Model-Predicted Shear-Wave-Splitting Parameters in NE Japan: Comparison With Observations

IF 4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Lindsey M. Kenyon, Ikuko Wada, Junichi Nakajima, Naoki Uchida
{"title":"Model-Predicted Shear-Wave-Splitting Parameters in NE Japan: Comparison With Observations","authors":"Lindsey M. Kenyon,&nbsp;Ikuko Wada,&nbsp;Junichi Nakajima,&nbsp;Naoki Uchida","doi":"10.1029/2025JB032995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We model olivine crystal preferred orientation (CPO) and shear wave splitting (SWS) in the mantle wedge, using the results of a 3-D numerical thermomechanical model for the NE Japan subduction zone. The model predicts a quasi-2-D trench-normal (E-W) mantle wedge flow pattern beneath Tohoku, given the trench-normal subduction, but a more complex flow pattern beneath Hokkaido due to oblique subduction. The calculations of CPO in the mantle wedge indicate a predominantly E-W fast axis beneath Tohoku, aligned with the mantle flow, but beneath Hokkaido the fast axis orientation changes laterally and with depth (ranging from approximately N-S to E-W) and is generally less aligned with the flow, especially near the base of the mantle wedge. The model calculations for vertical wave propagation yield location-averaged fast directions consistent with observationally constrained station-averaged fast directions: E-W in Tohoku and N-S in Hokkaido. However, the model significantly overestimates delay times in both study areas. Furthermore, model-predicted fast directions from individual event-station pairs cannot explain the variability in the observationally constrained fast directions for the same pairs even when the incidence angle and backazimuth are incorporated into the calculation instead of assuming vertical wave propagation. These discrepancies may reflect the impacts of simplifications in the model calculations and other factors, such as the anisotropy outside of the mantle wedge and data uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"131 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JB032995","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JB032995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We model olivine crystal preferred orientation (CPO) and shear wave splitting (SWS) in the mantle wedge, using the results of a 3-D numerical thermomechanical model for the NE Japan subduction zone. The model predicts a quasi-2-D trench-normal (E-W) mantle wedge flow pattern beneath Tohoku, given the trench-normal subduction, but a more complex flow pattern beneath Hokkaido due to oblique subduction. The calculations of CPO in the mantle wedge indicate a predominantly E-W fast axis beneath Tohoku, aligned with the mantle flow, but beneath Hokkaido the fast axis orientation changes laterally and with depth (ranging from approximately N-S to E-W) and is generally less aligned with the flow, especially near the base of the mantle wedge. The model calculations for vertical wave propagation yield location-averaged fast directions consistent with observationally constrained station-averaged fast directions: E-W in Tohoku and N-S in Hokkaido. However, the model significantly overestimates delay times in both study areas. Furthermore, model-predicted fast directions from individual event-station pairs cannot explain the variability in the observationally constrained fast directions for the same pairs even when the incidence angle and backazimuth are incorporated into the calculation instead of assuming vertical wave propagation. These discrepancies may reflect the impacts of simplifications in the model calculations and other factors, such as the anisotropy outside of the mantle wedge and data uncertainties.

模式预测的日本东北部横波分裂参数:与观测的比较
摘要利用日本东北部俯冲带的三维数值热力学模型,模拟了地幔楔中橄榄石晶体优先取向(CPO)和横波分裂(SWS)。该模型预测了在东北地区下一个准2维的海沟-正向(E - W)地幔楔流模式,考虑到海沟-正向俯冲,但在北海道下由于斜向俯冲,流动模式更为复杂。地幔楔的CPO计算表明,东北地区下方的快速轴以东西向为主,与地幔流对齐,但在北海道下方,快速轴的方向在横向和深度上发生变化(从大约南北向到东西向),通常与地幔流不太对齐,特别是在地幔楔底部附近。垂直波传播的模型计算屈服位置-平均快方向与观测约束台站-平均快方向一致:东北E - W和北海道N - S。然而,该模型明显高估了两个研究区域的延迟时间。此外,即使将入射角和反方位角纳入计算,而不是假设垂直波传播,模型预测的单个事件站对的快速方向也不能解释同一对观测约束下的快速方向的变化。这些差异可能反映了模型计算简化和其他因素的影响,如地幔楔外各向异性和数据不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书