Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership: Microfoundations of Ecosystem‐Related Dynamic Capabilities for a Circular Economy Transition

IF 13.2 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Felix Carl Schultz, Vladislav Valentinov, Andrea Urbinati, Julian Kirchherr
{"title":"Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership: Microfoundations of Ecosystem‐Related Dynamic Capabilities for a Circular Economy Transition","authors":"Felix Carl Schultz, Vladislav Valentinov, Andrea Urbinati, Julian Kirchherr","doi":"10.1002/bse.71613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition to a circular economy (CE) increasingly depends on circular ecosystems: networks of autonomous yet interdependent actors that must coordinate material, information, and value flows to narrow, slow, and close resource loops. This creates a governance problem: Circularity requires orchestration, yet no single actor can impose coordination hierarchically. Combining an integrative review of peer‐reviewed articles at the intersection of CE, dynamic capabilities (DCs), and leadership research with theory synthesis, we introduce Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership (CEOL): an actor‐level, boundary‐spanning leadership capability that helps convert coordination barriers into governance outputs. We theorize three mechanisms: (1) narrative bridging translates divergent circularity meanings into shared interpretive frames; (2) platform convening creates credible multilateral commitments for coordinated investment; and (3) institutional entrepreneurship produces legitimate rule adaptation across public and private arenas. Each mechanism has a primary pathway to collective sensing, seizing, or reconfiguring respectively, but the mechanisms interact laterally and are recursively reshaped by the collective capabilities they support. Through these governance outputs, CEOL microfounds ecosystem‐level DCs. The framework advances CE leadership research beyond firm‐level adoption, extends DC theory by specifying governance‐mediated microfoundations of collective capabilities, and reframes circular ecosystem governance as a contested, territorially conditioned achievement vulnerable to narrative capture, platform capture or exclusion, and regulatory capture.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71613","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition to a circular economy (CE) increasingly depends on circular ecosystems: networks of autonomous yet interdependent actors that must coordinate material, information, and value flows to narrow, slow, and close resource loops. This creates a governance problem: Circularity requires orchestration, yet no single actor can impose coordination hierarchically. Combining an integrative review of peer‐reviewed articles at the intersection of CE, dynamic capabilities (DCs), and leadership research with theory synthesis, we introduce Circular Ecosystem‐Orchestrating Leadership (CEOL): an actor‐level, boundary‐spanning leadership capability that helps convert coordination barriers into governance outputs. We theorize three mechanisms: (1) narrative bridging translates divergent circularity meanings into shared interpretive frames; (2) platform convening creates credible multilateral commitments for coordinated investment; and (3) institutional entrepreneurship produces legitimate rule adaptation across public and private arenas. Each mechanism has a primary pathway to collective sensing, seizing, or reconfiguring respectively, but the mechanisms interact laterally and are recursively reshaped by the collective capabilities they support. Through these governance outputs, CEOL microfounds ecosystem‐level DCs. The framework advances CE leadership research beyond firm‐level adoption, extends DC theory by specifying governance‐mediated microfoundations of collective capabilities, and reframes circular ecosystem governance as a contested, territorially conditioned achievement vulnerable to narrative capture, platform capture or exclusion, and regulatory capture.
循环生态系统-协调领导力:循环经济转型中生态系统相关动态能力的微观基础
向循环经济(CE)的过渡越来越依赖于循环生态系统:由自主但相互依存的行动者组成的网络,必须协调物质、信息和价值流,以缩小、缓慢和封闭的资源循环。这就产生了一个治理问题:循环需要编排,但是没有一个参与者可以分层地强制协调。结合对同行评审文章的综合评价,结合CE、动态能力(DCs)和领导力研究的理论综合,我们介绍了循环生态系统-协调领导力(CEOL):一种行为者层面的、跨越边界的领导力,有助于将协调障碍转化为治理产出。本文提出了三个机制:(1)叙事衔接将不同的循环意义转化为共享的解释框架;(2)平台召集为协调投资创造可信的多边承诺;(3)机构企业家精神在公共和私人领域产生合法的规则适应。每种机制都有各自的集体感知、捕获或重新配置的主要途径,但这些机制是横向交互的,并由它们所支持的集体能力递归地重塑。通过这些治理输出,CEOL微基金生态系统级dc。该框架将企业领导研究推进到企业层面之外,通过指定治理介导的集体能力的微观基础来扩展DC理论,并将循环生态系统治理重新定义为一种有争议的、受地域限制的成就,容易受到叙事捕获、平台捕获或排斥以及监管捕获的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书