Mapping Non‐Linear ESG Trajectories in OECD Countries: A Topological Entropy Approach

IF 13.2 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sana Gaied Chortane,Rami Salem,Salah Ben Hamad
{"title":"Mapping Non‐Linear ESG Trajectories in OECD Countries: A Topological Entropy Approach","authors":"Sana Gaied Chortane,Rami Salem,Salah Ben Hamad","doi":"10.1002/bse.71629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines the evolution of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance across 38 OECD countries between 2010 and 2024 using a longitudinal and multi‐dimensional analytical framework. Moving beyond static ESG benchmarking approaches, it investigates how sustainability trajectories evolve under changing institutional, economic and governance conditions. The findings reveal that ESG transitions across advanced economies are neither linear nor uniformly convergent. Instead, countries follow differentiated sustainability pathways characterised by persistent trade‐offs across ESG dimensions. In particular, improvements in governance and social performance do not necessarily coincide with stronger environmental outcomes, highlighting the complexity of balancing competing sustainability priorities under conditions of uncertainty and external shocks. By integrating Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA), Hierarchical Ascending Classification (HAC) and Topological Local Entropy Clustering (TLEC), the analysis provides a dynamic perspective on ESG evolution across OECD countries. The findings contribute to the sustainability strategy literature by emphasising the importance of adaptive and context‐sensitive governance frameworks for managing sustainability transitions. Practical implications are offered for policymakers, firms and investors seeking to strengthen long‐term ESG resilience and sustainability integration strategies.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the evolution of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance across 38 OECD countries between 2010 and 2024 using a longitudinal and multi‐dimensional analytical framework. Moving beyond static ESG benchmarking approaches, it investigates how sustainability trajectories evolve under changing institutional, economic and governance conditions. The findings reveal that ESG transitions across advanced economies are neither linear nor uniformly convergent. Instead, countries follow differentiated sustainability pathways characterised by persistent trade‐offs across ESG dimensions. In particular, improvements in governance and social performance do not necessarily coincide with stronger environmental outcomes, highlighting the complexity of balancing competing sustainability priorities under conditions of uncertainty and external shocks. By integrating Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA), Hierarchical Ascending Classification (HAC) and Topological Local Entropy Clustering (TLEC), the analysis provides a dynamic perspective on ESG evolution across OECD countries. The findings contribute to the sustainability strategy literature by emphasising the importance of adaptive and context‐sensitive governance frameworks for managing sustainability transitions. Practical implications are offered for policymakers, firms and investors seeking to strengthen long‐term ESG resilience and sustainability integration strategies.
映射经合组织国家的非线性ESG轨迹:拓扑熵方法
本研究采用纵向和多维分析框架,考察了2010年至2024年间38个经合组织国家环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效的演变。超越静态ESG基准方法,它研究了可持续发展轨迹如何在不断变化的制度、经济和治理条件下演变。研究结果表明,发达经济体的ESG转型既不是线性的,也不是均匀收敛的。相反,各国遵循差异化的可持续发展路径,其特征是在ESG维度上持续权衡。特别是,治理和社会绩效的改善并不一定伴随着更强的环境结果,这突出了在不确定性和外部冲击条件下平衡相互竞争的可持续性优先事项的复杂性。通过整合多因素分析(MFA)、层次上升分类(HAC)和拓扑局部熵聚类(TLEC),该分析提供了经合组织国家ESG演变的动态视角。研究结果强调了适应性和环境敏感性治理框架对管理可持续发展转型的重要性,从而为可持续发展战略文献做出了贡献。为寻求加强长期ESG弹性和可持续性整合战略的政策制定者、公司和投资者提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书