Supporting Science Teachers to Embed Writing: Teacher Perspectives and Curriculum Redesign

IF 3.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Helen Georgiou,Annette Turney,Wendy Nielsen,Honglin Chen
{"title":"Supporting Science Teachers to Embed Writing: Teacher Perspectives and Curriculum Redesign","authors":"Helen Georgiou,Annette Turney,Wendy Nielsen,Honglin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11165-026-10384-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Science teachers frequently express concern about their students’ writing skills but often feel ill-equipped to provide adequate support despite acknowledging its importance. This tension points to the distinct challenges of teaching writing in the science classroom, which necessitates the provision of structured scaffolding. To address this issue our study engaged science teachers in a collaborative project to redesign a unit of work on plate tectonics using the Teaching and Learning Cycle (TLC) as a pedagogic framework to enhance students’ writing capabilities. Interviews with participating teachers revealed not only their perspectives on teaching writing, but also valuable insights from the collaborative redevelopment process, reflections on implementing the TLC as a unit planning framework, and details of our resulting intervention. Notably, teachers reported transformed perceptions and increased confidence, which lead them to integrate more writing activities in their classrooms. These results offer insights into challenges, opportunities and structures that support science teachers in effectively embedding authentic writing activities into their science units.","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10384-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Science teachers frequently express concern about their students’ writing skills but often feel ill-equipped to provide adequate support despite acknowledging its importance. This tension points to the distinct challenges of teaching writing in the science classroom, which necessitates the provision of structured scaffolding. To address this issue our study engaged science teachers in a collaborative project to redesign a unit of work on plate tectonics using the Teaching and Learning Cycle (TLC) as a pedagogic framework to enhance students’ writing capabilities. Interviews with participating teachers revealed not only their perspectives on teaching writing, but also valuable insights from the collaborative redevelopment process, reflections on implementing the TLC as a unit planning framework, and details of our resulting intervention. Notably, teachers reported transformed perceptions and increased confidence, which lead them to integrate more writing activities in their classrooms. These results offer insights into challenges, opportunities and structures that support science teachers in effectively embedding authentic writing activities into their science units.
支持科学教师嵌入写作:教师视角与课程重新设计
科学教师经常对学生的写作技能表示担忧,但尽管承认写作技能的重要性,他们往往觉得自己没有能力提供足够的支持。这种紧张关系指出了在科学课堂上教授写作的独特挑战,这需要提供结构化的脚手架。为了解决这个问题,我们的研究让科学教师参与了一个合作项目,使用教学和学习周期(TLC)作为教学框架来重新设计板块构造的工作单元,以提高学生的写作能力。与参与的教师的访谈不仅揭示了他们对写作教学的看法,还揭示了他们从合作重建过程中获得的宝贵见解,对将TLC作为单元规划框架实施的思考,以及我们最终干预的细节。值得注意的是,教师们报告说,他们的观念发生了转变,信心也增强了,这使他们在课堂上融入了更多的写作活动。这些结果提供了对挑战、机遇和结构的见解,支持科学教师有效地将真实的写作活动融入他们的科学单元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书