Improving ABFE Calculations for GPCRs by Addressing Errors in Apo-State Representation

IF 5.8 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2026-10-13 Epub Date: 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01161
Nithishwer Mouroug Anand, Antonia-Florina Panescu, Ronald M. A. Knegtel, Ewa I. Chudyk, Fabio Zuccotto, Philip C. Biggin
{"title":"Improving ABFE Calculations for GPCRs by Addressing Errors in Apo-State Representation","authors":"Nithishwer Mouroug Anand,&nbsp;Antonia-Florina Panescu,&nbsp;Ronald M. A. Knegtel,&nbsp;Ewa I. Chudyk,&nbsp;Fabio Zuccotto,&nbsp;Philip C. Biggin","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Free energy perturbation (FEP) methods provide a robust\r\ncomputational\r\nframework for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and have\r\nseen increased adoption in drug discovery workflows. Among these,\r\nabsolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations are especially valuable\r\nas they enable affinity prediction for novel compounds without prior\r\nexperimental data. However, their broader adoption is limited by setup\r\ncomplexity, sampling challenges, and variable performance across systems.\r\nThese challenges are particularly pronounced in therapeutically relevant\r\ncomplex membrane protein systems such as G protein-coupled receptors\r\n(GPCRs). This underscores the need to evaluate ABFE performance in\r\nGPCR systems and to develop strategies to mitigate these errors. Here,\r\nwe evaluate ABFE calculations across three GPCR systems: the adenosine\r\nA<sub>2A</sub> receptor (A<sub>2A</sub>R), the dopamine D3 receptor\r\n(D3R), and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5). We focus\r\non three sources of systematic error in these systems: (i) inadequate\r\nresolvation of the binding pocket in apo-like alchemical states, (ii)\r\ninconsistent treatment of metal ions, and (iii) insufficient sampling\r\nof receptor conformational transitions between holo-like and apo-like\r\nensembles. To address these issues, we introduce two methodological\r\nimprovements: a biased grand-canonical-like water transport scheme\r\nto improve binding pocket resolvation, and a replica-exchange umbrella\r\nsampling (REUS)-based framework to quantify and correct the free energy\r\nassociated with receptor relaxation to apo-like conformations. Together,\r\nthese approaches reduce the systematic overestimation of binding affinities,\r\nimproving agreement with experimental data while maintaining ranking\r\nperformance. Overall, our results highlight the importance of accurately\r\nrepresenting the apo state in ABFE calculations and provide a practical\r\nframework for applying high-accuracy free energy methods to membrane\r\nprotein targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"22 19","pages":"10428–10444"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free energy perturbation (FEP) methods provide a robust computational framework for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and have seen increased adoption in drug discovery workflows. Among these, absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations are especially valuable as they enable affinity prediction for novel compounds without prior experimental data. However, their broader adoption is limited by setup complexity, sampling challenges, and variable performance across systems. These challenges are particularly pronounced in therapeutically relevant complex membrane protein systems such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This underscores the need to evaluate ABFE performance in GPCR systems and to develop strategies to mitigate these errors. Here, we evaluate ABFE calculations across three GPCR systems: the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR), the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5). We focus on three sources of systematic error in these systems: (i) inadequate resolvation of the binding pocket in apo-like alchemical states, (ii) inconsistent treatment of metal ions, and (iii) insufficient sampling of receptor conformational transitions between holo-like and apo-like ensembles. To address these issues, we introduce two methodological improvements: a biased grand-canonical-like water transport scheme to improve binding pocket resolvation, and a replica-exchange umbrella sampling (REUS)-based framework to quantify and correct the free energy associated with receptor relaxation to apo-like conformations. Together, these approaches reduce the systematic overestimation of binding affinities, improving agreement with experimental data while maintaining ranking performance. Overall, our results highlight the importance of accurately representing the apo state in ABFE calculations and provide a practical framework for applying high-accuracy free energy methods to membrane protein targets.

通过寻址Apo-State表示中的错误改进gpcr的abfecn计算
摘要:自由能摄动(FEP)方法为预测蛋白质与配体的结合亲和力提供了一个强大的计算框架,并且在药物发现工作流程中得到了越来越多的采用。其中,绝对结合自由能(ABFE)的计算尤其有价值,因为它们可以在没有事先实验数据的情况下预测新化合物的亲和力。然而,它们的广泛采用受到设置复杂性、采样挑战和跨系统可变性能的限制。这些挑战在治疗相关的复杂膜蛋白系统中尤其明显,如G蛋白偶联受体(gpcr)。这强调了评估GPCR系统中ABFE性能和制定策略以减轻这些错误的必要性。在这里,我们评估了三种GPCR系统的ABFE计算:腺苷A2A受体(A2AR),多巴胺D3受体(D3R)和代谢性谷氨酸受体5 (mGlu5)。我们重点研究了这些系统中系统误差的三个来源:(i)对载脂蛋白样炼金术状态下结合口袋的解析不足,(ii)金属离子处理不一致,以及(iii)对全息和载脂蛋白样集合之间受体构象转变的采样不足。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了两种方法上的改进:一种是有偏的大经典样水输运方案,以提高结合袋分辨率;另一种是基于复制交换伞采样(REUS)的框架,用于量化和校正与受体弛豫到载子样构象相关的自由能。总之,这些方法减少了对绑定亲和力的系统高估,在保持排序性能的同时提高了与实验数据的一致性。总之,我们的研究结果强调了在ABFE计算中准确表示载脂蛋白状态的重要性,并为将高精度自由能方法应用于膜蛋白靶标提供了一个实用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书