{"title":"Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Sequential vs Single-Reactor Tandem Catalytic Routes for Furan-Derived Amine Production","authors":"Catherine Yezeguelian, Marc Pera-Titus","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.6c04070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of intensified catalytic processes for biomass valorization is a key strategy to improve the sustainability of chemical manufacturing. In this work, we compare a conventional two-reactor and a single-reactor tandem process for the production of the furfural-derived amine 1-(furan-2-yl)-4-methylpentan-2-amine (F-ALD-1-NH<sub>2</sub>), combining technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Both routes involve aldol condensation of furfural with methyl isobutyl ketone followed by reductive amination but differ in process configuration, yields, and catalyst requirements. Under base-case conditions, the two-reactor process outperforms the single-reactor configuration, exhibiting 16–20% lower full manufacturing cost (€5250/ton vs €6313/ton) and systematically reduced environmental impacts across all midpoint categories (e.g., 21% lower global warming potential). These differences are primarily driven by the higher overall yield (91% vs 74%) and lower catalyst loading of the two-reactor process. However, sensitivity analysis reveals that process intensification becomes advantageous under optimized conditions. By improving yield, reducing catalyst loading, and optimizing solvent ratios, the single-reactor process could achieve up to 10% lower manufacturing cost and 5–20% lower environmental impacts relative to the two-reactor configuration. Across both routes, key drivers of cost and environmental performance include furfural and solvent consumption, catalyst loading and regeneration, and energy demand for separations. Uncertainty analysis confirms the statistical robustness of these trends for selected impact categories. This study demonstrates that while process intensification does not inherently guarantee improved sustainability, it can deliver significant economic and environmental benefits when reaction performance and process parameters are carefully optimized. These findings highlight the importance of integrating early-stage TEA and LCA to guide the design and development of intensified catalytic processes for renewable chemical production.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"14 41","pages":"18481–18502"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6c04070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The development of intensified catalytic processes for biomass valorization is a key strategy to improve the sustainability of chemical manufacturing. In this work, we compare a conventional two-reactor and a single-reactor tandem process for the production of the furfural-derived amine 1-(furan-2-yl)-4-methylpentan-2-amine (F-ALD-1-NH2), combining technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Both routes involve aldol condensation of furfural with methyl isobutyl ketone followed by reductive amination but differ in process configuration, yields, and catalyst requirements. Under base-case conditions, the two-reactor process outperforms the single-reactor configuration, exhibiting 16–20% lower full manufacturing cost (€5250/ton vs €6313/ton) and systematically reduced environmental impacts across all midpoint categories (e.g., 21% lower global warming potential). These differences are primarily driven by the higher overall yield (91% vs 74%) and lower catalyst loading of the two-reactor process. However, sensitivity analysis reveals that process intensification becomes advantageous under optimized conditions. By improving yield, reducing catalyst loading, and optimizing solvent ratios, the single-reactor process could achieve up to 10% lower manufacturing cost and 5–20% lower environmental impacts relative to the two-reactor configuration. Across both routes, key drivers of cost and environmental performance include furfural and solvent consumption, catalyst loading and regeneration, and energy demand for separations. Uncertainty analysis confirms the statistical robustness of these trends for selected impact categories. This study demonstrates that while process intensification does not inherently guarantee improved sustainability, it can deliver significant economic and environmental benefits when reaction performance and process parameters are carefully optimized. These findings highlight the importance of integrating early-stage TEA and LCA to guide the design and development of intensified catalytic processes for renewable chemical production.
发展生物质增值强化催化工艺是提高化工制造可持续性的关键策略。在这项工作中,我们比较了传统的双反应器和单反应器串联工艺生产糠醛衍生胺1-(呋喃-2-基)-4-甲基戊烷-2-胺(F-ALD-1-NH2),结合技术经济分析(TEA)和从摇篮到gate的生命周期评估(LCA)。这两种途径都是将糠醛与甲基异丁基酮进行醛缩反应,然后进行还原胺化反应,但在工艺配置、产率和催化剂要求上有所不同。在基本情况下,双反应器工艺优于单反应器配置,显示出16-20%的全制造成本降低(5250欧元/吨vs 6313欧元/吨),并且系统地减少了所有中点类别的环境影响(例如,降低了21%的全球变暖潜势)。这些差异主要是由更高的总产率(91% vs 74%)和更低的催化剂负载驱动的。然而,灵敏度分析表明,在优化条件下,工艺强化是有利的。通过提高产率、减少催化剂负载和优化溶剂配比,与双反应器相比,单反应器工艺的制造成本可降低10%,对环境的影响可降低5-20%。在这两条路线中,成本和环境绩效的关键驱动因素包括糠醛和溶剂消耗、催化剂负载和再生以及分离的能源需求。不确定性分析证实了这些趋势对选定影响类别的统计稳健性。该研究表明,虽然过程强化并不能保证提高可持续性,但当反应性能和工艺参数得到精心优化时,它可以带来显著的经济和环境效益。这些发现强调了整合早期TEA和LCA的重要性,以指导可再生化学品生产强化催化过程的设计和开发。
期刊介绍:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment.
The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.