AI text transformation and linguistic inequality: how computational mechanisms mediate multilingual academic knowledge production

IF 3.9 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Nora Pireci Sejdiu,Sejdi Sejdiu
{"title":"AI text transformation and linguistic inequality: how computational mechanisms mediate multilingual academic knowledge production","authors":"Nora Pireci Sejdiu,Sejdi Sejdiu","doi":"10.1093/applin/amag089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract AI-based text transformation systems have become mediators of multilingual academic knowledge production. This study argues that the computational mechanisms underlying these systems, including training data distribution, curation, tokenization, and optimization, do not extend multilingual capability neutrally: they structurally privilege certain languages, genres, and epistemic conventions, reproducing the linguistic hierarchies that applied linguistics has long documented in institutional practice. Through a conceptual-interpretive synthesis of 24 studies, the study develops a three-layer framework of transformation processes, epistemic transfer, and institutional mediation. The central argument is that inequality in AI-mediated multilingual contexts may operate not only through representational gaps but through transformation itself, and the framework identifies three dynamics through which this is proposed to occur: the selective preservation of high-frequency content, the contextual loss of embedded meaning, and the normative realignment of outputs towards dominant epistemic conventions. AI systems are unlikely to dissolve language hierarchies; the analysis suggests they tend to embed them computationally. The study reconceptualises multilingualism in AI not as a property of model coverage but as an outcome of transformation.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amag089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract AI-based text transformation systems have become mediators of multilingual academic knowledge production. This study argues that the computational mechanisms underlying these systems, including training data distribution, curation, tokenization, and optimization, do not extend multilingual capability neutrally: they structurally privilege certain languages, genres, and epistemic conventions, reproducing the linguistic hierarchies that applied linguistics has long documented in institutional practice. Through a conceptual-interpretive synthesis of 24 studies, the study develops a three-layer framework of transformation processes, epistemic transfer, and institutional mediation. The central argument is that inequality in AI-mediated multilingual contexts may operate not only through representational gaps but through transformation itself, and the framework identifies three dynamics through which this is proposed to occur: the selective preservation of high-frequency content, the contextual loss of embedded meaning, and the normative realignment of outputs towards dominant epistemic conventions. AI systems are unlikely to dissolve language hierarchies; the analysis suggests they tend to embed them computationally. The study reconceptualises multilingualism in AI not as a property of model coverage but as an outcome of transformation.
人工智能文本转换和语言不平等:计算机制如何调解多语言学术知识的生产
摘要基于人工智能的文本转换系统已经成为多语言学术知识生产的中介。本研究认为,这些系统背后的计算机制,包括训练数据分发、管理、标记化和优化,并没有中立地扩展多语言能力:它们在结构上赋予某些语言、体裁和认知惯例特权,再现了应用语言学在制度实践中长期记录的语言层次结构。通过对24项研究的概念-解释综合,该研究开发了一个三层框架,包括转换过程、认知转移和制度调解。核心论点是,人工智能介导的多语言环境中的不平等不仅可以通过表征差距,还可以通过转换本身来运作,该框架确定了三种动态,通过这些动态可以发生这种情况:高频内容的选择性保存,嵌入意义的上下文丢失,以及输出对主导认知惯例的规范性重新调整。人工智能系统不太可能消除语言等级;分析表明,他们倾向于在计算上嵌入它们。该研究将人工智能中的多语言现象重新定义为转换的结果,而不是模型覆盖的属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书