Felix Carl Schultz, Vladislav Valentinov, Andrea Urbinati, Julian Kirchherr
{"title":"Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership: Microfoundations of Ecosystem‐Related Dynamic Capabilities for a Circular Economy Transition","authors":"Felix Carl Schultz, Vladislav Valentinov, Andrea Urbinati, Julian Kirchherr","doi":"10.1002/bse.71613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition to a circular economy (CE) increasingly depends on circular ecosystems: networks of autonomous yet interdependent actors that must coordinate material, information, and value flows to narrow, slow, and close resource loops. This creates a governance problem: Circularity requires orchestration, yet no single actor can impose coordination hierarchically. Combining an integrative review of peer‐reviewed articles at the intersection of CE, dynamic capabilities (DCs), and leadership research with theory synthesis, we introduce Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership (CEOL): an actor‐level, boundary‐spanning leadership capability that helps convert coordination barriers into governance outputs. We theorize three mechanisms: (1) narrative bridging translates divergent circularity meanings into shared interpretive frames; (2) platform convening creates credible multilateral commitments for coordinated investment; and (3) institutional entrepreneurship produces legitimate rule adaptation across public and private arenas. Each mechanism has a primary pathway to collective sensing, seizing, or reconfiguring respectively, but the mechanisms interact laterally and are recursively reshaped by the collective capabilities they support. Through these governance outputs, CEOL microfounds ecosystem‐level DCs. The framework advances CE leadership research beyond firm‐level adoption, extends DC theory by specifying governance‐mediated microfoundations of collective capabilities, and reframes circular ecosystem governance as a contested, territorially conditioned achievement vulnerable to narrative capture, platform capture or exclusion, and regulatory capture.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71613","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition to a circular economy (CE) increasingly depends on circular ecosystems: networks of autonomous yet interdependent actors that must coordinate material, information, and value flows to narrow, slow, and close resource loops. This creates a governance problem: Circularity requires orchestration, yet no single actor can impose coordination hierarchically. Combining an integrative review of peer‐reviewed articles at the intersection of CE, dynamic capabilities (DCs), and leadership research with theory synthesis, we introduce Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership (CEOL): an actor‐level, boundary‐spanning leadership capability that helps convert coordination barriers into governance outputs. We theorize three mechanisms: (1) narrative bridging translates divergent circularity meanings into shared interpretive frames; (2) platform convening creates credible multilateral commitments for coordinated investment; and (3) institutional entrepreneurship produces legitimate rule adaptation across public and private arenas. Each mechanism has a primary pathway to collective sensing, seizing, or reconfiguring respectively, but the mechanisms interact laterally and are recursively reshaped by the collective capabilities they support. Through these governance outputs, CEOL microfounds ecosystem‐level DCs. The framework advances CE leadership research beyond firm‐level adoption, extends DC theory by specifying governance‐mediated microfoundations of collective capabilities, and reframes circular ecosystem governance as a contested, territorially conditioned achievement vulnerable to narrative capture, platform capture or exclusion, and regulatory capture.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.