Nithishwer Mouroug Anand, Antonia-Florina Panescu, Ronald M. A. Knegtel, Ewa I. Chudyk, Fabio Zuccotto, Philip C. Biggin
{"title":"Improving ABFE Calculations for GPCRs by Addressing Errors in Apo-State Representation","authors":"Nithishwer Mouroug Anand, Antonia-Florina Panescu, Ronald M. A. Knegtel, Ewa I. Chudyk, Fabio Zuccotto, Philip C. Biggin","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Free energy perturbation (FEP) methods provide a robust\r\ncomputational\r\nframework for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and have\r\nseen increased adoption in drug discovery workflows. Among these,\r\nabsolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations are especially valuable\r\nas they enable affinity prediction for novel compounds without prior\r\nexperimental data. However, their broader adoption is limited by setup\r\ncomplexity, sampling challenges, and variable performance across systems.\r\nThese challenges are particularly pronounced in therapeutically relevant\r\ncomplex membrane protein systems such as G protein-coupled receptors\r\n(GPCRs). This underscores the need to evaluate ABFE performance in\r\nGPCR systems and to develop strategies to mitigate these errors. Here,\r\nwe evaluate ABFE calculations across three GPCR systems: the adenosine\r\nA<sub>2A</sub> receptor (A<sub>2A</sub>R), the dopamine D3 receptor\r\n(D3R), and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5). We focus\r\non three sources of systematic error in these systems: (i) inadequate\r\nresolvation of the binding pocket in apo-like alchemical states, (ii)\r\ninconsistent treatment of metal ions, and (iii) insufficient sampling\r\nof receptor conformational transitions between holo-like and apo-like\r\nensembles. To address these issues, we introduce two methodological\r\nimprovements: a biased grand-canonical-like water transport scheme\r\nto improve binding pocket resolvation, and a replica-exchange umbrella\r\nsampling (REUS)-based framework to quantify and correct the free energy\r\nassociated with receptor relaxation to apo-like conformations. Together,\r\nthese approaches reduce the systematic overestimation of binding affinities,\r\nimproving agreement with experimental data while maintaining ranking\r\nperformance. Overall, our results highlight the importance of accurately\r\nrepresenting the apo state in ABFE calculations and provide a practical\r\nframework for applying high-accuracy free energy methods to membrane\r\nprotein targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"22 19","pages":"10428–10444"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c01161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Free energy perturbation (FEP) methods provide a robust
computational
framework for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and have
seen increased adoption in drug discovery workflows. Among these,
absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations are especially valuable
as they enable affinity prediction for novel compounds without prior
experimental data. However, their broader adoption is limited by setup
complexity, sampling challenges, and variable performance across systems.
These challenges are particularly pronounced in therapeutically relevant
complex membrane protein systems such as G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs). This underscores the need to evaluate ABFE performance in
GPCR systems and to develop strategies to mitigate these errors. Here,
we evaluate ABFE calculations across three GPCR systems: the adenosine
A2A receptor (A2AR), the dopamine D3 receptor
(D3R), and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5). We focus
on three sources of systematic error in these systems: (i) inadequate
resolvation of the binding pocket in apo-like alchemical states, (ii)
inconsistent treatment of metal ions, and (iii) insufficient sampling
of receptor conformational transitions between holo-like and apo-like
ensembles. To address these issues, we introduce two methodological
improvements: a biased grand-canonical-like water transport scheme
to improve binding pocket resolvation, and a replica-exchange umbrella
sampling (REUS)-based framework to quantify and correct the free energy
associated with receptor relaxation to apo-like conformations. Together,
these approaches reduce the systematic overestimation of binding affinities,
improving agreement with experimental data while maintaining ranking
performance. Overall, our results highlight the importance of accurately
representing the apo state in ABFE calculations and provide a practical
framework for applying high-accuracy free energy methods to membrane
protein targets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.