How Does Green Human Resource Management Shape Organizational Sustainable Performance? A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

IF 13.2 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Truong Thi Hue,Nguyen Thi Huyen
{"title":"How Does Green Human Resource Management Shape Organizational Sustainable Performance? A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda","authors":"Truong Thi Hue,Nguyen Thi Huyen","doi":"10.1002/bse.71639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Understanding how green human resource management (GHRM) shapes organizational sustainable performance (OSP) is increasingly important for aligning human resource practices with organizations' environmental, social, and economic sustainability goals. This study systematically reviews how GHRM shapes OSP by integrating performance analysis with an in‐depth synthesis based on the theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM) framework. Following the SPAR‐4‐SLR procedure, 391 articles from Web of Science and Scopus published between 2012 and April 2026 were analyzed for research performance, whereas a subset of 104 articles published in A*, A, and B journals according to the ABDC list was selected from this dataset for detailed content analysis. The findings show a sharp increase in publications since 2016 and reveal that the field is dominated by the Ability‐Motivation‐Opportunity framework, resource‐based view, social cognitive theory, and social learning theory. Empirical research remains concentrated in the hospitality, manufacturing, and service sectors and relies heavily on quantitative, cross‐sectional survey designs. The review also identifies several important gaps, including limited multi‐theoretical integration, insufficient attention to high‐emission and underexplored sectors, overreliance on subjective performance measures, limited use of longitudinal and mixed‐method designs, and inadequate examination of the dark side of GHRM. By integrating these insights into a TCCM‐informed multilevel framework, this study clarifies the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which GHRM may shape OSP while offering a focused agenda for future research.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding how green human resource management (GHRM) shapes organizational sustainable performance (OSP) is increasingly important for aligning human resource practices with organizations' environmental, social, and economic sustainability goals. This study systematically reviews how GHRM shapes OSP by integrating performance analysis with an in‐depth synthesis based on the theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM) framework. Following the SPAR‐4‐SLR procedure, 391 articles from Web of Science and Scopus published between 2012 and April 2026 were analyzed for research performance, whereas a subset of 104 articles published in A*, A, and B journals according to the ABDC list was selected from this dataset for detailed content analysis. The findings show a sharp increase in publications since 2016 and reveal that the field is dominated by the Ability‐Motivation‐Opportunity framework, resource‐based view, social cognitive theory, and social learning theory. Empirical research remains concentrated in the hospitality, manufacturing, and service sectors and relies heavily on quantitative, cross‐sectional survey designs. The review also identifies several important gaps, including limited multi‐theoretical integration, insufficient attention to high‐emission and underexplored sectors, overreliance on subjective performance measures, limited use of longitudinal and mixed‐method designs, and inadequate examination of the dark side of GHRM. By integrating these insights into a TCCM‐informed multilevel framework, this study clarifies the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which GHRM may shape OSP while offering a focused agenda for future research.
绿色人力资源管理如何塑造组织的可持续绩效?文献综述及未来研究议程
了解绿色人力资源管理(GHRM)如何塑造组织的可持续绩效(OSP)对于将人力资源实践与组织的环境、社会和经济可持续发展目标相结合变得越来越重要。本研究系统地回顾了GHRM如何通过基于理论、背景、特征和方法(TCCM)框架的深入综合绩效分析来塑造OSP。按照SPAR‐4‐SLR程序,对2012年至2026年4月期间发表在Web of Science和Scopus上的391篇文章进行了研究绩效分析,而根据ABDC列表,从该数据集中选择了发表在a *、a和B期刊上的104篇文章进行了详细的内容分析。研究结果显示,自2016年以来,该领域的出版物急剧增加,并表明该领域由能力-动机-机会框架、资源基础观点、社会认知理论和社会学习理论主导。实证研究仍然集中在酒店,制造业和服务业,并严重依赖于定量,横断面调查设计。该综述还指出了几个重要的差距,包括有限的多理论整合,对高排放和未充分开发的部门的关注不足,过度依赖主观绩效指标,有限使用纵向和混合方法设计,以及对GHRM阴暗面的检查不足。通过将这些见解整合到一个基于TCCM的多层次框架中,本研究阐明了GHRM可能影响OSP的机制和边界条件,同时为未来的研究提供了重点议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书