{"title":"An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary Students","authors":"Jessy Abraham,Katrina Barker","doi":"10.1007/s11165-026-10383-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary StudentsAbstract Declining enrolment and persistent gender imbalance remain two critical challenges in physics education, both in Australia and internationally. Although research on physics enrolment, particularly at the senior secondary level, is expanding, it has predominantly focused on variables that predict students’ initial intentions to enrol in future physics courses. However, relatively few studies have examined the motivational factors that sustain students’ intentions to continue studying physics after engaging with the enacted curriculum over an extended period. Understanding these sustained influences is critical for addressing attrition beyond the point of initial subject selection. Using a validated, gender-invariant survey instrument, data were collected from 247 students to assess their motivation and intention to pursue physics into their final year of secondary education. Structural Equation Modelling was employed to test a theoretically informed framework, revealing that interest value emerged as the strongest predictor of continued enrolment. In contrast to prior topic-specific models, this study highlights the variability of motivational patterns across the broader domain of physics, reflecting the level at which students make decisions about whether or not to enrol in the subject. Notably, no significant gender differences were found across most motivational constructs at the senior secondary level, although a significant gender difference was identified in sex stereotyped attitudes. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how sustained engagement in physics is shaped and offer important implications for educational practice and curriculum design aimed at improving retention in senior secondary physics education. ","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10383-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary StudentsAbstract Declining enrolment and persistent gender imbalance remain two critical challenges in physics education, both in Australia and internationally. Although research on physics enrolment, particularly at the senior secondary level, is expanding, it has predominantly focused on variables that predict students’ initial intentions to enrol in future physics courses. However, relatively few studies have examined the motivational factors that sustain students’ intentions to continue studying physics after engaging with the enacted curriculum over an extended period. Understanding these sustained influences is critical for addressing attrition beyond the point of initial subject selection. Using a validated, gender-invariant survey instrument, data were collected from 247 students to assess their motivation and intention to pursue physics into their final year of secondary education. Structural Equation Modelling was employed to test a theoretically informed framework, revealing that interest value emerged as the strongest predictor of continued enrolment. In contrast to prior topic-specific models, this study highlights the variability of motivational patterns across the broader domain of physics, reflecting the level at which students make decisions about whether or not to enrol in the subject. Notably, no significant gender differences were found across most motivational constructs at the senior secondary level, although a significant gender difference was identified in sex stereotyped attitudes. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how sustained engagement in physics is shaped and offer important implications for educational practice and curriculum design aimed at improving retention in senior secondary physics education.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.