Lindsey M. Kenyon, Ikuko Wada, Junichi Nakajima, Naoki Uchida
{"title":"Model-Predicted Shear-Wave-Splitting Parameters in NE Japan: Comparison With Observations","authors":"Lindsey M. Kenyon, Ikuko Wada, Junichi Nakajima, Naoki Uchida","doi":"10.1029/2025JB032995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We model olivine crystal preferred orientation (CPO) and shear wave splitting (SWS) in the mantle wedge, using the results of a 3-D numerical thermomechanical model for the NE Japan subduction zone. The model predicts a quasi-2-D trench-normal (E-W) mantle wedge flow pattern beneath Tohoku, given the trench-normal subduction, but a more complex flow pattern beneath Hokkaido due to oblique subduction. The calculations of CPO in the mantle wedge indicate a predominantly E-W fast axis beneath Tohoku, aligned with the mantle flow, but beneath Hokkaido the fast axis orientation changes laterally and with depth (ranging from approximately N-S to E-W) and is generally less aligned with the flow, especially near the base of the mantle wedge. The model calculations for vertical wave propagation yield location-averaged fast directions consistent with observationally constrained station-averaged fast directions: E-W in Tohoku and N-S in Hokkaido. However, the model significantly overestimates delay times in both study areas. Furthermore, model-predicted fast directions from individual event-station pairs cannot explain the variability in the observationally constrained fast directions for the same pairs even when the incidence angle and backazimuth are incorporated into the calculation instead of assuming vertical wave propagation. These discrepancies may reflect the impacts of simplifications in the model calculations and other factors, such as the anisotropy outside of the mantle wedge and data uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"131 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JB032995","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JB032995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We model olivine crystal preferred orientation (CPO) and shear wave splitting (SWS) in the mantle wedge, using the results of a 3-D numerical thermomechanical model for the NE Japan subduction zone. The model predicts a quasi-2-D trench-normal (E-W) mantle wedge flow pattern beneath Tohoku, given the trench-normal subduction, but a more complex flow pattern beneath Hokkaido due to oblique subduction. The calculations of CPO in the mantle wedge indicate a predominantly E-W fast axis beneath Tohoku, aligned with the mantle flow, but beneath Hokkaido the fast axis orientation changes laterally and with depth (ranging from approximately N-S to E-W) and is generally less aligned with the flow, especially near the base of the mantle wedge. The model calculations for vertical wave propagation yield location-averaged fast directions consistent with observationally constrained station-averaged fast directions: E-W in Tohoku and N-S in Hokkaido. However, the model significantly overestimates delay times in both study areas. Furthermore, model-predicted fast directions from individual event-station pairs cannot explain the variability in the observationally constrained fast directions for the same pairs even when the incidence angle and backazimuth are incorporated into the calculation instead of assuming vertical wave propagation. These discrepancies may reflect the impacts of simplifications in the model calculations and other factors, such as the anisotropy outside of the mantle wedge and data uncertainties.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.