication.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"25 10","pages":"5025–5038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.6c00526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood-based proteomics may complement existing MCED approaches by capturing tumor-secreted proteins and systemic host responses. We reviewed prospective and multicancer studies published from 2020 to 2025 that used Olink, SomaScan, or mass spectrometry and compared evidence from case–control and prospective designs. Candidate proteins were classified as established or novel and evaluated using pathway and cancer-hallmark enrichment analyses, GEPIA3.0 Cox analyses, TCGA Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and TPCPA/RPPA protein abundance data. Across platforms, established markers, including CEACAM5, WFDC2/HE4, and GDF15 were complemented by novel candidates converging on a matrix–immune–secretory axis. This axis included MMP12 and ADAM8, CD74 and CXCL13, TGFB1, and CDCP1. Secretory and matrix-associated candidates were linked to poorer survival in several epithelial cancers, whereas immune-associated proteins showed context-dependent effects. Tumor-type-specific protein elevation supported their detectability, and interaction analysis organized the candidates into biologically coherent modules. These findings support an MCED framework combining higher-risk secretory and matrix markers with immune-context indicators to improve sensitivity and biological interpretation. Prospective validation and down-selection into scalable targeted assays are required before population-level application.

多种癌症早期检测的循环蛋白质组学特征:基质-免疫分泌生物标志物轴的跨平台证据
基于血液的蛋白质组学可以通过捕获肿瘤分泌蛋白和全身宿主反应来补充现有的MCED方法。我们回顾了从2020年到2025年发表的使用Olink、SomaScan或质谱法的前瞻性和多癌研究,并比较了病例对照和前瞻性设计的证据。候选蛋白被分类为已建立的或新的,并使用途径和癌症标志富集分析、GEPIA3.0 Cox分析、TCGA Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和TPCPA/RPPA蛋白丰度数据进行评估。在各个平台上,已建立的标记物,包括CEACAM5、WFDC2/HE4和GDF15,被聚集在基质-免疫-分泌轴上的新候选物补充。该轴包括MMP12和ADAM8、CD74和CXCL13、TGFB1和CDCP1。分泌和基质相关候选蛋白与几种上皮性癌症的较差生存率有关,而免疫相关蛋白则表现出上下文依赖效应。肿瘤类型特异性蛋白的升高支持了它们的可检测性,相互作用分析将候选物组织成生物学上一致的模块。这些发现支持MCED框架,将高风险的分泌物和基质标记物与免疫环境指标结合起来,以提高敏感性和生物学解释。在人群水平应用之前,需要前瞻性验证和向下选择可扩展的靶向分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书