Epistemic resilience in AI-driven innovation

IF 14 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
James C. Ryan, Massimiliano Cappuccio, Effrosyni Georgiadou, Alessandro Lanteri
{"title":"Epistemic resilience in AI-driven innovation","authors":"James C. Ryan, Massimiliano Cappuccio, Effrosyni Georgiadou, Alessandro Lanteri","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2026.101169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of innovation infrastructure, facilitating information retrieval, knowledge recombination, and decision support. While these applications accelerate innovation cycles, they simultaneously obscure evidential provenance, compromise output reliability, and diffuse accountability when algorithmic insights fail. To address these vulnerabilities, this paper introduces the concept of epistemic resilience, defined as an organizational and ecosystem capability to preserve, adapt, and restore trustworthy knowledge processes amid technological disruption, uncertainty, and epistemic risk. Synthesizing literature across innovation management, organizational learning, knowledge management, social epistemology, research integrity, and human–AI collaboration, this study conceptualizes AI-driven innovation as a sociotechnical knowledge process wherein computational acceleration remains contingent upon the integrity of the underlying epistemic environment. We propose a governance framework structured around four interdependent pillars: epistemic culture and virtues; data and model governance; critical AI literacy and human–AI judgment; and aligned incentives and leadership. Operating across individual, team, organizational, and ecosystem levels, these pillars facilitate the prevention, detection, adaptation, and remediation of epistemic breakdowns. By prioritizing adaptive learning, accountability, trust, and systemic recovery over static oversight, this framework delineates epistemic resilience from adjacent domains such as research integrity, data governance, AI ethics, regulatory compliance, and conventional risk management. Ultimately, this paper establishes a conceptual foundation for trustworthy, AI-augmented innovation and outlines an empirical agenda for operationalizing and cultivating epistemic resilience within organizations.","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"8 1","pages":"101169"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.101169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of innovation infrastructure, facilitating information retrieval, knowledge recombination, and decision support. While these applications accelerate innovation cycles, they simultaneously obscure evidential provenance, compromise output reliability, and diffuse accountability when algorithmic insights fail. To address these vulnerabilities, this paper introduces the concept of epistemic resilience, defined as an organizational and ecosystem capability to preserve, adapt, and restore trustworthy knowledge processes amid technological disruption, uncertainty, and epistemic risk. Synthesizing literature across innovation management, organizational learning, knowledge management, social epistemology, research integrity, and human–AI collaboration, this study conceptualizes AI-driven innovation as a sociotechnical knowledge process wherein computational acceleration remains contingent upon the integrity of the underlying epistemic environment. We propose a governance framework structured around four interdependent pillars: epistemic culture and virtues; data and model governance; critical AI literacy and human–AI judgment; and aligned incentives and leadership. Operating across individual, team, organizational, and ecosystem levels, these pillars facilitate the prevention, detection, adaptation, and remediation of epistemic breakdowns. By prioritizing adaptive learning, accountability, trust, and systemic recovery over static oversight, this framework delineates epistemic resilience from adjacent domains such as research integrity, data governance, AI ethics, regulatory compliance, and conventional risk management. Ultimately, this paper establishes a conceptual foundation for trustworthy, AI-augmented innovation and outlines an empirical agenda for operationalizing and cultivating epistemic resilience within organizations.
人工智能驱动创新中的认知弹性
人工智能(AI)已成为创新基础设施不可或缺的组成部分,有助于信息检索、知识重组和决策支持。虽然这些应用程序加速了创新周期,但它们同时模糊了证据的来源,损害了输出的可靠性,并且在算法洞察力失败时分散了责任。为了解决这些漏洞,本文引入了认知弹性的概念,将其定义为组织和生态系统在技术中断、不确定性和认知风险中保存、适应和恢复可信赖知识过程的能力。本研究综合了创新管理、组织学习、知识管理、社会认识论、研究完整性和人类-人工智能协作等方面的文献,将人工智能驱动的创新概念化为一种社会技术知识过程,其中计算加速仍然取决于底层认知环境的完整性。我们提出了一个围绕四个相互依存的支柱构建的治理框架:认知文化和美德;数据和模型治理;批判性的人工智能素养和人类-人工智能判断;以及一致的激励和领导。这些支柱跨越个人、团队、组织和生态系统层面,促进了认知故障的预防、检测、适应和补救。通过优先考虑适应性学习、问责制、信任和系统恢复,而不是静态监督,该框架描绘了研究完整性、数据治理、人工智能伦理、监管合规和传统风险管理等邻近领域的认知弹性。最后,本文为可信赖的人工智能增强创新建立了概念基础,并概述了在组织内实施和培养认知弹性的经验议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书