{"title":"Digital Literacy in Adult Lifelong Learning: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Pedagogical Effectiveness","authors":"Joshua Ampofo,Jiacheng Li,Wen Zou,Weiwei Zhu","doi":"10.3102/00346543261484193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital literacy is an essential competency for adult participation in contemporary society; however, it is theorized through several distinct traditions, and its pedagogical effectiveness varies across settings. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence from 89 studies (2019–2024) on digital literacy in adult lifelong learning. Our analysis identifies three dominant theoretical paradigms: techno-functionalist, socio-critical, and ecological. Pedagogical approaches such as authentic problem-based learning and culturally responsive methods demonstrate superior outcomes for learner engagement and skill transfer, though persistent equity gaps disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Building on the complementary strengths of these traditions, we propose an integrative digital capabilities framework that brings together functional, critical, adaptive, and transformative dimensions within a single equity-centered model, offering practitioners and researchers a shared vocabulary that the individual paradigms do not provide on their own. We conclude with implications for practice and policy and call for future research that prioritizes longitudinal designs, intersectional analyses, and participatory methodologies to advance equitable digital literacy education for adults.","PeriodicalId":21145,"journal":{"name":"Review of Educational Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543261484193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digital literacy is an essential competency for adult participation in contemporary society; however, it is theorized through several distinct traditions, and its pedagogical effectiveness varies across settings. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence from 89 studies (2019–2024) on digital literacy in adult lifelong learning. Our analysis identifies three dominant theoretical paradigms: techno-functionalist, socio-critical, and ecological. Pedagogical approaches such as authentic problem-based learning and culturally responsive methods demonstrate superior outcomes for learner engagement and skill transfer, though persistent equity gaps disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Building on the complementary strengths of these traditions, we propose an integrative digital capabilities framework that brings together functional, critical, adaptive, and transformative dimensions within a single equity-centered model, offering practitioners and researchers a shared vocabulary that the individual paradigms do not provide on their own. We conclude with implications for practice and policy and call for future research that prioritizes longitudinal designs, intersectional analyses, and participatory methodologies to advance equitable digital literacy education for adults.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Educational Research (RER), a quarterly publication initiated in 1931 with approximately 640 pages per volume year, is dedicated to presenting critical, integrative reviews of research literature relevant to education. These reviews encompass conceptualizations, interpretations, and syntheses of scholarly work across fields broadly pertinent to education and educational research. Welcoming submissions from any discipline, RER encourages research reviews in psychology, sociology, history, philosophy, political science, economics, computer science, statistics, anthropology, and biology, provided the review addresses educational issues. While original empirical research is not published independently, RER incorporates it within broader integrative reviews. The journal may occasionally feature solicited, rigorously refereed analytic reviews of special topics, especially from disciplines underrepresented in educational research.