Association of Teacher Well-Being With Student Motivation and Achievement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 11.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Theresa Dicke, Kelly Ferber, Emma Devine, Rebecca Collie, Helena Granziera, Philip Parker, Jiesi Guo, Herb Marsh, Ziwen Teuber, Emma L. Bradshaw, James H. Conigrave, Chloe Gordon, Taren Sanders, Lara Tribel, Hye-Ryen Jang, Julia Waldeyer, Michael Noetel, Joel Anderson, Doris Holzberger, Janina Täschner, Rebecca Lazarides, Johnmarshall Reeve, Tayla Kapelles, Danling Huang, Emma Stenz, Rebecca Pagano, Kim Rowston, Ferdinand Stebner, Melanie Trypke, HeeRa Ko, Alison Jardine, Fani Lauermann, Chris Lonsdale, Brittany Watson, Geetanjali Basarkod
{"title":"Association of Teacher Well-Being With Student Motivation and Achievement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Theresa Dicke, Kelly Ferber, Emma Devine, Rebecca Collie, Helena Granziera, Philip Parker, Jiesi Guo, Herb Marsh, Ziwen Teuber, Emma L. Bradshaw, James H. Conigrave, Chloe Gordon, Taren Sanders, Lara Tribel, Hye-Ryen Jang, Julia Waldeyer, Michael Noetel, Joel Anderson, Doris Holzberger, Janina Täschner, Rebecca Lazarides, Johnmarshall Reeve, Tayla Kapelles, Danling Huang, Emma Stenz, Rebecca Pagano, Kim Rowston, Ferdinand Stebner, Melanie Trypke, HeeRa Ko, Alison Jardine, Fani Lauermann, Chris Lonsdale, Brittany Watson, Geetanjali Basarkod","doi":"10.1007/s10648-026-10216-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this meta-analysis, we examine the association between teacher well-being and ill-being with student motivation and achievement. Based on 186 articles, 811 effect sizes, and data from 355,637 teachers, we investigate these relationships through the lens of the Job Demands–Resources Model, Transactional Stress Model, Self-Determination Theory, and the PERMA model. Using three-level meta-analytic models, we found small to moderate associations between student outcomes and teacher well-being (<italic>r</italic> = .18) and ill-being (<italic>r</italic> = –.13). These associations were similarly patterned across student motivation and student achievement, with no significant differences by outcome type. Associations were also comparable across domains of teacher functioning with no significant differences by domain. Moderator analyses indicated stronger associations in secondary school settings. Associations were also larger when teacher and student variables were reported by the same informant, although this difference reached conventional significance only for teacher ill-being and approached significance for teacher well-being. These findings suggest that teacher well-being and ill-being show reliable but modest associations with student motivation and achievement across a diverse body of research, though the evidence remains largely correlational. Given this correlational nature and the influence of measurement source, future longitudinal and intervention research is needed to clarify causal mechanisms and the direction of effects.","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"297 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10216-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, we examine the association between teacher well-being and ill-being with student motivation and achievement. Based on 186 articles, 811 effect sizes, and data from 355,637 teachers, we investigate these relationships through the lens of the Job Demands–Resources Model, Transactional Stress Model, Self-Determination Theory, and the PERMA model. Using three-level meta-analytic models, we found small to moderate associations between student outcomes and teacher well-being (r = .18) and ill-being (r = –.13). These associations were similarly patterned across student motivation and student achievement, with no significant differences by outcome type. Associations were also comparable across domains of teacher functioning with no significant differences by domain. Moderator analyses indicated stronger associations in secondary school settings. Associations were also larger when teacher and student variables were reported by the same informant, although this difference reached conventional significance only for teacher ill-being and approached significance for teacher well-being. These findings suggest that teacher well-being and ill-being show reliable but modest associations with student motivation and achievement across a diverse body of research, though the evidence remains largely correlational. Given this correlational nature and the influence of measurement source, future longitudinal and intervention research is needed to clarify causal mechanisms and the direction of effects.
教师幸福感与学生动机和成绩的关系:系统回顾和元分析
在本荟萃分析中,我们考察了教师幸福感和不幸福感与学生动机和成就之间的关系。基于186篇论文、811个效应量和来自355,637名教师的数据,我们通过工作需求-资源模型、交易压力模型、自我决定理论和PERMA模型来研究这些关系。使用三层元分析模型,我们发现学生成绩与教师幸福感(r = 0.18)和幸福感(r = - 0.13)之间存在小到中等程度的关联。这些关联在学生动机和学生成绩上也有相似的模式,在结果类型上没有显著差异。教师功能各领域间的关联也具有可比性,各领域间无显著差异。调节分析表明,在中学环境中存在更强的关联。当教师和学生变量由同一举报人报告时,关联也更大,尽管这种差异仅在教师不健康方面达到传统意义,而在教师幸福方面接近意义。这些发现表明,教师的幸福感和不幸福感与学生的动机和成绩之间存在可靠但适度的联系,尽管证据仍然在很大程度上是相关的。鉴于这种相关性和测量来源的影响,未来需要进行纵向和干预研究,以阐明因果机制和效应方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书