Digital Literacy in Adult Lifelong Learning: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Pedagogical Effectiveness

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joshua Ampofo,Jiacheng Li,Wen Zou,Weiwei Zhu
{"title":"Digital Literacy in Adult Lifelong Learning: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Pedagogical Effectiveness","authors":"Joshua Ampofo,Jiacheng Li,Wen Zou,Weiwei Zhu","doi":"10.3102/00346543261484193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital literacy is an essential competency for adult participation in contemporary society; however, it is theorized through several distinct traditions, and its pedagogical effectiveness varies across settings. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence from 89 studies (2019–2024) on digital literacy in adult lifelong learning. Our analysis identifies three dominant theoretical paradigms: techno-functionalist, socio-critical, and ecological. Pedagogical approaches such as authentic problem-based learning and culturally responsive methods demonstrate superior outcomes for learner engagement and skill transfer, though persistent equity gaps disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Building on the complementary strengths of these traditions, we propose an integrative digital capabilities framework that brings together functional, critical, adaptive, and transformative dimensions within a single equity-centered model, offering practitioners and researchers a shared vocabulary that the individual paradigms do not provide on their own. We conclude with implications for practice and policy and call for future research that prioritizes longitudinal designs, intersectional analyses, and participatory methodologies to advance equitable digital literacy education for adults.","PeriodicalId":21145,"journal":{"name":"Review of Educational Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543261484193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital literacy is an essential competency for adult participation in contemporary society; however, it is theorized through several distinct traditions, and its pedagogical effectiveness varies across settings. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence from 89 studies (2019–2024) on digital literacy in adult lifelong learning. Our analysis identifies three dominant theoretical paradigms: techno-functionalist, socio-critical, and ecological. Pedagogical approaches such as authentic problem-based learning and culturally responsive methods demonstrate superior outcomes for learner engagement and skill transfer, though persistent equity gaps disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Building on the complementary strengths of these traditions, we propose an integrative digital capabilities framework that brings together functional, critical, adaptive, and transformative dimensions within a single equity-centered model, offering practitioners and researchers a shared vocabulary that the individual paradigms do not provide on their own. We conclude with implications for practice and policy and call for future research that prioritizes longitudinal designs, intersectional analyses, and participatory methodologies to advance equitable digital literacy education for adults.
成人终身学习中的数字素养:理论框架和教学效果的系统回顾
数字素养是成年人参与当代社会的基本能力;然而,它的理论是通过几个不同的传统,其教学效果因环境而异。本系统综述综合了89项关于成人终身学习中数字素养的研究(2019-2024)的经验证据。我们的分析确定了三种主要的理论范式:技术功能主义、社会批判主义和生态学。真正的基于问题的学习和文化响应方法等教学方法在学习者参与和技能转移方面取得了卓越的成果,尽管持续存在的公平差距不成比例地影响着边缘化群体。基于这些传统的互补优势,我们提出了一个整合的数字能力框架,将功能、关键、适应性和变革维度汇集在一个单一的以股权为中心的模型中,为从业者和研究人员提供了单个范式无法提供的共享词汇。我们总结了对实践和政策的启示,并呼吁未来的研究优先考虑纵向设计、交叉分析和参与式方法,以促进公平的成人数字扫盲教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Educational Research
Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Review of Educational Research (RER), a quarterly publication initiated in 1931 with approximately 640 pages per volume year, is dedicated to presenting critical, integrative reviews of research literature relevant to education. These reviews encompass conceptualizations, interpretations, and syntheses of scholarly work across fields broadly pertinent to education and educational research. Welcoming submissions from any discipline, RER encourages research reviews in psychology, sociology, history, philosophy, political science, economics, computer science, statistics, anthropology, and biology, provided the review addresses educational issues. While original empirical research is not published independently, RER incorporates it within broader integrative reviews. The journal may occasionally feature solicited, rigorously refereed analytic reviews of special topics, especially from disciplines underrepresented in educational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书