An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary Students

IF 3.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jessy Abraham,Katrina Barker
{"title":"An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary Students","authors":"Jessy Abraham,Katrina Barker","doi":"10.1007/s11165-026-10383-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary StudentsAbstract Declining enrolment and persistent gender imbalance remain two critical challenges in physics education, both in Australia and internationally. Although research on physics enrolment, particularly at the senior secondary level, is expanding, it has predominantly focused on variables that predict students’ initial intentions to enrol in future physics courses. However, relatively few studies have examined the motivational factors that sustain students’ intentions to continue studying physics after engaging with the enacted curriculum over an extended period. Understanding these sustained influences is critical for addressing attrition beyond the point of initial subject selection. Using a validated, gender-invariant survey instrument, data were collected from 247 students to assess their motivation and intention to pursue physics into their final year of secondary education. Structural Equation Modelling was employed to test a theoretically informed framework, revealing that interest value emerged as the strongest predictor of continued enrolment. In contrast to prior topic-specific models, this study highlights the variability of motivational patterns across the broader domain of physics, reflecting the level at which students make decisions about whether or not to enrol in the subject. Notably, no significant gender differences were found across most motivational constructs at the senior secondary level, although a significant gender difference was identified in sex stereotyped attitudes. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how sustained engagement in physics is shaped and offer important implications for educational practice and curriculum design aimed at improving retention in senior secondary physics education. ","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10383-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract An Expectancy-Value Model of Motivation, Engagement, and Physics Continuation Intentions in Senior Secondary StudentsAbstract Declining enrolment and persistent gender imbalance remain two critical challenges in physics education, both in Australia and internationally. Although research on physics enrolment, particularly at the senior secondary level, is expanding, it has predominantly focused on variables that predict students’ initial intentions to enrol in future physics courses. However, relatively few studies have examined the motivational factors that sustain students’ intentions to continue studying physics after engaging with the enacted curriculum over an extended period. Understanding these sustained influences is critical for addressing attrition beyond the point of initial subject selection. Using a validated, gender-invariant survey instrument, data were collected from 247 students to assess their motivation and intention to pursue physics into their final year of secondary education. Structural Equation Modelling was employed to test a theoretically informed framework, revealing that interest value emerged as the strongest predictor of continued enrolment. In contrast to prior topic-specific models, this study highlights the variability of motivational patterns across the broader domain of physics, reflecting the level at which students make decisions about whether or not to enrol in the subject. Notably, no significant gender differences were found across most motivational constructs at the senior secondary level, although a significant gender difference was identified in sex stereotyped attitudes. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how sustained engagement in physics is shaped and offer important implications for educational practice and curriculum design aimed at improving retention in senior secondary physics education. 
高中生物理学习动机、投入与继续学习意向的期望价值模型
摘要:无论是在澳大利亚还是在世界范围内,入学率的下降和持续的性别失衡仍然是物理教育面临的两个关键挑战。虽然关于物理招生的研究,特别是在高中阶段,正在扩大,但它主要集中在预测学生未来参加物理课程的最初意图的变量上。然而,相对较少的研究调查了维持学生在较长时间内参与制定的课程后继续学习物理的动机因素。理解这些持续的影响对于解决初始主题选择之外的人员流失问题至关重要。使用一种有效的、性别不变的调查工具,从247名学生中收集数据,以评估他们在中学教育的最后一年学习物理的动机和意图。结构方程模型被用来测试一个理论上知情的框架,揭示了利息价值成为继续入学的最强预测因子。与之前的特定主题模型相比,这项研究强调了在更广泛的物理领域中动机模式的可变性,反映了学生决定是否参加该学科的水平。值得注意的是,在高中阶段的大多数动机构念中,没有发现显著的性别差异,尽管在性别刻板印象态度中发现了显著的性别差异。这些发现有助于更深入地理解物理的持续参与是如何形成的,并为旨在提高高中物理教育的留存率的教育实践和课程设计提供重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书