James C. Ryan, Massimiliano Cappuccio, Effrosyni Georgiadou, Alessandro Lanteri
{"title":"Epistemic resilience in AI-driven innovation","authors":"James C. Ryan, Massimiliano Cappuccio, Effrosyni Georgiadou, Alessandro Lanteri","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2026.101169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of innovation infrastructure, facilitating information retrieval, knowledge recombination, and decision support. While these applications accelerate innovation cycles, they simultaneously obscure evidential provenance, compromise output reliability, and diffuse accountability when algorithmic insights fail. To address these vulnerabilities, this paper introduces the concept of epistemic resilience, defined as an organizational and ecosystem capability to preserve, adapt, and restore trustworthy knowledge processes amid technological disruption, uncertainty, and epistemic risk. Synthesizing literature across innovation management, organizational learning, knowledge management, social epistemology, research integrity, and human–AI collaboration, this study conceptualizes AI-driven innovation as a sociotechnical knowledge process wherein computational acceleration remains contingent upon the integrity of the underlying epistemic environment. We propose a governance framework structured around four interdependent pillars: epistemic culture and virtues; data and model governance; critical AI literacy and human–AI judgment; and aligned incentives and leadership. Operating across individual, team, organizational, and ecosystem levels, these pillars facilitate the prevention, detection, adaptation, and remediation of epistemic breakdowns. By prioritizing adaptive learning, accountability, trust, and systemic recovery over static oversight, this framework delineates epistemic resilience from adjacent domains such as research integrity, data governance, AI ethics, regulatory compliance, and conventional risk management. Ultimately, this paper establishes a conceptual foundation for trustworthy, AI-augmented innovation and outlines an empirical agenda for operationalizing and cultivating epistemic resilience within organizations.","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"8 1","pages":"101169"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.101169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of innovation infrastructure, facilitating information retrieval, knowledge recombination, and decision support. While these applications accelerate innovation cycles, they simultaneously obscure evidential provenance, compromise output reliability, and diffuse accountability when algorithmic insights fail. To address these vulnerabilities, this paper introduces the concept of epistemic resilience, defined as an organizational and ecosystem capability to preserve, adapt, and restore trustworthy knowledge processes amid technological disruption, uncertainty, and epistemic risk. Synthesizing literature across innovation management, organizational learning, knowledge management, social epistemology, research integrity, and human–AI collaboration, this study conceptualizes AI-driven innovation as a sociotechnical knowledge process wherein computational acceleration remains contingent upon the integrity of the underlying epistemic environment. We propose a governance framework structured around four interdependent pillars: epistemic culture and virtues; data and model governance; critical AI literacy and human–AI judgment; and aligned incentives and leadership. Operating across individual, team, organizational, and ecosystem levels, these pillars facilitate the prevention, detection, adaptation, and remediation of epistemic breakdowns. By prioritizing adaptive learning, accountability, trust, and systemic recovery over static oversight, this framework delineates epistemic resilience from adjacent domains such as research integrity, data governance, AI ethics, regulatory compliance, and conventional risk management. Ultimately, this paper establishes a conceptual foundation for trustworthy, AI-augmented innovation and outlines an empirical agenda for operationalizing and cultivating epistemic resilience within organizations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.