Accessing Free-Energy Barriers from Unbiasing Dynamics: Delocalized Transition States in Heterogeneous Catalysis

IF 5.8 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Peipei Zhang,Chenxi Guo,P. Hu
{"title":"Accessing Free-Energy Barriers from Unbiasing Dynamics:\nDelocalized Transition States in Heterogeneous Catalysis","authors":"Peipei Zhang,Chenxi Guo,P. Hu","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate determination of free-energy barriers remains a central challenge in heterogeneous catalysis. Conventional approaches rely on static potential-energy surfaces or biased molecular dynamics, which often underestimate entropic contributions and distort the true transition-state character. Here we introduce Screened Standard Molecular Dynamics (SSMD), an unbiased computational strategy that initiates standard MD trajectories from quasi-transition states to enrich sampling in the delocalized transition region without artificial constraints or biasing potentials. Reaction free-energy barriers are subsequently extracted from these trajectories through confidence-interval force screening followed by mean-force integration. Benchmarking on CO oxidation and ethane dehydrogenation over Pt(111), we find that SSMD yields smooth, converged free-energy profiles at an order of magnitude lower computational cost than constrained methods. SSMD systematically predicts slightly lower barriers than biased approaches, with deviations increasing at elevated temperatures. We show that the transition state is more delocalized than previously thought, a feature SSMD uniquely captures but conventional schemes severely underestimate, accounting for the observed barrier differences. It is worth noting that SSMD requires the projection of forces onto an appropriate reaction coordinate, which necessitates data analysis and processing and may therefore introduce some degree of bias. The convergence and sensitivity tests presented demonstrate the numerical robustness of these choices for the systems studied.","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Accurate determination of free-energy barriers remains a central challenge in heterogeneous catalysis. Conventional approaches rely on static potential-energy surfaces or biased molecular dynamics, which often underestimate entropic contributions and distort the true transition-state character. Here we introduce Screened Standard Molecular Dynamics (SSMD), an unbiased computational strategy that initiates standard MD trajectories from quasi-transition states to enrich sampling in the delocalized transition region without artificial constraints or biasing potentials. Reaction free-energy barriers are subsequently extracted from these trajectories through confidence-interval force screening followed by mean-force integration. Benchmarking on CO oxidation and ethane dehydrogenation over Pt(111), we find that SSMD yields smooth, converged free-energy profiles at an order of magnitude lower computational cost than constrained methods. SSMD systematically predicts slightly lower barriers than biased approaches, with deviations increasing at elevated temperatures. We show that the transition state is more delocalized than previously thought, a feature SSMD uniquely captures but conventional schemes severely underestimate, accounting for the observed barrier differences. It is worth noting that SSMD requires the projection of forces onto an appropriate reaction coordinate, which necessitates data analysis and processing and may therefore introduce some degree of bias. The convergence and sensitivity tests presented demonstrate the numerical robustness of these choices for the systems studied.
从无偏动力学中获得自由能垒:多相催化中的非定域过渡态
自由能垒的准确测定仍然是多相催化研究中的一个核心挑战。传统的方法依赖于静态势能面或偏态分子动力学,这往往低估了熵的贡献,扭曲了真正的过渡态特征。在这里,我们介绍了筛选标准分子动力学(SSMD),这是一种无偏计算策略,它从准过渡状态启动标准分子动力学轨迹,以丰富离域过渡区域的采样,而不受人为约束或偏态电位的影响。反应自由能势垒随后通过置信区间力筛选和平均力积分从这些轨迹中提取出来。对Pt(111)上的CO氧化和乙烷脱氢进行基准测试,我们发现SSMD产生光滑、收敛的自由能曲线,其计算成本比受限方法低一个数量级。SSMD系统地预测了比有偏方法稍低的障碍,在温度升高时偏差增加。我们发现过渡态比以前认为的更离域,这是SSMD唯一捕获的特征,但传统方案严重低估了这一特征,说明了观察到的势垒差异。值得注意的是,SSMD需要将力投射到适当的反应坐标上,这就需要对数据进行分析和处理,因此可能会引入一定程度的偏差。给出的收敛性和灵敏度测试证明了这些选择对于所研究的系统的数值鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书