Ethical generative artificial intelligence and organizational performance: evidence from structural equation modeling and machine learning

IF 9.1 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Weng Marc Lim,Ahmed Yehia Ebeid,Yara Ibrahim
{"title":"Ethical generative artificial intelligence and organizational performance: evidence from structural equation modeling and machine learning","authors":"Weng Marc Lim,Ahmed Yehia Ebeid,Yara Ibrahim","doi":"10.1108/jeim-12-2025-1303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study examines how the FATAA ethical principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy relate to the usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and, through usage, to organizational performance, with ethical leadership as a contextual moderator. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional theory and behavioral reasoning theory, the study tests a model linking FATAA principles to GenAI usage and, in turn, to organizational performance. A hybrid analytical design combines partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with three machine-learning methods and is applied to survey data from 301 AI-literate professionals. Findings Fairness and accuracy are most strongly associated with GenAI usage, whereas accountability, autonomy and transparency show weaker or non-significant effects. GenAI usage, in turn, is strongly associated with organizational performance, with bootstrapped indirect effects confirming that only fairness and accuracy carry through usage to performance. Ethical leadership is tested as a moderator at both the adoption stage and the performance stage and, notably, neither conditioning effect is supported. Originality/value The study advances the literature in three ways. First, it shows that ethical principles are not equally consequential for GenAI adoption, which calls into question the universalist framing of AI ethics. Second, the hybrid PLS-SEM and machine-learning design surfaces both explanatory effects and feature-level importance, an integration that single-method studies cannot deliver. Third, ethical leadership is examined as a moderator at both the adoption and performance stages, with neither conditioning effect supported, which documents a dual-stage boundary condition for leadership in AI-enabled environments and positions governance-by-design as a candidate explanation for future testing.","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-39"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-12-2025-1303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how the FATAA ethical principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy relate to the usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and, through usage, to organizational performance, with ethical leadership as a contextual moderator. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional theory and behavioral reasoning theory, the study tests a model linking FATAA principles to GenAI usage and, in turn, to organizational performance. A hybrid analytical design combines partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with three machine-learning methods and is applied to survey data from 301 AI-literate professionals. Findings Fairness and accuracy are most strongly associated with GenAI usage, whereas accountability, autonomy and transparency show weaker or non-significant effects. GenAI usage, in turn, is strongly associated with organizational performance, with bootstrapped indirect effects confirming that only fairness and accuracy carry through usage to performance. Ethical leadership is tested as a moderator at both the adoption stage and the performance stage and, notably, neither conditioning effect is supported. Originality/value The study advances the literature in three ways. First, it shows that ethical principles are not equally consequential for GenAI adoption, which calls into question the universalist framing of AI ethics. Second, the hybrid PLS-SEM and machine-learning design surfaces both explanatory effects and feature-level importance, an integration that single-method studies cannot deliver. Third, ethical leadership is examined as a moderator at both the adoption and performance stages, with neither conditioning effect supported, which documents a dual-stage boundary condition for leadership in AI-enabled environments and positions governance-by-design as a candidate explanation for future testing.
伦理生成人工智能与组织绩效:来自结构方程建模和机器学习的证据
本研究探讨了FATAA的公平、问责、透明、准确和自主的道德原则如何与生成式人工智能(GenAI)的使用相关,并通过使用与组织绩效相关,道德领导作为语境调节因素。利用制度理论和行为推理理论,该研究测试了一个将FATAA原则与GenAI使用以及组织绩效联系起来的模型。混合分析设计结合了偏最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)和三种机器学习方法,并应用于301名精通人工智能的专业人士的调查数据。公平性和准确性与GenAI的使用密切相关,而问责性、自主性和透明度的影响较弱或不显著。GenAI的使用反过来又与组织绩效密切相关,其引导的间接效应证实,只有公平性和准确性才能通过使用来提高绩效。在采用阶段和绩效阶段,道德领导都被测试为调节因子,值得注意的是,两种调节效应都不被支持。本研究从三个方面推进了文献的发展。首先,它表明伦理原则对人工智能的采用并不同等重要,这就对人工智能伦理的普遍主义框架提出了质疑。其次,混合PLS-SEM和机器学习设计显示了解释效果和特征级重要性,这是单一方法研究无法提供的集成。第三,道德领导在采用和绩效阶段都作为调节因素进行了研究,不支持条件效应,这记录了人工智能支持环境中领导的双阶段边界条件,并将设计治理作为未来测试的候选解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书